University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

Charles University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Claims5Sources4
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Charles University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Charles University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+10-0
11 # Charles University AI policy record
2+privacy: Charles University advises users not to put sensitive data, personal data, or internal university data into commonly available chatbots; it limits protected/internal-data use to Microsoft Copilot under the university license or specific local-model cases.
3+Evidence (cs, 88e91072beb0): Do běžně dostupných chatbotů proto nevkládejte citlivá data, osobní údaje nebo interní data univerzity. Tato chráněná a interní data můžete vkládat pouze do nástroje Microsoft Copilot pod univerzitní licencí nebo ve specifických případech do lokálně provozovaných modelů.
4+academic_integrity: For final theses, Charles University says students remain responsible for submitted work and should truthfully describe how, to what extent, and for what purpose they used generative AI tools.
5+Evidence (cs, ab9c666ada32): Za každou odevzdanou práci vždy plně odpovídá studující... To znamená, že studující by měli na začátek práce připojit stručné prohlášení, ve kterém pravdivě a konkrétně popíšou, jak, v jakém rozsahu a k jakému účelu...
6+ai_tool_treatment: Charles University provides advisory guidance for using generative AI in final theses and says individual faculties may set their own permissions, rules, and restrictions.
7+Evidence (cs, ab9c666ada32): Toto doporučení poskytuje obecný rámec a pravidla práce s generativní umělou inteligencí v závěrečných pracích. Zároveň je však pouze doporučující; jednotlivé fakulty si mohou samy stanovit, do jakého stupně využití budou generativní AI ... povolovat, případně nastavit další vlastní pravidla a omezení.
8+ai_tool_treatment: Charles University lists Microsoft Copilot for Education as a generally available AI chatbot for all Charles University employees and students via the university Office 365 access path.
9+Evidence (cs, 1d46a8dcf4ad): Microsoft Copilot for Education... Dostupnost Dostupný přes office365.cuni.cz všem zaměstnancům a studentům Univerzity Karlovy.
10+security_review: Charles University leadership does not recommend deploying or using DeepSeek for work and academic purposes and recommends Microsoft Copilot for Education for broad university use because its security risks are contractually and technically treated.
11+Evidence (cs, be7bcd95a95a): V této souvislosti nedoporučujeme nasazení a užívání nástroje DeepSeek pro pracovní a akademické účely... Doporučujeme užívání nástrojů, které mají bezpečnostní rizika smluvně i technicky ošetřena, pro nejširší užití na Univerzitě je vhodný nástroj Microsoft Copilot for Education.

Claim changes

5 claim records

privacy

Charles University advises users not to put sensitive data, personal data, or internal university data into commonly available chatbots; it limits protected/internal-data use to Microsoft Copilot under the university license or specific local-model cases.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagescs

academic_integrity

For final theses, Charles University says students remain responsible for submitted work and should truthfully describe how, to what extent, and for what purpose they used generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagescs

ai_tool_treatment

Charles University provides advisory guidance for using generative AI in final theses and says individual faculties may set their own permissions, rules, and restrictions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagescs

ai_tool_treatment

Charles University lists Microsoft Copilot for Education as a generally available AI chatbot for all Charles University employees and students via the university Office 365 access path.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagescs

security_review

Charles University leadership does not recommend deploying or using DeepSeek for work and academic purposes and recommends Microsoft Copilot for Education for broad university use because its security risks are contractually and technically treated.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagescs

Source snapshots

4 source attributions

Bezpečné užívání nástrojů AI

official_guidance checked May 15, 2026

Snapshot hash
be7bcd95a95a243631fa6f48e5e7b3cdbe74deb53725502aba7f47eded492bdb

Doporučení o generativní umělé inteligenci v závěrečných pracích

official_guidance checked May 15, 2026

Snapshot hash
ab9c666ada3287024dd2fd780b779f1e5c00ad9e48093fbe1e75264c49a5059e

Nástroje generativní AI na UK

official_guidance checked May 15, 2026

Snapshot hash
1d46a8dcf4ad1110576a43986da0a982bfebdff30e7962e768539b869609d068

Ochrana dat

official_guidance checked May 15, 2026

Snapshot hash
88e91072beb0afb6f7ab3d7fba257e051938cfd3a52ad02e027b6e75709ea234