University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Język
ENZHFRPL

Bangalore, India

Indian Institute of Science

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: =219Updated15 maj 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Zrecenzowane twierdzenia

3 reviewed claims

Prywatność

IISc faculty-facing AI guidance says entering data into an open AI tool should be treated like posting it publicly unless there are strong reasons to trust the tool, and says not to input sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%

Wartość znormalizowana: do_not_input_sensitive_confidential_restricted_information

Ostatnio sprawdzono
15 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
15 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Hence, entering data into an AI tool should be regarded as equivalent to posting it in public (unless there are strong reasons to trust that a specific tool will not use your queries). Do not enter, contribute, or otherwise input sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.

Widok lokalny only

The faculty presentation warns against entering sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
704962d4…
Pobrano
15 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Private and Confidential information slide

Badania

The IISc committee report recommends full, precise, and transparent disclosure of generative AI use in research publications, theses, and other Institute documents, with details depending on how the tools were used.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność93%

Wartość znormalizowana: research_disclosure_recommended

Ostatnio sprawdzono
15 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
15 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Use of generative AI should be fully disclosed, with attribution that is precise, transparent, and with adequate details. In particular, when one is using generative AI in publications, one should follow the guidelines of the Journal, Conference, or Publisher. For thesis and other Institute documents, one should follow the guidelines for publications given below.

Widok lokalny only

The report recommends detailed disclosure and attribution for generative AI use in publications, theses, and other Institute documents.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
711c2189…
Pobrano
15 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Section 6, Disclosure and Attribution

Nauczanie

An IISc committee report recommends 'allowed with attribution' as the default institutional policy for AI tool use in courses, while allowing instructors, departments, divisions, or programmes to tailor the baseline policy.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność91%

Wartość znormalizowana: recommended_default_allowed_with_attribution

Ostatnio sprawdzono
15 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
15 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
We recommend allowed with attribution as the default institutional policy. This default policy should be articulated via an appropriate channel, such as the Student Handbook. Furthermore, this default policy can be tailored at each level in the hierarchy: individual course instructor, department, division, or programme.

Widok lokalny only

The committee recommends an allowed-with-attribution default for coursework AI use, with tailoring by instructors or academic units.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
711c2189…
Pobrano
15 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Section 5.3, Transparent and Simple Course Policies

Source record

Oficjalne źródła

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Recenzjaagent reviewedPewność94%Snapshot statusNieopublikowaneJSONPubliczne JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Indian Institute of Science AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 15, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/indian-institute-of-science

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Otwórz dziennik zmian