Amman, Jordan

Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources3Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/al-zaytoonah-university-of-jordan.json

Policy profile

Coverage score45/100Coverage labelpartial public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence76%

Coursework

No source-backed public claim about coursework AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about coursework, assignments, or syllabus-level AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Exams

No source-backed public claim about exam AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about exams, tests, quizzes, or examination conditions.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Research

The ZUJ Journal of Legal Studies AI-tool policy permits AI use only for language editing, proofreading, grammar or spelling correction, rephrasing without changing meaning, and summarizing researcher-written text; it prohibits using AI to generate scientific content, manipulate data or figures, invent references, write conclusions or analysis, or submit unverified AI-generated content.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: journal_legal_studies_ai_limited_language_support_prohibits_content_data_references_conclusions_unverified_content

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Permitted Uses of AI Tools AI may be used only for: Language editing and proofreading; Correcting grammatical or spelling errors; Rephrasing text without altering meaning; Summarizing texts written by the researcher. Prohibited Uses AI must not be used for: Generating scientific content in whole or in part; Creating or manipulating data or figures; Inventing references; Writing conclusions or conducting analysis; Submitting AI-generated content without scientific verification.

Research

The ZUJ Journal of Legal Studies AI-tool policy sets an AI-generated-content limit of 35%, a similarity-index limit of 30%, requires authors to disclose AI use and assume responsibility for AI errors or plagiarism, and says the journal uses Turnitin AI Detector with possible sanctions including rejection, author bans, notifying the author's institution, or retraction.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: journal_legal_studies_ai_content_limit_similarity_limit_disclosure_turnitin_sanctions

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI-generated content must not exceed 35%. Similarity Index must not exceed 30%. Editors may reject any manuscript suspected of containing AI-generated material. Authors must: Confirm originality of ideas and results; Review AI-edited content; Disclose AI usage; Assume responsibility for plagiarism or AI errors. Verification Tools The journal uses AI-detection and plagiarism tools, including: Turnitin AI Detector. Violation Penalty Possible sanctions include: Rejection without review; Author ban; Notifying the author's institution; Retraction of published papers.

Research

The Al-Zaytoonah University Journal of Business ethics page requires authors to disclose AI-tool use in manuscript preparation and says AI-generated content should be reviewed and verified by the authors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: business_journal_authors_disclose_ai_tools_review_verify_ai_generated_content

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Use of Artificial Intelligence Authors must disclose the use of AI tools in the preparation of manuscripts. AI-generated content must be properly reviewed and verified by the authors.

Source Status

The official Students' guidebook 2025/2026 provides general student and thesis academic-integrity context, including plagiarism checks and discipline rules, but this crawl did not locate an AI-specific student academic-integrity rule in the guidebook text.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: student_guidebook_general_integrity_context_no_ai_specific_student_rule_found_in_guidebook_text

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Checking for plagiarism in master's theses before and after the defense is the responsibility of the Deanship of Graduate Studies ... ensuring that the plagiarism percentage does not exceed the allowed limit of 30%. Subject to Article (42) ... cases of plagiarism or doubt thereof shall be referred to the Theses Ethics committee.

Localized display only

The guidebook has general plagiarism and thesis-ethics rules. Full-text checks for AI-specific terms did not locate an AI-specific student academic-integrity rule in this PDF.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedJun 12, 2026Last changedJun 12, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities