source_status
Universität Innsbruck's AI FAQ says it provides an orientation framework on artificial intelligence for students, teachers, and researchers, is not individual legal advice, and is updated continuously.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Universität Innsbruck
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Universität Innsbruck currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
7 claim records
teaching
For teaching and examinations, Universität Innsbruck's FAQ says course leaders may decide which AI tools are permitted unless a faculty has its own rules, should communicate rules clearly, and should explicitly identify permitted aids including AI tools for examinations; unnamed aids are prohibited.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
Universität Innsbruck offers employees with an active employment relationship access to Academic AI in a protected environment, recommends the in-house Academic AI model, and says staff use of Microsoft Copilot is expressly prohibited for data-protection reasons.
Review: Agent reviewed
research
For research and scientific work, Universität Innsbruck's FAQ says good scientific practice applies to AI-tool use, AI use must be made transparent with tool name, scope, and purpose, and AI should not be cited as an author.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Universität Innsbruck's FAQ advises prompts should be formulated without personal data where possible, confidential data entered into AI generators may no longer be treated as confidential, and freely accessible AI tools should not receive personal or copyright-protected data.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
The Universität Innsbruck Faculty of Psychology and Sport Science guidelines say AI programs may be used in study work only as a supplement and support to learning, abusive AI use is a violation of good scientific practice, and generative AI use in written work must be described and cited.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
The Universität Innsbruck Faculty of Business and Management guidance says AI-generated content incorporated into a student's own work must be labeled without exception and must not be presented as the student's own work, otherwise plagiarism may occur and later annulment of assessment could result.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
5 source attributions
Academic AI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 2:05 PM
FAQs rund um das Thema KI an der Universität Innsbruck
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 2:03 PM
KI Guidelines
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 2:06 PM
KI und die Universität Innsbruck
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 2:03 PM
Umgang mit KI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 2:06 PM