source_status
Universität Innsbruck's AI FAQ says it provides an orientation framework on artificial intelligence for students, teachers, and researchers, is not individual legal advice, and is updated continuously.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Change log
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Universität Innsbruck currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
7 claim records
Universität Innsbruck's AI FAQ says it provides an orientation framework on artificial intelligence for students, teachers, and researchers, is not individual legal advice, and is updated continuously.
For teaching and examinations, Universität Innsbruck's FAQ says course leaders may decide which AI tools are permitted unless a faculty has its own rules, should communicate rules clearly, and should explicitly identify permitted aids including AI tools for examinations; unnamed aids are prohibited.
Universität Innsbruck offers employees with an active employment relationship access to Academic AI in a protected environment, recommends the in-house Academic AI model, and says staff use of Microsoft Copilot is expressly prohibited for data-protection reasons.
For research and scientific work, Universität Innsbruck's FAQ says good scientific practice applies to AI-tool use, AI use must be made transparent with tool name, scope, and purpose, and AI should not be cited as an author.
Universität Innsbruck's FAQ advises prompts should be formulated without personal data where possible, confidential data entered into AI generators may no longer be treated as confidential, and freely accessible AI tools should not receive personal or copyright-protected data.
The Universität Innsbruck Faculty of Psychology and Sport Science guidelines say AI programs may be used in study work only as a supplement and support to learning, abusive AI use is a violation of good scientific practice, and generative AI use in written work must be described and cited.
The Universität Innsbruck Faculty of Business and Management guidance says AI-generated content incorporated into a student's own work must be labeled without exception and must not be presented as the student's own work, otherwise plagiarism may occur and later annulment of assessment could result.
5 source attributions
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026