public-release-20260526-001
与 public-release-20260524-001 相比。
大学 of North Carolina at Chapel Hill public-release-20260526-001 差异
将 public-release-20260524-001 与 public-release-20260526-001 进行比较。
变更日志
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill currently has 10 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年7月19日. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 4 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
Combining 2 public release diffs for this university. Each section below keeps the original release-to-release comparison.
2 public release diffs
与 public-release-20260524-001 相比。
将 public-release-20260524-001 与 public-release-20260526-001 进行比较。
与 public-release-20260714-002 相比。
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
10 声明 条记录
Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat (with Data Protection) is listed for University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
PromptLab is listed for University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Adobe Firefly is listed for University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
UNC-Chapel Hill says faculty should clearly explain when and how AI tools are used in assessment evaluation, including what comes from AI and what comes from instructor judgment.
UNC-Chapel Hill's administrative generative AI guidance says sensitive information should not be entered into generative AI tools unless the Information Security Office has completed a risk assessment and the Data Governance Oversight Group has approved the tool for sensitive information.
UNC-Chapel Hill's faculty grading and assessment guidance says students must be able to request a full instructor-led review if they disagree with an AI-generated grade or have concerns about automated feedback.
UNC-Chapel Hill's research guidance treats entering private or confidential information, research data, grant proposals, or analytical results into public generative AI tools as a public disclosure of that information.
UNC-Chapel Hill's faculty grading and assessment guidance says AI systems used for grading or feedback must be institutionally approved and compliant with data security and privacy standards; faculty using GenAI for grading retain full responsibility for evaluative decisions and feedback.
UNC-Chapel Hill's research generative AI guidance applies to members of the research community involved in research under the auspices of the University, including faculty, staff, students, guest researchers, collaborators, and consultants.
UNC-Chapel Hill faculty guidance encourages instructors to state course and assignment AI expectations in the syllabus and tells Carolina students to follow the specific AI guidelines in that syllabus.
6 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月16日 01:47
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月14日 14:12
official_pdf Source Last-Modified 2026年3月4日 19:34
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月16日 01:48
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月14日 14:12
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月14日 14:12