Saskatoon, Canada

University of Saskatchewan

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage11 reviewedEvidence-backed claims11Reviewed11Candidate0Official sources11Source languageen, en-CAPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-saskatchewan.json

Policy profile

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence81%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

University of Saskatchewan has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records3

ALDA (AI Learning Design Assistant)

University of Saskatchewan

Tool
ALDA (AI Learning Design Assistant)
About
ALDA is a USask-designed generative-AI chatbot and text-generation suite for USask educators.
Access
Sign in to ALDA with a USask NSID.
Cost
Freely available.
Availability
Allowed
Review
Agent reviewed
Sources

Lexis+ AI

University of Saskatchewan

Tool
Lexis+ AI
About
Lexis+ AI is an approved, College-of-Law-specific generative-AI legal research and drafting service that requires a request and additional College or School payment.
Access
College of Law users contact their College IT Coordinator; access is by request only.
Cost
Additional payment at the College or School level.
Availability
Conditionally allowed
Review
Agent reviewed
Sources

Microsoft Copilot

University of Saskatchewan

Tool
Microsoft Copilot
About
USask identifies Microsoft Copilot as the generative-AI tool for students, faculty, and staff conducting USask-related work; prompts and results are protected when users sign in.
Access
Sign in through the USask PAWS login.
Cost
Not specified.
Availability
Allowed
Review
Agent reviewed
Sources

Evidence-backed claims

11 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Ai Tool Treatment

ALDA (AI Learning Design Assistant) is listed for University of Saskatchewan in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"ALDA (AI Learning Design Assistant)","description":"ALDA is a USask-designed generative-AI chatbot and text-generation suite for USask educators.","howToObtain":"Sign in to ALDA with a USask NSID.","costToUser":"Freely available.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Bukti asal

Evidence 1
ALDA was designed at USask and is approved for use. It is an AI Learning Design Assistant generative-AI chatbot and suite of apps coded for USask educators, and is freely available with a USask NSID login.

Paparan setempat only

ALDA was designed at USask and is approved for use. It is an AI Learning Design Assistant generative-AI chatbot and suite of apps coded for USask educators, and is freely available with a USask NSID login.

Ai Tool Treatment

Lexis+ AI is listed for University of Saskatchewan in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"Lexis+ AI","description":"Lexis+ AI is an approved, College-of-Law-specific generative-AI legal research and drafting service that requires a request and additional College or School payment.","howToObtain":"College of Law users contact their College IT Coordinator; access is by request only.","costToUser":"Additional payment at the College or School level.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Bukti asal

Evidence 1
Lexis+ AI is approved for use by request only and requires additional payment at the College or School level. It is available within the College of Law; College of Law users contact their College IT Coordinator.

Paparan setempat only

Lexis+ AI is approved for use by request only and requires additional payment at the College or School level. It is available within the College of Law; College of Law users contact their College IT Coordinator.

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Saskatchewan in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"USask identifies Microsoft Copilot as the generative-AI tool for students, faculty, and staff conducting USask-related work; prompts and results are protected when users sign in.","howToObtain":"Sign in through the USask PAWS login.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Bukti asal

Evidence 1
Copilot is the Generative AI tool for students, faculty and staff to use to conduct USask-related work. When logged in, search prompts and results are protected, and data and chat history are not used to train future AI models.

Paparan setempat only

Copilot is the Generative AI tool for students, faculty and staff to use to conduct USask-related work. When logged in, search prompts and results are protected, and data and chat history are not used to train future AI models.

Ai Tool Treatment

USask academic-integrity guidance says GenAI detection tools are not reliable and that no detection tool has been approved for use at the University of Saskatchewan.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: genai_detection_tools_not_approved

Bukti asal

Evidence 1
Tools to detect text or other outputs produced by GenAI are not reliable. False accusations can be devastating. No detection tool has been approved for use at the University of Saskatchewan.

Source Status

The University of Saskatchewan publishes central AI principles and role-specific AI guidelines for students, educators, researchers, and administrators.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: central_ai_principles_and_role_guidelines

Bukti asal

Evidence 1
USask has practical guidance for how principles may be applied in four common roles (Educators, Researchers, Students and Administrators) at USask.

Privacy

USask administrative AI guidance strongly recommends not inputting personal information or confidential data into AI tools and says administrators should prioritize USask-approved AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: administrative_ai_privacy_approved_tools

Bukti asal

Evidence 1
It is strongly recommended that you do not input personal information or confidential data into an AI tool. You should prioritize using AI tools approved by USask to protect equity, safety, and security.

Teaching

USask LTE Toolkit guidance says instructors planning student GenAI use should use approved or reviewed tools when accounts are required and says using GenAI to determine final grades is strongly discouraged.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: teaching_genai_approved_tools_final_grades_discouraged

Bukti asal

Evidence 1
If students are required to create an account, please use a tool that is listed in the A-Z Tool List as Approved for Academic Use or work through the process to Request a new LTE tool prior to any student use. Using GenAI to determine students’ final grades is strongly discouraged.

Academic Integrity

USask student AI guidance says students should use AI to support, not replace or misrepresent, their learning, follow instructor rules, and avoid inputting personal information or confidential data into AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: student_ai_integrity_privacy_guidance

Bukti asal

Evidence 1
Use AI to support your learning, not to replace or misrepresent your learning. Action: Follow the rules laid out by instructors about use of AI to act with integrity and avoid academic misconduct. It is strongly recommended that you do not input personal information or confidential data into an AI tool.

Teaching

USask educator AI guidance says educators should discuss AI-use expectations with learners and remain responsible for assessing student work, feedback quality, and grades.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: educator_ai_expectations_assessment_responsibility

Bukti asal

Evidence 1
You should discuss expectations with learners about appropriate AI use and its impact on learning, including accountability for any use of AI output, and disclosing AI use. You are responsible for assessing student work, feedback quality, and establishing student grades, although you can be supported by AI.

Research

USask research AI guidance says researchers are accountable for output integrity and should consider tool security, protect confidential or sensitive information, and be transparent about AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: research_ai_accountability_data_security_transparency

Bukti asal

Evidence 1
Researchers recognize that data input into AI data processers may be accessed by others resulting in privacy breaches and/or disclosure of confidential information. Researchers consider the security of AI tools to prevent the leakage, accidental or otherwise, of confidential, proprietary, or sensitive information. Researchers should be transparent about their use of AI throughout the research lifecycle.

Source Status

A USask-hosted CGPS draft framework says graduate programs should determine whether and how generative AI may be used by graduate students and incorporate permitted/not-permitted use information into program guidelines.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: cgps_draft_graduate_program_genai_framework

Bukti asal

Evidence 1
CGPS Council deems it the responsibility of programs to determine whether and how generative AI may be used by graduate students and that CGPS Faculty Council instructs graduate programs to incorporate information on the types of generative AI that are permitted or not permitted.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

11 source attribution

AI at USask - Artificial Intelligence at USask

ai.usask.ca

Snapshot hash
e42c2ec1153c5a550a22b5c6c98768e3cc269108b91c200d1a0187f0cd8028e3

Change log

Last checkedJul 19, 2026Last changedJul 19, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities