University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Chapel Hill, United States

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: =140Updated2026年7月19日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

10 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Adobe Firefly is listed for University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"adobe_firefly","rawToolName":"Adobe Firefly","description":"Adobe Firefly available through the UNC Creative Cloud subscription.","howToObtain":"Use the UNC Creative Cloud subscription.","costToUser":"Free for students and instructional faculty/staff; $25/year for non-instructional faculty/staff.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

最后检查时间
2026年7月16日
最后更改时间
2026年7月16日

原始证据

证据 1
UNC's official AI Tools catalogue lists Adobe Firefly as accessible through the UNC Creative Cloud subscription, free for students and instructional faculty and staff and $25/year for non-instructional faculty and staff.

本地化显示 only

UNC's official AI Tools catalogue lists Adobe Firefly as accessible through the UNC Creative Cloud subscription, free for students and instructional faculty and staff and $25/year for non-instructional faculty and staff.

来源语言
English (en-US)
快照哈希
049ed831…
已检索
2026年7月16日

Ai Tool Treatment

PromptLab is listed for University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"PromptLab","description":"Secure UNC access to advanced large language models from multiple providers.","howToObtain":"Sign in with an Onyen.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

最后检查时间
2026年7月16日
最后更改时间
2026年7月16日

原始证据

证据 1
UNC's official AI Tools catalogue lists PromptLab as secure access to advanced LLMs from multiple leading providers and says it is available to anyone with an Onyen.

本地化显示 only

UNC's official AI Tools catalogue lists PromptLab as secure access to advanced LLMs from multiple leading providers and says it is available to anyone with an Onyen.

来源语言
English (en-US)
快照哈希
049ed831…
已检索
2026年7月16日

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (with Data Protection) is listed for University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (with Data Protection)","description":"Institutionally scoped Copilot Chat with UNC data protection.","howToObtain":"Sign in using an Onyen UNC account.","costToUser":"Basic licence is included; some users have a paid premium licence.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

最后检查时间
2026年7月16日
最后更改时间
2026年7月16日

原始证据

证据 1
UNC's official ITS calls Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat an institutionally-scoped tool, says it is available to anyone with an Onyen and that everyone at UNC has the basic licence.

本地化显示 only

UNC's official ITS calls Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat an institutionally-scoped tool, says it is available to anyone with an Onyen and that everyone at UNC has the basic licence.

来源语言
English (en-US)
快照哈希
049ed831…
已检索
2026年7月16日

Security Review

UNC-Chapel Hill's administrative generative AI guidance says sensitive information should not be entered into generative AI tools unless the Information Security Office has completed a risk assessment and the Data Governance Oversight Group has approved the tool for sensitive information.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: sensitive-information-requires-iso-dgog-approval

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
Do not enter sensitive information (as defined by the UNC-Chapel Hill Information Classification Standard) into generative AI tools unless the University’s Information Security Office (ISO) has conducted a risk assessment of the generative AI tool and the University’s Data Governance Oversight Group (DGOG) has approved the tool to handle sensitive information.
来源语言
English (en-US)
快照哈希
64b070af…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Staff Generative AI Usage Guidance, Protecting Confidential, Copyrighted, or Personal Data

教学

UNC-Chapel Hill's faculty grading and assessment guidance says students must be able to request a full instructor-led review if they disagree with an AI-generated grade or have concerns about automated feedback.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: student-right-to-instructor-review-of-ai-generated-grade

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
Students must be able to request a full instructor-led review if they disagree with an AI- generated grade or have concerns about automated feedback, without additional scrutiny, justification, or penalty.
来源语言
English (en-US)
快照哈希
9c6c27e1…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Guidance for Faculty Use of AI in Grading and Assessment, Transparency with Students

隐私

UNC-Chapel Hill's research guidance treats entering private or confidential information, research data, grant proposals, or analytical results into public generative AI tools as a public disclosure of that information.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: public-ai-inputs-treated-as-public-disclosure

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
Uploading information (e.g., research data, grant proposals, unpublished manuscripts, or analytical results) to a public AI tool is equivalent to releasing it publicly; thus, before any information from you or another individual is uploaded to a public AI tool, appropriate steps must be taken to ensure that the disclosure of that information is consistent with all rules and laws related to the handling of private information.
来源语言
English (en-US)
快照哈希
1d0574d9…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Research Use Guidance, limitations and risks

教学

UNC-Chapel Hill's faculty grading and assessment guidance says AI systems used for grading or feedback must be institutionally approved and compliant with data security and privacy standards; faculty using GenAI for grading retain full responsibility for evaluative decisions and feedback.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: ai-grading-approved-systems-and-faculty-accountability

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
Faculty must ensure that any AI system used for grading or feedback is institutionally approved and compliant with data security and privacy standards. Uploading student work to consumer-grade AI platforms not contracted by the university is inconsistent with student privacy laws and university policy.
来源语言
English (en-US)
快照哈希
9c6c27e1…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Guidance for Faculty Use of AI in Grading and Assessment, Privacy and Intellectual Property

研究

UNC-Chapel Hill's research generative AI guidance applies to members of the research community involved in research under the auspices of the University, including faculty, staff, students, guest researchers, collaborators, and consultants.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%

标准化值: research-community-guidance

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
This guidance applies to all members of the research community, including faculty, staff (SHRA and EHRA non-faculty), students (undergraduate, graduate and professional), guest researchers (e.g., unpaid volunteers, interns, and visiting scholars), collaborators, and consultants involved in research occurring under the auspices of the University.
来源语言
English (en-US)
快照哈希
1d0574d9…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Research Generative AI Usage Guidance, opening guidance scope

教学

UNC-Chapel Hill says faculty should clearly explain when and how AI tools are used in assessment evaluation, including what comes from AI and what comes from instructor judgment.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: Faculty should disclose AI use in assessment evaluation and distinguish AI-supported evaluation from instructor judgment.

最后检查时间
2026年5月25日
最后更改时间
2026年5月26日

原始证据

证据 1
Faculty should clearly explain to students when and how AI tools are used in support of assessment evaluation. Students should understand which parts of their evaluation come from AI and which come from the instructor's own judgment.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
9c6c27e1…
已检索
2026年5月25日
证据定位器
Transparency with Students

教学

UNC-Chapel Hill faculty guidance encourages instructors to state course and assignment AI expectations in the syllabus and tells Carolina students to follow the specific AI guidelines in that syllabus.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: faculty-syllabus-ai-use-guidance

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
Conveying your stance on students’ use of AI in your course is important; it clarifies your expectations and ensures that any use of AI supports rather than frustrates your learning objectives.

本地化显示 only

The same page's syllabus starter language tells students to follow specific AI guidelines in the syllabus and check with the instructor if unsure.

来源语言
English (en-US)
快照哈希
2e373948…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Developing AI Guidance for Faculty, introduction and syllabus starter language

Source record

官方来源

6 sources

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (with Data Protection) - Information Technology Services

its.unc.edu

快照哈希值
049ed831…
Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-north-carolina-at-chapel-hill

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志