Amman, Jordan

Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan

记录摘要

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on 2026年6月12日 and last changed on 2026年6月12日. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. The entity-level confidence is 93%.

政策状态Reviewed evidence-backed record声明覆盖范围4 reviewed官方来源3来源语言en
审计与来源追溯详情
审核: 智能体已审核有证据支持的声明4已审核4候选0公开 JSON/api/public/v1/universities/al-zaytoonah-university-of-jordan.json

政策档案

覆盖范围评分45/100覆盖范围标签partial public coverage审核: 机器候选分析置信度76%

课程作业

此档案中不存在关于课程作业中使用人工智能的基于来源的公开主张。

当前公开跟踪记录不包含关于课程作业、任务或教学大纲层面人工智能使用的主张证据。

未提及机器候选置信度0%证据0来源0

考试

此档案中不存在关于考试中使用人工智能的基于来源的公开主张。

当前公开跟踪记录不包含关于考试、测验、小测或考试条件的主张证据。

未提及机器候选置信度0%证据0来源0

隐私与数据录入

此档案中不存在关于隐私或数据录入限制的基于来源的公开主张。

当前公开跟踪记录不包含关于将个人、机密、敏感、受监管或学生数据输入人工智能工具的主张证据。

未提及机器候选置信度0%证据0来源0

已批准的工具

此档案中不存在识别已批准或授权人工智能工具的基于来源的公开主张。

当前公开跟踪记录不包含识别机构批准、许可、采购或企业级人工智能工具的主张证据。

未提及机器候选置信度0%证据0来源0

命名式 AI 服务

此档案中不存在提及特定人工智能服务的基于来源的公开主张。

当前公开跟踪记录不包含命名特定人工智能服务的主张证据。

未提及机器候选置信度0%证据0来源0

教学指导

此档案中不存在关于教学指南的基于来源的公开主张。

当前公开跟踪记录不包含关于教师、课堂、评估设计或教学大纲指导的主张证据。

未提及机器候选置信度0%证据0来源0

安全与采购

此档案中不存在关于人工智能安全审查或采购的基于来源的公开主张。

当前公开跟踪记录不包含关于安全审查、采购、供应商批准、风险评估、身份验证、单点登录或企业许可的主张证据。

未提及机器候选置信度0%证据0来源0

有证据支持的声明

4 经证据支持的公开主张

研究

The ZUJ Journal of Legal Studies AI-tool policy permits AI use only for language editing, proofreading, grammar or spelling correction, rephrasing without changing meaning, and summarizing researcher-written text; it prohibits using AI to generate scientific content, manipulate data or figures, invent references, write conclusions or analysis, or submit unverified AI-generated content.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: journal_legal_studies_ai_limited_language_support_prohibits_content_data_references_conclusions_unverified_content

原始证据

证据 1
Permitted Uses of AI Tools AI may be used only for: Language editing and proofreading; Correcting grammatical or spelling errors; Rephrasing text without altering meaning; Summarizing texts written by the researcher. Prohibited Uses AI must not be used for: Generating scientific content in whole or in part; Creating or manipulating data or figures; Inventing references; Writing conclusions or conducting analysis; Submitting AI-generated content without scientific verification.

研究

The ZUJ Journal of Legal Studies AI-tool policy sets an AI-generated-content limit of 35%, a similarity-index limit of 30%, requires authors to disclose AI use and assume responsibility for AI errors or plagiarism, and says the journal uses Turnitin AI Detector with possible sanctions including rejection, author bans, notifying the author's institution, or retraction.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%

标准化值: journal_legal_studies_ai_content_limit_similarity_limit_disclosure_turnitin_sanctions

原始证据

证据 1
AI-generated content must not exceed 35%. Similarity Index must not exceed 30%. Editors may reject any manuscript suspected of containing AI-generated material. Authors must: Confirm originality of ideas and results; Review AI-edited content; Disclose AI usage; Assume responsibility for plagiarism or AI errors. Verification Tools The journal uses AI-detection and plagiarism tools, including: Turnitin AI Detector. Violation Penalty Possible sanctions include: Rejection without review; Author ban; Notifying the author's institution; Retraction of published papers.

研究

The Al-Zaytoonah University Journal of Business ethics page requires authors to disclose AI-tool use in manuscript preparation and says AI-generated content should be reviewed and verified by the authors.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: business_journal_authors_disclose_ai_tools_review_verify_ai_generated_content

原始证据

证据 1
Use of Artificial Intelligence Authors must disclose the use of AI tools in the preparation of manuscripts. AI-generated content must be properly reviewed and verified by the authors.

Source Status

The official Students' guidebook 2025/2026 provides general student and thesis academic-integrity context, including plagiarism checks and discipline rules, but this crawl did not locate an AI-specific student academic-integrity rule in the guidebook text.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度82%

标准化值: student_guidebook_general_integrity_context_no_ai_specific_student_rule_found_in_guidebook_text

原始证据

证据 1
Checking for plagiarism in master's theses before and after the defense is the responsibility of the Deanship of Graduate Studies ... ensuring that the plagiarism percentage does not exceed the allowed limit of 30%. Subject to Article (42) ... cases of plagiarism or doubt thereof shall be referred to the Theses Ethics committee.

本地化显示 only

The guidebook has general plagiarism and thesis-ethics rules. Full-text checks for AI-specific terms did not locate an AI-specific student academic-integrity rule in this PDF.

候选声明

0 机器或待审声明

AI 工具

衍生工具记录0

该记录目前尚未发布工具级别的证据。广泛提及的人工智能工具未扩展为具名工具的结论。

官方来源

3 来源归属

变更日志

最后检查时间2026年6月12日最后更改时间2026年6月12日打开变更日志

更正

返回大学列表