Policy presence
University of Idaho has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Moscow, United States
University of Idaho
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
University of Idaho has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
University of Idaho has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Idaho has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Idaho has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
Approved tools
University of Idaho has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Idaho has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Idaho has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
University of Idaho has 2 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
University of Idaho's OIT and AI Execution Group memo tells university employees not to put identifiable student, employee, or regulated data into public AI models like ChatGPT and to remain vigilant about FERPA, HIPAA, GLBA, and other compliance requirements when using AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: employees_no_identifiable_or_regulated_data_in_public_ai_models
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Do not put identifiable student, employee, or regulated data into public AI models like ChatGPT. Remain vigilant in adherence to FERPA, HIPAA, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and other applicable compliance requirements when utilizing AI.
Security Review
University of Idaho OIT guidance says agentic AI tools should not receive credentials to university systems, should not be installed on systems with moderate- or high-risk data access, and should be tested in a sandboxed workflow.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: agentic_ai_no_university_credentials_no_moderate_high_risk_systems_sandbox_testing
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Agentic AI tools should not be given credentials to University of Idaho systems. Agentic AI tools should not be installed on systems with access to moderate or high risk data. Any workflows using Agentic AI should be tested in a sandbox enviroment.
Privacy
University of Idaho OIT guidance says data uploaded to or downloaded from AI, including prompts, is subject to APM 30.11 data classification, and that listed AI services are approved only for the indicated data classifications.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_prompts_and_outputs_subject_to_apm_30_11_data_classification
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Data uploaded to or downloaded from AI, including prompts, are subject to APM 30.11. The AI platforms or services below have been approved for the data classifications indicated.
Security Review
University of Idaho OIT guidance allows unapproved, non-banned AI providers only when usage does not violate terms, copyright, or license requirements, uses low-risk data not specific to the university, and includes adequate review of terms of service and AI output.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unapproved_non_banned_ai_limited_to_low_risk_non_university_specific_data_with_tos_and_output_review
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Any unapproved, non-banned AI provider may be used if: Our usage of it would not violate any terms of service, copyright, or license requirements; Our usage of it is low risk data that is not specific to the University of Idaho; Terms of Service and AI output is adequately reviewed prior to usage.
Teaching
University of Idaho Center for Teaching and Learning syllabus language presents three course-level AI options: prohibiting AI use, allowing AI only with prior instructor permission, or allowing AI with documentation and citation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: cetl_ai_syllabus_options_prohibit_prior_permission_or_acknowledgement
Bukti asal
Evidence 1The University of Idaho Center for Teaching & Learning provides the following AI Syllabus Language... OPTION 1) AI Use Prohibited... OPTION 2) AI with Prior Permission... OPTION 3) AI with Acknowledgement.
Teaching
University of Idaho's OIT and AI Execution Group memo advises faculty to provide clear guidance on AI use in their syllabi in Canvas.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: faculty_clear_ai_guidance_in_canvas_syllabi
Bukti asal
Evidence 1Specifically for faculty... Provide clear guidance on the use of AI in your syllabi in Canvas; Consider alternative assessment mechanisms that are less susceptible to AI misuse; Understand when and how to cite AI assistance.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
3 source attribution
Artificial Intelligence Memo from OIT and AI Execution Group
support.uidaho.edu
Guidance for Artificial Intelligence
support.uidaho.edu
Syllabus Language for AI
support.uidaho.edu