政策存在情况
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan 拥有 3 条关于 政策存在情况 的源支持公共主张s;确定性分析状态:不明确。
Amman, Jordan
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on 2026年6月12日 and last changed on 2026年6月12日. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. The entity-level confidence is 93%.
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan 拥有 3 条关于 政策存在情况 的源支持公共主张s;确定性分析状态:不明确。
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan 拥有 2 条关于 AI 披露 的源支持公共主张s;确定性分析状态:推荐。
此档案中不存在关于课程作业中使用人工智能的基于来源的公开主张。
当前公开跟踪记录不包含关于课程作业、任务或教学大纲层面人工智能使用的主张证据。
此档案中不存在关于考试中使用人工智能的基于来源的公开主张。
当前公开跟踪记录不包含关于考试、测验、小测或考试条件的主张证据。
此档案中不存在关于隐私或数据录入限制的基于来源的公开主张。
当前公开跟踪记录不包含关于将个人、机密、敏感、受监管或学生数据输入人工智能工具的主张证据。
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan 拥有 2 条关于 学术诚信 的源支持公共主张s;确定性分析状态:受限。
此档案中不存在识别已批准或授权人工智能工具的基于来源的公开主张。
当前公开跟踪记录不包含识别机构批准、许可、采购或企业级人工智能工具的主张证据。
此档案中不存在提及特定人工智能服务的基于来源的公开主张。
当前公开跟踪记录不包含命名特定人工智能服务的主张证据。
此档案中不存在关于教学指南的基于来源的公开主张。
当前公开跟踪记录不包含关于教师、课堂、评估设计或教学大纲指导的主张证据。
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan 拥有 3 条关于 研究指南 的源支持公共主张s;确定性分析状态:受限。
此档案中不存在关于人工智能安全审查或采购的基于来源的公开主张。
当前公开跟踪记录不包含关于安全审查、采购、供应商批准、风险评估、身份验证、单点登录或企业许可的主张证据。
4 经证据支持的公开主张
研究
标准化值: journal_legal_studies_ai_limited_language_support_prohibits_content_data_references_conclusions_unverified_content
原始证据
证据 1Permitted Uses of AI Tools AI may be used only for: Language editing and proofreading; Correcting grammatical or spelling errors; Rephrasing text without altering meaning; Summarizing texts written by the researcher. Prohibited Uses AI must not be used for: Generating scientific content in whole or in part; Creating or manipulating data or figures; Inventing references; Writing conclusions or conducting analysis; Submitting AI-generated content without scientific verification.
研究
标准化值: journal_legal_studies_ai_content_limit_similarity_limit_disclosure_turnitin_sanctions
原始证据
证据 1AI-generated content must not exceed 35%. Similarity Index must not exceed 30%. Editors may reject any manuscript suspected of containing AI-generated material. Authors must: Confirm originality of ideas and results; Review AI-edited content; Disclose AI usage; Assume responsibility for plagiarism or AI errors. Verification Tools The journal uses AI-detection and plagiarism tools, including: Turnitin AI Detector. Violation Penalty Possible sanctions include: Rejection without review; Author ban; Notifying the author's institution; Retraction of published papers.
研究
标准化值: business_journal_authors_disclose_ai_tools_review_verify_ai_generated_content
原始证据
证据 1Use of Artificial Intelligence Authors must disclose the use of AI tools in the preparation of manuscripts. AI-generated content must be properly reviewed and verified by the authors.
Source Status
标准化值: student_guidebook_general_integrity_context_no_ai_specific_student_rule_found_in_guidebook_text
原始证据
证据 1Checking for plagiarism in master's theses before and after the defense is the responsibility of the Deanship of Graduate Studies ... ensuring that the plagiarism percentage does not exceed the allowed limit of 30%. Subject to Article (42) ... cases of plagiarism or doubt thereof shall be referred to the Theses Ethics committee.
本地化显示 only
The guidebook has general plagiarism and thesis-ethics rules. Full-text checks for AI-specific terms did not locate an AI-specific student academic-integrity rule in this PDF.
0 机器或待审声明
该记录目前尚未发布工具级别的证据。广泛提及的人工智能工具未扩展为具名工具的结论。
3 来源归属
zuj.edu.jo
zjjb.zuj.edu.jo
journals.zuj.edu.jo