University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Langue
ENZHFRPL

Bangalore, India

Indian Institute of Science

ClassementQS World University Rankings 2026: =219Updated15 mai 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

3 reviewed claims

Confidentialité

IISc faculty-facing AI guidance says entering data into an open AI tool should be treated like posting it publicly unless there are strong reasons to trust the tool, and says not to input sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%

Valeur normalisée: do_not_input_sensitive_confidential_restricted_information

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
15 mai 2026
Dernière modification
15 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Hence, entering data into an AI tool should be regarded as equivalent to posting it in public (unless there are strong reasons to trust that a specific tool will not use your queries). Do not enter, contribute, or otherwise input sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.

Affichage localisé only

The faculty presentation warns against entering sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.

Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
704962d4…
Récupéré
15 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Private and Confidential information slide

Recherche

The IISc committee report recommends full, precise, and transparent disclosure of generative AI use in research publications, theses, and other Institute documents, with details depending on how the tools were used.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%

Valeur normalisée: research_disclosure_recommended

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
15 mai 2026
Dernière modification
15 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Use of generative AI should be fully disclosed, with attribution that is precise, transparent, and with adequate details. In particular, when one is using generative AI in publications, one should follow the guidelines of the Journal, Conference, or Publisher. For thesis and other Institute documents, one should follow the guidelines for publications given below.

Affichage localisé only

The report recommends detailed disclosure and attribution for generative AI use in publications, theses, and other Institute documents.

Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
711c2189…
Récupéré
15 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Section 6, Disclosure and Attribution

Enseignement

An IISc committee report recommends 'allowed with attribution' as the default institutional policy for AI tool use in courses, while allowing instructors, departments, divisions, or programmes to tailor the baseline policy.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance91%

Valeur normalisée: recommended_default_allowed_with_attribution

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
15 mai 2026
Dernière modification
15 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
We recommend allowed with attribution as the default institutional policy. This default policy should be articulated via an appropriate channel, such as the Student Handbook. Furthermore, this default policy can be tailored at each level in the hierarchy: individual course instructor, department, division, or programme.

Affichage localisé only

The committee recommends an allowed-with-attribution default for coursework AI use, with tailoring by instructors or academic units.

Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
711c2189…
Récupéré
15 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Section 5.3, Transparent and Simple Course Policies

Source record

Sources officielles

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Révisionagent reviewedConfiance94%Snapshot statusNon publiéJSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Indian Institute of Science AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 15, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/indian-institute-of-science

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert