Gothenburg, Sweden

Chalmers University of Technology

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Tuntutan disemak

6 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

For thesis work, Chalmers says AI tools may be permitted, but students are required to take full responsibility and make AI-tool use clear and transparent, including how and to what extent the tools were used.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%

Nilai ternormalisasi: thesis AI-tool use may be permitted with responsibility and transparent disclosure

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
You are required to assume full responsibility for your work and must be capable of justifying the choices you've made regarding its content. This includes engaging in discussions about and defending the role AI played in shaping your thesis, demonstrating a clear understanding of how it contributed.

Paparan setempat only

Chalmers requires thesis authors to take full responsibility for their work and be able to justify the role AI played.

Privasi

For thesis work, Chalmers tells students to consult a Chalmers supervisor or relevant collaborator before using AI tools when there are uncertainties, particularly around data privacy and ethical issues.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: thesis AI-tool uncertainty around data privacy calls for supervisor or collaborator consultation

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Always consult with your Chalmers’ supervisor or relevant industry/public sector collaborators before using AI tools if you have any uncertainties, particularly concerning data privacy and ethical issues.

Paparan setempat only

Chalmers says thesis students should consult a supervisor or collaborator before AI use when data privacy or ethical issues are uncertain.

Academic Integrity

Chalmers Library's student guidance connects AI use to plagiarism or ghostwriting risk and says students need to be fully transparent, describe what they did, and cite the AI tool used.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%

Nilai ternormalisasi: student AI use requires transparency and citation in academic-integrity context

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Claiming that what someone else has written is your own text without referencing to it correctly is considered as plagiarism. In relation to AI, this can be interpreted as either plagiarism or ghostwriting, so you need to be fully transparent in your use of AI. Describe what you have done and cite correctly, including which AI tool you have used.

Paparan setempat only

Chalmers Library links AI use to plagiarism or ghostwriting risk and tells students to be transparent and cite the AI tool used.

Ai Tool Treatment

Chalmers Library's student guidance says whether and how AI tools may be used in examinations is decided for each course by the coordinator and examiner, so students should ask at the beginning of each course.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan92%

Nilai ternormalisasi: course-level coordinator and examiner decide examination AI-tool use

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
It is up to the coordinator and examiner for each individual course to decide whether and how AI tools are allowed to be used within the framework of the various examinations. Remember to ask at the beginning of each course!

Paparan setempat only

Chalmers Library says course coordinators and examiners decide whether and how AI tools are allowed in each course's examinations.

Ai Tool Treatment

Chalmers Library's teacher guidance says all Chalmers students and employees have access to Microsoft Copilot, while Chalmers does not currently have a license for ChatGPT.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan90%

Nilai ternormalisasi: students and employees have Microsoft Copilot access; no current Chalmers ChatGPT license

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
All students and employees at Chalmers have access to the chatbot Microsoft Copilot. In addition, Chalmers offers Microsoft Copilot Pro licenses to employees who are interested, please contact your immediate manager. Chalmers does not currently have a license for ChatGPT.

Paparan setempat only

Chalmers Library says students and employees have Microsoft Copilot access and that Chalmers does not currently license ChatGPT.

Source record

Sumber rasmi

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Semakagent reviewedKeyakinan95%Snapshot statusTidak diterbitkanJSONJSON awam

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Chalmers University of Technology AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 15, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/chalmers-university-of-technology

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Buka log perubahan