Glasgow, United Kingdom

University of Glasgow

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Beoordeelde beweringen

13 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Glasgow in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen97%

Genormaliseerde waarde: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot Chat","description":"University-approved Copilot Chat with enterprise data protection for University data.","howToObtain":"Use from Microsoft 365, Teams or the mobile Copilot app while logged in with UofG credentials.","costToUser":"Not stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
University of Glasgow identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as its University-approved Generative AI platform and the only AI service approved for University data. It is available from Microsoft 365, Teams and the mobile app when logged in with UofG credentials and enterprise data protection.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

University of Glasgow identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as its University-approved Generative AI platform and the only AI service approved for University data. It is available from Microsoft 365, Teams and the mobile app when logged in with UofG credentials and enterprise data protection.

Academic Integrity

Regulation 32 states that assessed student work should not contain content produced by another person, website, software, or AI tool except where AI use is explicitly permitted.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%

Genormaliseerde waarde: assessed_work_no_ai_generated_content_except_explicit_permission

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
All work submitted by students for assessment is accepted on the understanding that it is the student's own effort. This means students' work should not contain content that has been produced by another person, website, software or Artificial intelligence (AI) tool (except where AI use is explicitly permitted).

Security Review

University of Glasgow IT guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as the only AI service approved for use with University data and says users must be logged in with UofG credentials for approved use.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%

Genormaliseerde waarde: copilot_chat_only_ai_service_approved_for_university_data

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Microsoft Copilot Chat is a Generative AI tool that uses the same large language models as Open AI's ChatGPT, but with added security. It is the only AI service approved for use with University data.

Academic Integrity

Regulation 32 says use of websites or generative AI software that generates answers or references is prohibited, while some Schools may allow AI tools for specific purposes and any AI use must be referenced.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%

Genormaliseerde waarde: generated_answers_references_prohibited_specific_school_exceptions_referenced

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Using any website or generative artificial intelligence (AI) software that generates answers or references is prohibited. In some Schools, AI tools may be used in some circumstances and for specific purposes, but students must not misuse AI tools outwith specific assessment instructions. Any use of AI must be referenced in the work for transparency.

Onderzoek

University of Glasgow researcher guidance states that any use of generative AI tools by staff, students, and researchers must be accompanied by critical analysis and oversight by the user.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%

Genormaliseerde waarde: genai_research_use_requires_critical_analysis_oversight

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
There is therefore one overriding principle, which applies to all staff, students, and researchers at the University: any use of generative AI tools must be accompanied by critical analysis and oversight on the part of the user.

Academic Integrity

University of Glasgow student guidance says using AI or other computational aids in university work without acknowledging the input counts as academic misconduct.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%

Genormaliseerde waarde: ai_use_without_acknowledgement_academic_misconduct

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
It is important to note that using any form of AI or other computational aids in your university coursework, study, exams, or research without acknowledging that input counts as academic misconduct.

Privacy

University of Glasgow IT guidance says confidential or sensitive information belonging to the university or a third party should not be put into AI tools.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%

Genormaliseerde waarde: confidential_sensitive_information_not_into_ai_tools

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Confidential or sensitive information (including, for example, IP) belonging to the University or any third party should not be put into AI tools.

Onderzoek

University of Glasgow researcher guidance says AI tools used as part of research design, methods, disciplinary toolkit, or research subject should be covered by relevant ethical approval and data protection processes.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen93%

Genormaliseerde waarde: research_ai_methods_subject_require_ethics_data_protection_processes

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Where AI tools form part of your research design or methods, the tool kit within your discipline, or are a subject of your research, your use of them as a researcher should be covered by relevant ethical approval and data protection processes.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Glasgow student guidance says the university does not seek to prohibit student AI-tool use generally and instead supports effective, ethical, critical, and transparent use.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen92%

Genormaliseerde waarde: student_genai_use_supported_with_ethics_transparency

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Consequently, rather than seek to prohibit your use of these tools, we want to support you in learning how to use them effectively, ethically, critically, and transparently.

Onderwijs

University of Glasgow staff guidance says Schools are advised by central policy to decide locally whether AI is allowed not at all, under specified circumstances, or without restriction with acknowledgement.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen90%

Genormaliseerde waarde: schools_decide_local_ai_allowed_levels

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Schools are advised by central UofG policy to first decide locally on which of 3 levels of AI are allowable in their courses: not at all; under certain circumstances as outlined by the School; or without restriction (though it must always be acknowledged where used).

Privacy

University of Glasgow's PGR GenAI checklist advises PGR students to avoid uploading confidential or sensitive information, including research data and peer review content, to AI tools.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen90%

Genormaliseerde waarde: pgrs_avoid_confidential_sensitive_research_peer_review_content_ai_tools

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Avoid uploading confidential or sensitive information to an AI tool (this includes research data and peer review content).

Onderwijs

University of Glasgow's GenAI assessment guidance is intended to explain university policy on GenAI tools in assessment practice and outlines three assessment-use scenarios.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen89%

Genormaliseerde waarde: genai_assessment_guidance_three_scenarios

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
The purpose of this guidance is to help you understand the University's policy on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in relation to assessment practice. It outlines three scenarios that detail how GenAI can be used in assessment.

Onderwijs

University of Glasgow assessment-design guidance says GenAI use in assessment should not always be treated as plagiarism and encourages assessment design that lets students demonstrate skills beyond knowledge recall.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen86%

Genormaliseerde waarde: assessment_design_consider_genai_beyond_plagiarism

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
It is important to recognise that the use of GenAI in assessment should not, in all cases, be treated as plagiarism. Rather we should carefully consider how we design assessment to ensure that students can demonstrate skills beyond purely knowledge recall.

Source record

Officiële bronnen

9 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Beoordelenagent reviewedVertrouwen97%Snapshot statusNiet gepubliceerdJSONOpenbaar JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Glasgow AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-glasgow

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Wijzigingslogboek openen