University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Bahasa
ENZHFRPLMS

Bangalore, India

Indian Institute of Science

PenarafanQS World University Rankings 2026: =219Updated15 Mei 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Tuntutan disemak

3 reviewed claims

Privasi

IISc faculty-facing AI guidance says entering data into an open AI tool should be treated like posting it publicly unless there are strong reasons to trust the tool, and says not to input sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%

Nilai ternormalisasi: do_not_input_sensitive_confidential_restricted_information

Terakhir diperiksa
15 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
15 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Hence, entering data into an AI tool should be regarded as equivalent to posting it in public (unless there are strong reasons to trust that a specific tool will not use your queries). Do not enter, contribute, or otherwise input sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.

Paparan setempat only

The faculty presentation warns against entering sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
704962d4…
Diperoleh
15 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Private and Confidential information slide

Penyelidikan

The IISc committee report recommends full, precise, and transparent disclosure of generative AI use in research publications, theses, and other Institute documents, with details depending on how the tools were used.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%

Nilai ternormalisasi: research_disclosure_recommended

Terakhir diperiksa
15 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
15 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
Use of generative AI should be fully disclosed, with attribution that is precise, transparent, and with adequate details. In particular, when one is using generative AI in publications, one should follow the guidelines of the Journal, Conference, or Publisher. For thesis and other Institute documents, one should follow the guidelines for publications given below.

Paparan setempat only

The report recommends detailed disclosure and attribution for generative AI use in publications, theses, and other Institute documents.

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
711c2189…
Diperoleh
15 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Section 6, Disclosure and Attribution

Pengajaran

An IISc committee report recommends 'allowed with attribution' as the default institutional policy for AI tool use in courses, while allowing instructors, departments, divisions, or programmes to tailor the baseline policy.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan91%

Nilai ternormalisasi: recommended_default_allowed_with_attribution

Terakhir diperiksa
15 Mei 2026
Terkini diubah
15 Mei 2026

Bukti asal

Bukti 1
We recommend allowed with attribution as the default institutional policy. This default policy should be articulated via an appropriate channel, such as the Student Handbook. Furthermore, this default policy can be tailored at each level in the hierarchy: individual course instructor, department, division, or programme.

Paparan setempat only

The committee recommends an allowed-with-attribution default for coursework AI use, with tailoring by instructors or academic units.

Bahasa sumber
English (en)
Hash petikan
711c2189…
Diperoleh
15 Mei 2026
Penjejak bukti
Section 5.3, Transparent and Simple Course Policies

Source record

Sumber rasmi

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Semakagent reviewedKeyakinan94%Snapshot statusTidak diterbitkanJSONJSON awam

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Indian Institute of Science AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 15, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/indian-institute-of-science

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Buka log perubahan