Policy presence
University of Idaho has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Moscow, United States
University of Idaho
University of Idaho has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 6 reviewed claims. Last checked May 23, 2026.
University of Idaho AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
University of Idaho has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions, including 6 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 23, 2026. Discovery context: University of Idaho is listed as QS 2026 rank 1001-1200.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Idaho as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 23, 2026 and last changed on May 23, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-idaho.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Idaho has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
University of Idaho has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Idaho has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Idaho has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
Approved tools
University of Idaho has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Idaho has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Idaho has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
University of Idaho has 2 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
University of Idaho's OIT and AI Execution Group memo tells university employees not to put identifiable student, employee, or regulated data into public AI models like ChatGPT and to remain vigilant about FERPA, HIPAA, GLBA, and other compliance requirements when using AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: employees_no_identifiable_or_regulated_data_in_public_ai_models
Original evidence
Evidence 1Do not put identifiable student, employee, or regulated data into public AI models like ChatGPT. Remain vigilant in adherence to FERPA, HIPAA, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and other applicable compliance requirements when utilizing AI.
Security Review
University of Idaho OIT guidance says agentic AI tools should not receive credentials to university systems, should not be installed on systems with moderate- or high-risk data access, and should be tested in a sandboxed workflow.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: agentic_ai_no_university_credentials_no_moderate_high_risk_systems_sandbox_testing
Original evidence
Evidence 1Agentic AI tools should not be given credentials to University of Idaho systems. Agentic AI tools should not be installed on systems with access to moderate or high risk data. Any workflows using Agentic AI should be tested in a sandbox enviroment.
Privacy
University of Idaho OIT guidance says data uploaded to or downloaded from AI, including prompts, is subject to APM 30.11 data classification, and that listed AI services are approved only for the indicated data classifications.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_prompts_and_outputs_subject_to_apm_30_11_data_classification
Original evidence
Evidence 1Data uploaded to or downloaded from AI, including prompts, are subject to APM 30.11. The AI platforms or services below have been approved for the data classifications indicated.
Security Review
University of Idaho OIT guidance allows unapproved, non-banned AI providers only when usage does not violate terms, copyright, or license requirements, uses low-risk data not specific to the university, and includes adequate review of terms of service and AI output.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unapproved_non_banned_ai_limited_to_low_risk_non_university_specific_data_with_tos_and_output_review
Original evidence
Evidence 1Any unapproved, non-banned AI provider may be used if: Our usage of it would not violate any terms of service, copyright, or license requirements; Our usage of it is low risk data that is not specific to the University of Idaho; Terms of Service and AI output is adequately reviewed prior to usage.
Teaching
University of Idaho Center for Teaching and Learning syllabus language presents three course-level AI options: prohibiting AI use, allowing AI only with prior instructor permission, or allowing AI with documentation and citation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: cetl_ai_syllabus_options_prohibit_prior_permission_or_acknowledgement
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University of Idaho Center for Teaching & Learning provides the following AI Syllabus Language... OPTION 1) AI Use Prohibited... OPTION 2) AI with Prior Permission... OPTION 3) AI with Acknowledgement.
Teaching
University of Idaho's OIT and AI Execution Group memo advises faculty to provide clear guidance on AI use in their syllabi in Canvas.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: faculty_clear_ai_guidance_in_canvas_syllabi
Original evidence
Evidence 1Specifically for faculty... Provide clear guidance on the use of AI in your syllabi in Canvas; Consider alternative assessment mechanisms that are less susceptible to AI misuse; Understand when and how to cite AI assistance.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Artificial Intelligence Memo from OIT and AI Execution Group
support.uidaho.edu
Guidance for Artificial Intelligence
support.uidaho.edu
Syllabus Language for AI
support.uidaho.edu
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.