Policy presence
Charles University has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Prague, Czechia
Charles University
Charles University is listed as QS 2026 rank =265. Charles University has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Charles University is listed as QS 2026 rank =265. Charles University has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Charles University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 15, 2026 and last changed on May 15, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/charles-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: DeepSeek, Microsoft Copilot.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Charles University has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Charles University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Charles University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Charles University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Approved tools
Charles University has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Charles University has 4 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
Charles University has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Charles University advises users not to put sensitive data, personal data, or internal university data into commonly available chatbots; it limits protected/internal-data use to Microsoft Copilot under the university license or specific local-model cases.
Review: Agent reviewed
Original evidence
Evidence 1Do běžně dostupných chatbotů proto nevkládejte citlivá data, osobní údaje nebo interní data univerzity. Tato chráněná a interní data můžete vkládat pouze do nástroje Microsoft Copilot pod univerzitní licencí nebo ve specifických případech do lokálně provozovaných modelů.
Localized display only
Do not enter sensitive, personal, or internal university data into commonly available chatbots; protected/internal data may be entered only into university-licensed Microsoft Copilot or certain local models.
Academic Integrity
For final theses, Charles University says students remain responsible for submitted work and should truthfully describe how, to what extent, and for what purpose they used generative AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Original evidence
Evidence 1Za každou odevzdanou práci vždy plně odpovídá studující... To znamená, že studující by měli na začátek práce připojit stručné prohlášení, ve kterém pravdivě a konkrétně popíšou, jak, v jakém rozsahu a k jakému účelu...
Localized display only
Students remain responsible for submitted work and should attach a statement describing how, how much, and why they used generative AI.
Ai Tool Treatment
Charles University provides advisory guidance for using generative AI in final theses and says individual faculties may set their own permissions, rules, and restrictions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Original evidence
Evidence 1Toto doporučení poskytuje obecný rámec a pravidla práce s generativní umělou inteligencí v závěrečných pracích. Zároveň je však pouze doporučující; jednotlivé fakulty si mohou samy stanovit, do jakého stupně využití budou generativní AI ... povolovat, případně nastavit další vlastní pravidla a omezení.
Localized display only
The recommendation gives a general framework for generative AI in final theses, but says faculties may set their own permissions, rules, and restrictions.
Ai Tool Treatment
Charles University lists Microsoft Copilot for Education as a generally available AI chatbot for all Charles University employees and students via the university Office 365 access path.
Review: Agent reviewed
Original evidence
Evidence 1Microsoft Copilot for Education... Dostupnost Dostupný přes office365.cuni.cz všem zaměstnancům a studentům Univerzity Karlovy.
Localized display only
Microsoft Copilot for Education is listed as available through office365.cuni.cz to all Charles University employees and students.
Security Review
Charles University leadership does not recommend deploying or using DeepSeek for work and academic purposes and recommends Microsoft Copilot for Education for broad university use because its security risks are contractually and technically treated.
Review: Agent reviewed
Original evidence
Evidence 1V této souvislosti nedoporučujeme nasazení a užívání nástroje DeepSeek pro pracovní a akademické účely... Doporučujeme užívání nástrojů, které mají bezpečnostní rizika smluvně i technicky ošetřena, pro nejširší užití na Univerzitě je vhodný nástroj Microsoft Copilot for Education.
Localized display only
Charles University does not recommend DeepSeek for work and academic purposes and recommends Microsoft Copilot for Education for broad university use.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
Bezpečné užívání nástrojů AI
ai.cuni.cz
Doporučení o generativní umělé inteligenci v závěrečných pracích
ai.cuni.cz
Nástroje generativní AI na UK
ai.cuni.cz
Ochrana dat
ai.cuni.cz
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.