London, United Kingdom

The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Tuntutan disemak

8 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

LSE states that making generative AI tools available does not endorse unrestricted use, and users should check their specific course, programme, or department policy.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%

Nilai ternormalisasi: tools_available_not_unrestricted_use

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
By making generative AI tools available, LSE is not endorsing the unrestricted use of generative AI tools by students and staff. You should always check your specific course and/or department policy on the use of generative AI tools.

Privasi

LSE research guidance tells researchers not to share personal, sensitive, or confidential data with third-party AI tools unless the tools meet LSE privacy and security standards, and it strongly encourages Microsoft Copilot for privacy and security.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%

Nilai ternormalisasi: privacy_security_research_ai_tools

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Researchers should not share personal, sensitive, or confidential data with 3rd party tools that do not provide assurances of privacy and security that are satisfactory to LSE standards. Microsoft Copilot is available for staff and student use in the LSE, supported centrally, and is fully secure and private when logged in with an LSE email in the Edge browser.

Ai Tool Treatment

LSE requires departments or course convenors to classify authorised generative AI use in assessment as no authorised use, limited authorised use, or full authorised use, and to communicate the position to students.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: three_position_assessment_framework

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
In advance of the start of the academic year, all academic departments must agree department-wide or course-level positions on the authorised use of generative AI in assessment within one of the following positions: Position 1: No authorised use of generative AI in assessment. Position 2: Limited authorised use of generative AI in assessment. Position 3: Full authorised use of generative AI in assessment.

Penyelidikan

LSE research guidance applies to LSE staff and students undertaking research and frames generative AI as a supportive tool while keeping researchers accountable for outputs.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: research_guidance_applies_staff_students

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
This guidance applies to all LSE staff and students undertaking research. Generative AI refers to AI systems that create new content, predominantly text but also images, audio and video, based on users’ natural language prompts. It should be thought of as a supportive tool or assistant, with researchers always in the driver’s seat and accountable for what they produce.

Privasi

LSE legal and regulatory guidance tells users not to put personal data, confidential or commercially sensitive data, or certain copyrighted content into external AI tools.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: external_ai_restricted_data_warning

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Don’t put personal data in an AI tool that is external to LSE. If it will swallow the personal data for further processing that LSE cannot control, you can’t use the AI tool. Don’t upload in-copyright content where you do not have the copyright holder’s permission and where the AI tool is known to use inputs as training data. Don’t put confidential or commercially sensitive data in an AI tool that is external to LSE.

Academic Integrity

For 2025/26, LSE requested departments to add assessment safeguards, including observed assessment methods, to help assure degree integrity and prevent unfair competitive advantage from generative AI.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%

Nilai ternormalisasi: observed_assessment_safeguards

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
For 2025/26 we request that departments introduce additional safeguards to strengthen the three-position framework agreed at Education Committee in May 2024 (prohibition; limited; and full use of GenAI). This involves combining observed assessment with thoughtful integration of generative AI technologies, tailored appropriately to each discipline at the programme or course level.

Ai Tool Treatment

LSE lists Claude for Education as available to academic staff and students and Copilot with Commercial Data Protection as available to all staff and students.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan92%

Nilai ternormalisasi: claude_and_copilot_available

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Current tools available to LSE staff and students: Claude for Education: available to academic staff and students. Copilot (Copilot with Commercial Data Protection): available to all staff and students.

Ai Tool Treatment

LSE Claude for Education guidance says use is optional, student and staff data will not be used to train Anthropic models, and personal, operational, or confidential data must not be shared through Claude.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan92%

Nilai ternormalisasi: claude_optional_training_and_data_limits

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Anthropic have guaranteed that LSE student and staff data will not be used to train their models. Use of Claude for Education is completely optional – there is no obligation to sign up. Personal, operational, or confidential data must not be shared via Claude, and Claude must not be integrated into operational workflows or processes.

Source record

Sumber rasmi

6 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Semakagent reviewedKeyakinan95%Snapshot statusTidak diterbitkanJSONJSON awam

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 12, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/the-london-school-of-economics-and-political-science

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Buka log perubahan