Policy presence
Universität Innsbruck has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Innsbruck, Austria
Universität Innsbruck
Universität Innsbruck is listed as QS 2026 rank =350. Universität Innsbruck has 7 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Universität Innsbruck is listed as QS 2026 rank =350. Universität Innsbruck has 7 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universität Innsbruck as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 7 source-backed claims, including 7 reviewed claims, from 5 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universitat-innsbruck.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Universität Innsbruck has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Universität Innsbruck has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Universität Innsbruck has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Universität Innsbruck has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
Universität Innsbruck has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
Universität Innsbruck has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Named AI services
Universität Innsbruck has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
Universität Innsbruck has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Universität Innsbruck has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Source Status
Universität Innsbruck's AI FAQ says it provides an orientation framework on artificial intelligence for students, teachers, and researchers, is not individual legal advice, and is updated continuously.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_faq_orientation_framework_students_teachers_researchers_updated_may_2026
Original evidence
Evidence 1Die vorliegenden FAQs sollen einen Orientierungsrahmen rund um Fragen zum Thema Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) für Studierende, Lehrende sowie Forschende an der Universität Innsbruck darstellen. Sie ersetzen keine juristsche Beratung im Einzelfall. Die FAQs werden laufend aktualisiert. (Stand Mai 2026)
Localized display only
The FAQ states that it provides an orientation framework on AI for students, teachers, and researchers, not individual legal advice, and is continuously updated.
Teaching
For teaching and examinations, Universität Innsbruck's FAQ says course leaders may decide which AI tools are permitted unless a faculty has its own rules, should communicate rules clearly, and should explicitly identify permitted aids including AI tools for examinations; unnamed aids are prohibited.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: course_leaders_set_ai_rules_unless_faculty_rules_permitted_exam_aids_must_be_explicit
Original evidence
Evidence 1Sofern an der Fakultät nicht eigens geregelt, liegt die Verantwortung bei der Lehrveranstaltungsleitung. ... Ob und welche generative KI Tools in einer Lehrveranstaltung von Studierenden verwendet werden dürfen, sollte bereits vor Beginn der Lehrveranstaltung im Vorlesungsverzeichnis bei der Lehrveranstaltungsbeschreibung angegeben werden. Erlaubte Hilfsmittel (inkl. KI‑Tools) in Prüfungen sind zu Beginn der Lehrveranstaltung ... explizit auszuweisen; alle nicht genannten Hilfsmittel sind verboten.
Localized display only
The FAQ says course leaders decide AI-tool permissions unless a faculty rule applies, should list allowed AI use before the course, and must explicitly identify permitted examination aids.
Ai Tool Treatment
Universität Innsbruck offers employees with an active employment relationship access to Academic AI in a protected environment, recommends the in-house Academic AI model, and says staff use of Microsoft Copilot is expressly prohibited for data-protection reasons.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: academic_ai_offered_recommended_for_staff_copilot_staff_use_prohibited_privacy
Original evidence
Evidence 1Die Universität Innsbruck bietet für ihre Mitarbeitenden mit aktivem Dienstverhältnis einen Chatbot basierend auf der Technologie von OpenAI sowie ein Tool zur Dokumenten-Analyse an. Das Modell läuft in einer abgesicherten Umgebung und die eingegebenen Daten werden nicht zu Trainingszwecken verwendet. ... Aus Datenschutzgründen ist daher allen Mitarbeiter:innen die Nutzung von CoPilot ausdrücklich untersagt.
Localized display only
The FAQ says Universität Innsbruck offers Academic AI to employees in a protected environment and expressly prohibits staff use of Copilot for data-protection reasons.
Research
For research and scientific work, Universität Innsbruck's FAQ says good scientific practice applies to AI-tool use, AI use must be made transparent with tool name, scope, and purpose, and AI should not be cited as an author.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_ai_use_transparency_tool_name_scope_purpose_no_ai_author
Original evidence
Evidence 1Bei der Verwendung von KI-Tools gelten an der Universität Innsbruck die Richtlinien der guten wissenschaftlichen Praxis. Die Grundprinzipien der Transparenz und Nachvollziehbarkeit des generierten Wissens müssen auch beim Einsatz generativer KI-Modelle gegeben sein. Es muss daher jede Verwendung von KI-Tools (Name des Tools, Umfang des Einsatzes, Zweck des Einsatzes) bei der Abfassung von wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten an der entsprechenden Stelle zitiert werden. ... Dabei sollte aber die KI-Quelle nicht als Autor zitiert werden
Localized display only
The FAQ applies good scientific practice to AI-tool use and requires transparency about the tool, scope, and purpose while saying AI should not be cited as an author.
Privacy
Universität Innsbruck's FAQ advises prompts should be formulated without personal data where possible, confidential data entered into AI generators may no longer be treated as confidential, and freely accessible AI tools should not receive personal or copyright-protected data.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: avoid_personal_confidential_copyright_data_in_public_ai_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1Vor diesem Hintergrund ist dazu zu raten, Prompts so frei von personenbezogenen Daten zu formulieren, wie nur möglich und im Zweifelsfall lieber von der Verwendung des Systems abzusehen. ... alles, was in KI-Generatoren eingegeben wird kann potenziell von den Anbietern mitgelesen, gespeichert und genutzt werden. ... Bei frei zugänglichen KI‑Tools dürfen keine personenbezogenen oder urheberrechtlich geschützten Daten eingegeben werden
Localized display only
The FAQ advises avoiding personal data in prompts, treating AI-generator inputs as no longer confidential, and not entering personal or copyright-protected data into freely accessible AI tools.
Academic Integrity
The Universität Innsbruck Faculty of Psychology and Sport Science guidelines say AI programs may be used in study work only as a supplement and support to learning, abusive AI use is a violation of good scientific practice, and generative AI use in written work must be described and cited.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: psychsport_ai_supplement_learning_abuse_good_scientific_practice_disclosure_citation
Original evidence
Evidence 1Der Einsatz von KI-Programmen im Studium ist grundsätzlich gestattet, jedoch nur zur Ergänzung und Unterstützung des Lernprozesses. ... Jegliche Form der missbräuchlichen Nutzung von KI wird als Verstoß gegen die gute wissenschaftliche Praxis betrachtet. ... Wenn generative KI bei der Erstellung von schriftlichen Arbeiten eingesetzt wird, muss die Art der Verwendung beschrieben bzw. erklärt werden ... Des Weiteren müssen von generativer KI erzeugte und übernommene Inhalte in jedem Fall entsprechend zitiert werden.
Localized display only
The faculty guideline permits AI only as learning support, treats abusive use as a good-scientific-practice violation, and requires disclosure and citation of generative AI use in written work.
Academic Integrity
The Universität Innsbruck Faculty of Business and Management guidance says AI-generated content incorporated into a student's own work must be labeled without exception and must not be presented as the student's own work, otherwise plagiarism may occur and later annulment of assessment could result.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: business_faculty_ai_content_labeling_plagiarism_assessment_annulment
Original evidence
Evidence 1Inhalte von KI-Tools, die in die eigene Arbeit übernommen werden, sind ausnahmslos als solche zu kennzeichnen und dürfen nicht als eigene Leistung ausgegeben werden, da sonst ein Plagiat vorliegt, das später zur Aufhebung der Beurteilung führen könnte.
Localized display only
The Business and Management faculty guidance says incorporated AI-tool content must be labeled and not presented as one's own work, or it may be plagiarism with possible assessment annulment.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
5 source attribution
Academic AI
uibk.ac.at
FAQs rund um das Thema KI an der Universität Innsbruck
uibk.ac.at
KI Guidelines
uibk.ac.at
KI und die Universität Innsbruck
uibk.ac.at
Umgang mit KI
uibk.ac.at
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.