变更日志

Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年6月12日. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 4 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的4证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源3已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan combined release 差异

将 public-release-20260526-003 与 public-release-20260612-001 进行比较。

+18-0
11 # Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+research: The ZUJ Journal of Legal Studies AI-tool policy permits AI use only for language editing, proofreading, grammar or spelling correction, rephrasing without changing meaning, and summarizing researcher-written text; it prohibits using AI to generate scientific content, manipulate data or figures, invent references, write conclusions or analysis, or submit unverified AI-generated content.
5+Evidence (en, 806f04005b63): Permitted Uses of AI Tools AI may be used only for: Language editing and proofreading; Correcting grammatical or spelling errors; Rephrasing text without altering meaning; Summarizing texts written by the researcher. Prohibited Uses AI must not be used for: Generating scientific content in whole or in part; Creating or manipulating data or figures; Inventing references; Writing conclusions or conducting analysis; Submitting AI-generated content without scientific verification.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-12T12:39:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+research: The ZUJ Journal of Legal Studies AI-tool policy sets an AI-generated-content limit of 35%, a similarity-index limit of 30%, requires authors to disclose AI use and assume responsibility for AI errors or plagiarism, and says the journal uses Turnitin AI Detector with possible sanctions including rejection, author bans, notifying the author's institution, or retraction.
10+Evidence (en, 806f04005b63): AI-generated content must not exceed 35%. Similarity Index must not exceed 30%. Editors may reject any manuscript suspected of containing AI-generated material. Authors must: Confirm originality of ideas and results; Review AI-edited content; Disclose AI usage; Assume responsibility for plagiarism or AI errors. Verification Tools The journal uses AI-detection and plagiarism tools, including: Turnitin AI Detector. Violation Penalty Possible sanctions include: Rejection without review; Author ban; Notifying the author's institution; Retraction of published papers.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-12T12:39:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+source_status: The official Students' guidebook 2025/2026 provides general student and thesis academic-integrity context, including plagiarism checks and discipline rules, but this crawl did not locate an AI-specific student academic-integrity rule in the guidebook text.
15+Evidence (en, c2114f574764): Checking for plagiarism in master's theses before and after the defense is the responsibility of the Deanship of Graduate Studies ... ensuring that the plagiarism percentage does not exceed the allowed limit of 30%. Subject to Article (42) ... cases of plagiarism or doubt thereof shall be referred to the Theses Ethics committee.
16+Source Last-Modified: 2025-11-12T10:06:01.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+research: The Al-Zaytoonah University Journal of Business ethics page requires authors to disclose AI-tool use in manuscript preparation and says AI-generated content should be reviewed and verified by the authors.
20+Evidence (en, 637327ac6602): Use of Artificial Intelligence Authors must disclose the use of AI tools in the preparation of manuscripts. AI-generated content must be properly reviewed and verified by the authors.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-12T12:39:00.000Z
1022 ## Source attribution added
1123 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
24+Source https://journals.zuj.edu.jo/zujjls/EN_Publish_Ethics.aspx snapshot 806f04005b63604311077ea56a3b854a66362f99995a6ec48d10d19c8b313cb5
25+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-12T12:39:00.000Z
1226 ## Source attribution added
1327 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
28+Source https://www.zuj.edu.jo/ZUJ-CMS/Uploaded_Files/Documents_638985495612796697.pdf snapshot c2114f574764e1071188d82747facf036f115fab4d6a0f821ec4c35a8ad76fb9
29+Source Last-Modified: 2025-11-12T10:06:01.000Z
1430 ## Source attribution added
1531 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
32+Source https://zjjb.zuj.edu.jo/index.php/zjjb/Ethics snapshot 637327ac66028c90a291ac63ef7f3a62b9ac30b6065f10312a6a6bfdae1edcc3
33+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-12T12:39:00.000Z

版本历史

1 公开发布差异

public-release-20260612-001

与 public-release-20260526-003 相比。

政策文本0新提取的4源快照0源文本0

Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan public-release-20260612-001 差异

将 public-release-20260526-003 与 public-release-20260612-001 进行比较。

+18-0
11 # Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+research: The ZUJ Journal of Legal Studies AI-tool policy permits AI use only for language editing, proofreading, grammar or spelling correction, rephrasing without changing meaning, and summarizing researcher-written text; it prohibits using AI to generate scientific content, manipulate data or figures, invent references, write conclusions or analysis, or submit unverified AI-generated content.
5+Evidence (en, 806f04005b63): Permitted Uses of AI Tools AI may be used only for: Language editing and proofreading; Correcting grammatical or spelling errors; Rephrasing text without altering meaning; Summarizing texts written by the researcher. Prohibited Uses AI must not be used for: Generating scientific content in whole or in part; Creating or manipulating data or figures; Inventing references; Writing conclusions or conducting analysis; Submitting AI-generated content without scientific verification.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-12T12:39:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+research: The ZUJ Journal of Legal Studies AI-tool policy sets an AI-generated-content limit of 35%, a similarity-index limit of 30%, requires authors to disclose AI use and assume responsibility for AI errors or plagiarism, and says the journal uses Turnitin AI Detector with possible sanctions including rejection, author bans, notifying the author's institution, or retraction.
10+Evidence (en, 806f04005b63): AI-generated content must not exceed 35%. Similarity Index must not exceed 30%. Editors may reject any manuscript suspected of containing AI-generated material. Authors must: Confirm originality of ideas and results; Review AI-edited content; Disclose AI usage; Assume responsibility for plagiarism or AI errors. Verification Tools The journal uses AI-detection and plagiarism tools, including: Turnitin AI Detector. Violation Penalty Possible sanctions include: Rejection without review; Author ban; Notifying the author's institution; Retraction of published papers.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-12T12:39:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+source_status: The official Students' guidebook 2025/2026 provides general student and thesis academic-integrity context, including plagiarism checks and discipline rules, but this crawl did not locate an AI-specific student academic-integrity rule in the guidebook text.
15+Evidence (en, c2114f574764): Checking for plagiarism in master's theses before and after the defense is the responsibility of the Deanship of Graduate Studies ... ensuring that the plagiarism percentage does not exceed the allowed limit of 30%. Subject to Article (42) ... cases of plagiarism or doubt thereof shall be referred to the Theses Ethics committee.
16+Source Last-Modified: 2025-11-12T10:06:01.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+research: The Al-Zaytoonah University Journal of Business ethics page requires authors to disclose AI-tool use in manuscript preparation and says AI-generated content should be reviewed and verified by the authors.
20+Evidence (en, 637327ac6602): Use of Artificial Intelligence Authors must disclose the use of AI tools in the preparation of manuscripts. AI-generated content must be properly reviewed and verified by the authors.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-12T12:39:00.000Z
1022 ## Source attribution added
1123 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
24+Source https://journals.zuj.edu.jo/zujjls/EN_Publish_Ethics.aspx snapshot 806f04005b63604311077ea56a3b854a66362f99995a6ec48d10d19c8b313cb5
25+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-12T12:39:00.000Z
1226 ## Source attribution added
1327 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
28+Source https://www.zuj.edu.jo/ZUJ-CMS/Uploaded_Files/Documents_638985495612796697.pdf snapshot c2114f574764e1071188d82747facf036f115fab4d6a0f821ec4c35a8ad76fb9
29+Source Last-Modified: 2025-11-12T10:06:01.000Z
1430 ## Source attribution added
1531 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
32+Source https://zjjb.zuj.edu.jo/index.php/zjjb/Ethics snapshot 637327ac66028c90a291ac63ef7f3a62b9ac30b6065f10312a6a6bfdae1edcc3
33+Tracker checked at: 2026-06-12T12:39:00.000Z

声明变更

4 声明 条记录

research

The ZUJ Journal of Legal Studies AI-tool policy permits AI use only for language editing, proofreading, grammar or spelling correction, rephrasing without changing meaning, and summarizing researcher-written text; it prohibits using AI to generate scientific content, manipulate data or figures, invent references, write conclusions or analysis, or submit unverified AI-generated content.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据1语言en

research

The ZUJ Journal of Legal Studies AI-tool policy sets an AI-generated-content limit of 35%, a similarity-index limit of 30%, requires authors to disclose AI use and assume responsibility for AI errors or plagiarism, and says the journal uses Turnitin AI Detector with possible sanctions including rejection, author bans, notifying the author's institution, or retraction.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%证据1语言en

research

The Al-Zaytoonah University Journal of Business ethics page requires authors to disclose AI-tool use in manuscript preparation and says AI-generated content should be reviewed and verified by the authors.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言en

source_status

The official Students' guidebook 2025/2026 provides general student and thesis academic-integrity context, including plagiarism checks and discipline rules, but this crawl did not locate an AI-specific student academic-integrity rule in the guidebook text.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度82%证据1语言en

源快照

3 source attributions