Perkara yang perlu dilakukan
- Read the course catalogue before assessed use.
- Document tool, scope and purpose in scientific writing.
- Use the service only within its staff audience.
Innsbruck, Austria
Universität Innsbruck
Student guide · Task scope and procedure
Check course permissions and staff tool scope.
The course director/faculty controls assessed use; scientific writing requires transparent tool documentation. Staff AcademicAI credit and the institution-specific staff Copilot restriction do not establish student access.
Panduan dasar di bawah adalah dalam bahasa Inggeris; bukti rasmi dikekalkan dalam bahasa asal.
Ringkasan lengkap peraturan pelajar belum tersedia; rujuk pernyataan dan sumber yang dikumpulkan.
Skop dan peralihan
The course director/faculty controls assessed use; scientific writing requires transparent tool documentation. Staff AcademicAI credit and the institution-specific staff Copilot restriction do not establish student access.
Perkara yang perlu dielakkan
- Do not transfer staff token credit to a student entitlement.
- Do not use staff Copilot contrary to this institution’s FAQ.
- Do not enter protected data in freely accessible AI.
Apakah yang berlaku jika penggunaan AI menimbulkan kebimbangan?
Tambahan dikumpulkan: 2026-10-08 · Pemakaian semasa belum disahkan secara bebas
Ringkasan kini tersedia dalam bahasa Inggeris
Apabila kebimbangan timbul
Tafsiran laman
Unless the faculty regulates it, the course director decides which AI tools/uses and times are permitted. The course catalogue should state the choice before class starts; students remain responsible for errors/missing citations. A required teaching tool should be accessible free of charge; this is not a free campus account promise for every product.
Skop: Students/course directors within faculty and catalogue requirements · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Lihat teks asal dan syarat
Skop: Students/course directors within faculty and catalogue requirements · university
Syarat dan pengecualian
Faculty rules or course-director decision, stated in course catalogue.
As a teacher, to what extent can I decide for myself which AI tools are permitted in my teaching and examinations and which are prohibited?
Unless specifically regulated by the faculty, responsibility lies with the course director. They can decide what is and what is not permitted in their course and at what time. In the case of courses with examinations, the use of AI could be permitted for certain work assignments, for example. In any case, students are responsible for any errors generated by AI (including missing citations).
In any case, clear and transparent communication with students is important. Students should also be able to talk about their previous experiences of using AI tools in their studies in courses and thus contribute to the discourse and an informed approach.
If students are asked to use AI in courses, care should be taken to ensure that the recommended tools are accessible and usable for everyone (free of charge).
I’m a student. How do I know whether the use of AI tools is permitted in a course?
Whether students are permitted to use generative AI tools in a course, and if so which ones, should be specified in the course description in the course catalogue before the course begins.
I’m a student. How do I know if I’m allowed to use KI-tools in an exam?
Permitted aids (including AI tools) in examinations must be explicitly stated by the course coordinator at the start of the course – ideally in the course catalogue before the course begins; any aids not mentioned are prohibited. Should unauthorised aids nevertheless be used, this shall be regarded as an attempt at cheating.
AI and research
Is it allowed to use AI tools?
Yes, of course, the general principles and standards of good scientific practice must be observed.
How should I label the use of AI tools?
When using AI tools, the guidelines for good scientific practice apply at the University of Innsbruck. The basic principles of transparency and traceability of the generated knowledge must also be ensured when using generative AI models. Therefore, any use of AI tools (name of the tool, scope of use, purpose of use) in the writing of scientific papers must be cited in the appropriate place. Texts, tables, images, videos, software codes, data sets, etc. generated by generative AI must be transparently identified. However, the AI source should not be cited as the author, as AI cannot be considered a scientific source and copyright issues arise.Lihat sumber rasmi ↗Dikumpulkan: 2026-10-08 · 177–189
SHA-256: 07f55ddcb7d3f9dd14c8263782d2155752b923688dc0a2fd93b0cca4d08fb71d
Tafsiran laman
The FAQ forbids personal or copyright-protected data in freely accessible AI and recommends University-licensed privacy-compliant tools. That recommendation does not itself approve every dataset or show that a student can access the staff service.
Skop: University members choosing publicly accessible versus licensed AI tools · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Lihat teks asal dan syarat
Skop: University members choosing publicly accessible versus licensed AI tools · university
Who owns the output of AI generators?
Firstly, the output of a system does not give rise to a copyright for the system itself, as European copyright laws are based on a human act of creation, the realisation of which results in the creation of a work worthy of protection. An AI system is not human and therefore not a sufficient creator. In principle, the system manufacturer also does not establish any copyright in the system output, as it is not sufficiently creative in its creation process. Finally, the user may be entitled to a copyright in the output if they have merely used the AI system as a tool in their creative process. It is disputed whether this is already the case if the user selects a particularly creative prompt, or whether the user must also use the output, such as creating a collage from various AI-generated outputs.
What legal considerations do I need to bear in mind when using AI tools?
Personal data or copyright-protected data must not be entered into freely accessible AI tools; it is recommended that you use tools licensed by the University of Innsbruck that comply with data protection regulations, currently Academic AI.Lihat sumber rasmi ↗Dikumpulkan: 2026-10-08 · 224–227
SHA-256: 07f55ddcb7d3f9dd14c8263782d2155752b923688dc0a2fd93b0cca4d08fb71d
Cara memberikan respons
Tafsiran laman
The FAQ describes staff AcademicAI with a secure no-training environment and €20 monthly token credit, with other licences possibly charged to department/project budgets. It separately expressly prohibits staff Copilot because it says the institutional privacy agreement is absent. These are institution-specific source assertions, not a verified Microsoft-wide behavior claim or student access.
Skop: University staff under the FAQ’s institutional AI services · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Lihat teks asal dan syarat
Skop: University staff under the FAQ’s institutional AI services · university
Does the University of Innsbruck offer AI tools?
The University of Innsbruck offers its current staff a chatbot based on OpenAI technology, as well as a document analysis tool. The model runs in a secure environment and the data entered is not used for training purposes. The service is available at https://uibk.academic-ai.at/. Full details on how to use the service can be found on the website of the Department of Digital Media and Learning Technologies.
At the University of Innsbruck, the Microsoft 365 package includes the AI tool CoPilot, which cannot be technically disabled. As CoPilot is not part of the university’s overall package, there are no agreements with Microsoft regarding the protection of personal data. Among other things, data processing may take place outside Europe, and all input into CoPilot is used by Microsoft to train the model. For data protection reasons, all staff members are therefore expressly prohibited from using CoPilot.
Does the University of Innsbruck recommend the use of certain AI tools?
The University of Innsbruck recommends the use of the in-house AI model Academic AI. The model runs in a secure environment and the data entered is not used for training purposes. All information about the service can be found on the homepage of the eCampus of the e-learning department at the ZID.
You can find futher information on AI tools for teaching and research on this blogpost at the Crashkurs E-Didaktik in OLAT run by the e-learning department at the ZID (only available in German).
Who pays the licence fees for the use of fee-based AI products?
The University of Innsbruck makes the in-house modell Academic AI available to its employees free of charge with a credit of tokens worth €20 per month. Beyond this, there is no central assumption of costs for the use of other AI tools by the university. However, any license fees can be paid from institute, project or department budgets.Lihat sumber rasmi ↗Dikumpulkan: 2026-10-08 · 130–137
SHA-256: 07f55ddcb7d3f9dd14c8263782d2155752b923688dc0a2fd93b0cca4d08fb71d
Tafsiran laman
Use in scientific theses/research follows scientific-practice transparency: name, scope and purpose of AI are documented/disclosed, with field-specific handling. This is separate from course permission and cannot convert a department’s examples into a University-wide allowlist.
Skop: Authors of scientific theses/research under discipline-specific practice · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.
Lihat teks asal dan syarat
Skop: Authors of scientific theses/research under discipline-specific practice · university
Yes, of course, the general principles and standards of good scientific practice must be observed.
How should I label the use of AI tools?
When using AI tools, the guidelines for good scientific practice apply at the University of Innsbruck. The basic principles of transparency and traceability of the generated knowledge must also be ensured when using generative AI models. Therefore, any use of AI tools (name of the tool, scope of use, purpose of use) in the writing of scientific papers must be cited in the appropriate place. Texts, tables, images, videos, software codes, data sets, etc. generated by generative AI must be transparently identified. However, the AI source should not be cited as the author, as AI cannot be considered a scientific source and copyright issues arise.
Are there any general guidelines on how to use AI?
The following guidelines apply when using AI tools in research:
AI tools cannot assume authorship.
The use of AI tools must be disclosed transparently.
Authors are responsible for the work they submit.
What must be considered when using AI tools?
When using AI tools, care must be taken to ensure that all legal and internal obligations are complied with and that no third-party rights are infringed. See also the section on “AI and copyright.”
The basic principles of transparency and traceability of the generated texts, images, tables, videos, software codes, data sets, etc. must also be ensured when using generative AI models. Therefore, any use of AI tools (name of the tool, scope of use, purpose of use) in the writing of scientific papers must be indicated in the appropriate place, e.g., in a footnote. Texts, tables, images, videos, software codes, data sets, etc. generated by generative AI must be identified as such.
Is it allowed to use AI tools for text editing?Lihat sumber rasmi ↗Dikumpulkan: 2026-10-08 · 187–198
SHA-256: 07f55ddcb7d3f9dd14c8263782d2155752b923688dc0a2fd93b0cca4d08fb71d
Pengumpulan dan versi
Tambahan berasaskan sumber yang diterbitkan. Ringkasan Inggeris dan petikan asal dipisahkan daripada rekod yang disemak. Proses dan hasil bukan hukuman automatik bagi penggunaan AI. Pemakaian semasa belum disahkan secara bebas; semak skop dan versi sumber.
Disemak dengan teks tersimpan; bukan terjemahan rasmi
Hash membolehkan perbandingan teks tersimpan; ia tidak mengesahkan kesahan semasa atau ketidakbolehubahan. Tema ini bukan urutan wajib.
Alat AI dan akses
Akses alat bukan kebenaran menggunakannya dalam penilaian. Semak peraturan tugasan, pengguna yang layak dan sekatan data.
Rekod arkib; semak sumber rasmi untuk akses semasa. Butiran akses dan petikan dikekalkan dalam bahasa asal.
- CopilotAlat disebut; akses institusi belum dipastikanKetersediaan belum dipastikan
Akses, syarat dan bukti rasmi
Sumber rasmi 1 ↗Petikan asal
Aus Datenschutzgründen ist daher allen Mitarbeiter:innen die Nutzung von CoPilot ausdrücklich untersagt.
Sumber rasmi 2 ↗Petikan asal
The FAQ says Universität Innsbruck offers Academic AI to employees in a protected environment and expressly prohibits staff use of Copilot for data-protection reasons.
- Microsoft CopilotAlat disebut; akses institusi belum dipastikanTerhad dalam skop sumber
Akses, syarat dan bukti rasmi
Sumber rasmi 1 ↗Petikan asal
Universität Innsbruck offers employees with an active employment relationship access to Academic AI in a protected environment, recommends the in-house Academic AI model, and says staff use of Microsoft Copilot is expressly prohibited for data-protection reasons.
- AcademicAI (Innsbruck current staff)Perkhidmatan dihoskan universitiTertakluk pada syarat
Akses, syarat dan bukti rasmi
FAQ describes the in-house service for current staff, with secure/no-training source claims. Not a verified privacy audit, general student account or assessment permission.
Current staff follow the AcademicAI/eCampus service link; no account tested.
FAQ: free to employees with €20 monthly token credit; other licences may use institute/project/department budgets. Credit is not a student bill or entitlement.
Tarikh semakan tambahan:
Sumber rasmi 1 ↗Petikan asal
Does the University of Innsbruck offer AI tools? The University of Innsbruck offers its current staff a chatbot based on OpenAI technology, as well as a document analysis tool. The model runs in a secure environment and the data entered is not used for training purposes. The service is available at https://uibk.academic-ai.at/. Full details on how to use the service can be found on the website of the Department of Digital Media and Learning Technologies. At the University of Innsbruck, the Microsoft 365 package includes the AI tool CoPilot, which cannot be technically disabled. As CoPilot is not part of the university’s overall package, there are no agreements with Microsoft regarding the
Sumber rasmi 2 ↗Petikan asal
protection of personal data. Among other things, data processing may take place outside Europe, and all input into CoPilot is used by Microsoft to train the model. For data protection reasons, all staff members are therefore expressly prohibited from using CoPilot. Does the University of Innsbruck recommend the use of certain AI tools? The University of Innsbruck recommends the use of the in-house AI model Academic AI. The model runs in a secure environment and the data entered is not used for training purposes. All information about the service can be found on the homepage of the eCampus of the e-learning department at the ZID. You can find futher information on AI tools for teaching and
Sumber rasmi 3 ↗Petikan asal
research on this blogpost at the Crashkurs E-Didaktik in OLAT run by the e-learning department at the ZID (only available in German). Who pays the licence fees for the use of fee-based AI products? The University of Innsbruck makes the in-house modell Academic AI available to its employees free of charge with a credit of tokens worth €20 per month. Beyond this, there is no central assumption of costs for the use of other AI tools by the university. However, any license fees can be paid from institute, project or department budgets.
- University of Innsbruck OpenAI ChatbotCadangan rasmiDibenarkan dalam skop sumber
Akses, syarat dan bukti rasmi
University of Innsbruck provides current staff a secure chatbot based on OpenAI technology.
Use the university-provided chatbot service.
Not specified.
Sumber rasmi 1 ↗Petikan asal
The University of Innsbruck offers its current staff a chatbot based on OpenAI technology. The model runs in a secure environment and entered data is not used for training purposes.
- Copilot (Innsbruck staff restriction)Tidak disokong universitiTerhad dalam skop sumber
Akses, syarat dan bukti rasmi
FAQ expressly prohibits staff use, citing absent institutional privacy agreements. This is a school-source restriction, not independent confirmation of Microsoft-wide data behavior.
Do not use under this staff restriction. Course permissions and approved staff AcademicAI are distinct.
No permissible staff licence or student entitlement inferred.
Tarikh semakan tambahan:
Sumber rasmi 1 ↗Petikan asal
Does the University of Innsbruck offer AI tools? The University of Innsbruck offers its current staff a chatbot based on OpenAI technology, as well as a document analysis tool. The model runs in a secure environment and the data entered is not used for training purposes. The service is available at https://uibk.academic-ai.at/. Full details on how to use the service can be found on the website of the Department of Digital Media and Learning Technologies. At the University of Innsbruck, the Microsoft 365 package includes the AI tool CoPilot, which cannot be technically disabled. As CoPilot is not part of the university’s overall package, there are no agreements with Microsoft regarding the
Sumber rasmi 2 ↗Petikan asal
protection of personal data. Among other things, data processing may take place outside Europe, and all input into CoPilot is used by Microsoft to train the model. For data protection reasons, all staff members are therefore expressly prohibited from using CoPilot. Does the University of Innsbruck recommend the use of certain AI tools? The University of Innsbruck recommends the use of the in-house AI model Academic AI. The model runs in a secure environment and the data entered is not used for training purposes. All information about the service can be found on the homepage of the eCampus of the e-learning department at the ZID. You can find futher information on AI tools for teaching and
Sumber rasmi 3 ↗Petikan asal
research on this blogpost at the Crashkurs E-Didaktik in OLAT run by the e-learning department at the ZID (only available in German). Who pays the licence fees for the use of fee-based AI products? The University of Innsbruck makes the in-house modell Academic AI available to its employees free of charge with a credit of tokens worth €20 per month. Beyond this, there is no central assumption of costs for the use of other AI tools by the university. However, any license fees can be paid from institute, project or department budgets.
Reviewed record
Pernyataan yang disemak
Pernyataan yang disemak: 9
Integriti akademikPernyataan yang disemak: 2
Academic Integrity
The Universität Innsbruck Faculty of Psychology and Sport Science guidelines say AI programs may be used in study work only as a supplement and support to learning, abusive AI use is a violation of good scientific practice, and generative AI use in written work must be described and cited.
Semakan: Disemak oleh ejen
Nilai ternormalisasi: psychsport_ai_supplement_learning_abuse_good_scientific_practice_disclosure_citation
Bukti asal
Bukti 1Der Einsatz von KI-Programmen im Studium ist grundsätzlich gestattet, jedoch nur zur Ergänzung und Unterstützung des Lernprozesses. ... Jegliche Form der missbräuchlichen Nutzung von KI wird als Verstoß gegen die gute wissenschaftliche Praxis betrachtet. ... Wenn generative KI bei der Erstellung von schriftlichen Arbeiten eingesetzt wird, muss die Art der Verwendung beschrieben bzw. erklärt werden ... Des Weiteren müssen von generativer KI erzeugte und übernommene Inhalte in jedem Fall entsprechend zitiert werden.
Paparan setempat only
The faculty guideline permits AI only as learning support, treats abusive use as a good-scientific-practice violation, and requires disclosure and citation of generative AI use in written work.
Academic Integrity
The Universität Innsbruck Faculty of Business and Management guidance says AI-generated content incorporated into a student's own work must be labeled without exception and must not be presented as the student's own work, otherwise plagiarism may occur and later annulment of assessment could result.
Semakan: Disemak oleh ejen
Nilai ternormalisasi: business_faculty_ai_content_labeling_plagiarism_assessment_annulment
Bukti asal
Bukti 1Inhalte von KI-Tools, die in die eigene Arbeit übernommen werden, sind ausnahmslos als solche zu kennzeichnen und dürfen nicht als eigene Leistung ausgegeben werden, da sonst ein Plagiat vorliegt, das später zur Aufhebung der Beurteilung führen könnte.
Paparan setempat only
The Business and Management faculty guidance says incorporated AI-tool content must be labeled and not presented as one's own work, or it may be plagiarism with possible assessment annulment.
PengajaranPernyataan yang disemak: 1
Pengajaran
For teaching and examinations, Universität Innsbruck's FAQ says course leaders may decide which AI tools are permitted unless a faculty has its own rules, should communicate rules clearly, and should explicitly identify permitted aids including AI tools for examinations; unnamed aids are prohibited.
Semakan: Disemak oleh ejen
Nilai ternormalisasi: course_leaders_set_ai_rules_unless_faculty_rules_permitted_exam_aids_must_be_explicit
Bukti asal
Bukti 1Sofern an der Fakultät nicht eigens geregelt, liegt die Verantwortung bei der Lehrveranstaltungsleitung. ... Ob und welche generative KI Tools in einer Lehrveranstaltung von Studierenden verwendet werden dürfen, sollte bereits vor Beginn der Lehrveranstaltung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis bei der Lehrveranstaltungsbeschreibung angegeben werden. Erlaubte Hilfsmittel (inkl. KI‑Tools) in Prüfungen sind zu Beginn der Lehrveranstaltung ... explizit auszuweisen; alle nicht genannten Hilfsmittel sind verboten.
Paparan setempat only
The FAQ says course leaders decide AI-tool permissions unless a faculty rule applies, should list allowed AI use before the course, and must explicitly identify permitted examination aids.
PrivasiPernyataan yang disemak: 1
Privasi
Universität Innsbruck's FAQ advises prompts should be formulated without personal data where possible, confidential data entered into AI generators may no longer be treated as confidential, and freely accessible AI tools should not receive personal or copyright-protected data.
Semakan: Disemak oleh ejen
Nilai ternormalisasi: avoid_personal_confidential_copyright_data_in_public_ai_tools
Bukti asal
Bukti 1Vor diesem Hintergrund ist dazu zu raten, Prompts so frei von personenbezogenen Daten zu formulieren, wie nur möglich und im Zweifelsfall lieber von der Verwendung des Systems abzusehen. ... alles, was in KI-Generatoren eingegeben wird kann potenziell von den Anbietern mitgelesen, gespeichert und genutzt werden. ... Bei frei zugänglichen KI‑Tools dürfen keine personenbezogenen oder urheberrechtlich geschützten Daten eingegeben werden
Paparan setempat only
The FAQ advises avoiding personal data in prompts, treating AI-generator inputs as no longer confidential, and not entering personal or copyright-protected data into freely accessible AI tools.
PenyelidikanPernyataan yang disemak: 1
Penyelidikan
For research and scientific work, Universität Innsbruck's FAQ says good scientific practice applies to AI-tool use, AI use must be made transparent with tool name, scope, and purpose, and AI should not be cited as an author.
Semakan: Disemak oleh ejen
Nilai ternormalisasi: research_ai_use_transparency_tool_name_scope_purpose_no_ai_author
Bukti asal
Bukti 1Bei der Verwendung von KI-Tools gelten an der Universität Innsbruck die Richtlinien der guten wissenschaftlichen Praxis. Die Grundprinzipien der Transparenz und Nachvollziehbarkeit des generierten Wissens müssen auch beim Einsatz generativer KI-Modelle gegeben sein. Es muss daher jede Verwendung von KI-Tools (Name des Tools, Umfang des Einsatzes, Zweck des Einsatzes) bei der Abfassung von wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten an der entsprechenden Stelle zitiert werden. ... Dabei sollte aber die KI-Quelle nicht als Autor zitiert werden
Paparan setempat only
The FAQ applies good scientific practice to AI-tool use and requires transparency about the tool, scope, and purpose while saying AI should not be cited as an author.
Peraturan alat AIPernyataan yang disemak: 3
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Innsbruck Document Analysis Tool is listed for Universität Innsbruck in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Semakan: Disemak oleh ejen
Nilai ternormalisasi: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"University of Innsbruck Document Analysis Tool","description":"University of Innsbruck provides current staff a document analysis tool in its secure AI environment.","howToObtain":"Use the university-provided AI service.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}
Bukti asal
Bukti 1The University of Innsbruck offers its current staff a document analysis tool. The model runs in a secure environment and entered data is not used for training purposes.
Paparan setempat only
The University of Innsbruck offers its current staff a document analysis tool. The model runs in a secure environment and entered data is not used for training purposes.
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Innsbruck OpenAI Chatbot is listed for Universität Innsbruck in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Semakan: Disemak oleh ejen
Nilai ternormalisasi: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"University of Innsbruck OpenAI Chatbot","description":"University of Innsbruck provides current staff a secure chatbot based on OpenAI technology.","howToObtain":"Use the university-provided chatbot service.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}
Bukti asal
Bukti 1The University of Innsbruck offers its current staff a chatbot based on OpenAI technology. The model runs in a secure environment and entered data is not used for training purposes.
Paparan setempat only
The University of Innsbruck offers its current staff a chatbot based on OpenAI technology. The model runs in a secure environment and entered data is not used for training purposes.
Ai Tool Treatment
Universität Innsbruck offers employees with an active employment relationship access to Academic AI in a protected environment, recommends the in-house Academic AI model, and says staff use of Microsoft Copilot is expressly prohibited for data-protection reasons.
Semakan: Disemak oleh ejen
Nilai ternormalisasi: academic_ai_offered_recommended_for_staff_copilot_staff_use_prohibited_privacy
Bukti asal
Bukti 1Die Universität Innsbruck bietet für ihre Mitarbeitenden mit aktivem Dienstverhältnis einen Chatbot basierend auf der Technologie von OpenAI sowie ein Tool zur Dokumenten-Analyse an. Das Modell läuft in einer abgesicherten Umgebung und die eingegebenen Daten werden nicht zu Trainingszwecken verwendet. ... Aus Datenschutzgründen ist daher allen Mitarbeiter:innen die Nutzung von CoPilot ausdrücklich untersagt.
Paparan setempat only
The FAQ says Universität Innsbruck offers Academic AI to employees in a protected environment and expressly prohibits staff use of Copilot for data-protection reasons.
Status sumberPernyataan yang disemak: 1
Source Status
Universität Innsbruck's AI FAQ says it provides an orientation framework on artificial intelligence for students, teachers, and researchers, is not individual legal advice, and is updated continuously.
Semakan: Disemak oleh ejen
Nilai ternormalisasi: ai_faq_orientation_framework_students_teachers_researchers_updated_may_2026
Bukti asal
Bukti 1Die vorliegenden FAQs sollen einen Orientierungsrahmen rund um Fragen zum Thema Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) für Studierende, Lehrende sowie Forschende an der Universität Innsbruck darstellen. Sie ersetzen keine juristsche Beratung im Einzelfall. Die FAQs werden laufend aktualisiert. (Stand Mai 2026)
Paparan setempat only
The FAQ states that it provides an orientation framework on AI for students, teachers, and researchers, not individual legal advice, and is continuously updated.
Source record
Sumber rasmi
Sumber: 6
Buka senarai sumber rasmi
Academic AI
uibk.ac.at
- Hash petikan
- a8808ccf…
FAQs on AI – Universität Innsbruck
uibk.ac.at
- Hash petikan
- 21947fcd…
FAQs rund um das Thema KI an der Universität Innsbruck
uibk.ac.at
- Hash petikan
- 76b96c82…
KI Guidelines
uibk.ac.at
- Hash petikan
- 3a821ae6…
KI und die Universität Innsbruck
uibk.ac.at
- Hash petikan
- 9cadd667…
Umgang mit KI
uibk.ac.at
- Hash petikan
- 83b3c708…
Maklumat rekod, JSON dan petikan
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universität Innsbruck AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universitat-innsbruck
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Buka log perubahanSaved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.