Venice, Italy

Ca' Foscari University of Venice

本站使用指南

获导师同意,记录论文AI使用。

Bachelor/Master论文须同意、声明、核验;教学例子、Compilatio检查及旧科研指导不当完整纪律或工具许可。

本站解读;官方证据保留原文。

尚无完整的学生政策摘要;可先查看已收录条款及来源。

适用范围与过渡细节

Bachelor/Master论文须同意、声明、核验;教学例子、Compilatio检查及旧科研指导不当完整纪律或工具许可。

Agree with the supervisor and document thesis AI use. hero illustration; exact scope and conditions are in the adjacent source-linked text.
请核对所在学院及具体作业的规定。

AI 使用引发疑虑后,会发生什么?

补充资料采集: 2026-10-08 · 现行适用性未独立确认

对比已发布的大学记录 ↗

哪些行为会引发疑虑

AI 明示条款官方指导规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

教学指导要求每活动明确准/禁用;语言辅助与brainstorming是预期用AI时的建议说明,不当每项评估许可。未经核验/重作直接复制粘贴列不准。

适用范围: Teachers/students within the specific activity instructions · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

检测证据 · 支持与合理调整

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

Teaching guidance asks teachers to specify permitted and forbidden uses for each activity; its language-assistance and brainstorming examples are suggested notes where AI is anticipated, not permission for every assessment. Copy-paste without verification/reworking is listed as not permitted.

适用范围: Teachers/students within the specific activity instructions · university

thinking. This approach can better assess the actual knowledge and skills related to the subject matter. Such verification is an essential part of the exam and must be carried out in accordance with the Student Careers Regulations regarding the validation of exam grades. Students may have unrealistic expectations regarding the capabilities and outcomes of AI. Therefore, teachers should offer clear guidance on how to properly use these tools during tests and activities, explicitly stating what is permitted and what is not allowed in each situation. Where AIs are anticipated to assist in testing, for example, it is advisable to clarify the rules regarding permitted and non-permitted uses by including notes like those below: 5/12 • Permitted: use AI tools as language assistants to enhance your texts (e.g., check syntax and terminology). In this case, AI does not add new content. • Permitted: using AI tools as a search engine or for brainstorming, but users should not use the output directly. Instead, they should verify the information through alternate reliable sources and critically assess the results. • NOT permitted: Copy and paste of AI-generated content without proper source verification and re-elaboration.
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 185–208
SHA-256: 6b1ea4bd62ef423bdcd826b177890eaa69d5bb7f3489996fa0f0601f8d0170c5

如何回应与说明

AI 明示条款官方指导规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

Bachelor/Master终稿AI须导师同意、声明、可验证;引言方法声明工具、阶段、目的及核验,AI图注明软件并核版权。外部工具不得个人/敏感/保密输入,强烈建议学校工具但不证明某命名许可。

适用范围: Bachelor/Master thesis and final paper preparation · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

检测证据 · 支持与合理调整

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

For Bachelor/Master final papers, AI use must be agreed with the supervisor, declared and verifiable. An introductory methodological declaration identifies tools, stages, purposes and verification; AI images require software attribution and copyright checks. External tools must not receive personal/sensitive/confidential information. Institutional tools are strongly advised, not a named licence promise.

适用范围: Bachelor/Master graduating students and thesis supervisors · university

During the preparation of your thesis/final paper, it is essential to pay particular attention to the correct use of sources and to the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence tools. You are therefore invited to consult the Guidelines for thesis/final paper provided by the University, which contain useful instructions on how to prepare your work, use sources appropriately and follow good academic practices. Please also note that uploading your thesis/final paper in your Personal area is mandatory, as your work will be checked using the Compilatio software, adopted by the University to verify the proper use of sources and ensure the authenticity of submitted work. You are also required to include in your thesis/final paper a declaration clearly stating: whether you used Artificial Intelligence tools during the preparation of your work; if so, how and in which context they were used. This declaration is intended to ensure transparency and academic integrity in the preparation of your final work. Guidelines for thesis/final paper [ITA] How to create the file of your thesis/final paper and upload it on your Personal Area: Use of AI Upload thesis/final paper Anti-plagiarism software Format of thesis/final paper Copyright Use of AI How to use AI tools in the preparation of your thesis/final paper The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, including generative models (e.g. ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Claude, etc.), is permitted in the preparation of your final paper or thesis, provided that it complies with the principles of academic responsibility, originality, and scientific rigour. As indicated in the Guidelines for thesis/final paper, such use must be aware, declared, verifiable, and must be agreed upon with your supervisor. For this reason, you will be required to include, in an introductory methodological section of your final paper or thesis, a declaration stating: which AI tools were used; at which stages of the work they were employed; for what purposes (e.g. writing support, language editing, data analysis or data presentation); that you have verified the accuracy and reliability of the content produced. To prepare this declaration, use the downloadable template provided below. AI tools may provide useful support in improving clarity, structure, and conciseness; however, the work must remain personal and original. You remain fully responsible for all content produced, including content generated with AI: you must ensure its accuracy, avoid misleading information, and comply with citation and plagiarism regulations. If AI-generated images or other content are used, you must indicate the software used, verify their relevance and accuracy, and ensure compliance with copyright regulations. Finally, you are strongly advised to use University-provided tools in order to ensure appropriate data protection. When using external tools, you must not enter personal data or sensitive or confidential information, as such data may be processed or retained by service providers.
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 44–69
SHA-256: ffa5936e45bec1951a417c621300aa8adb9a6208cf7fa89c4d7abc142cdff7f2

AI 明示条款官方指导规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

研究指南要求核验AI输出、作者负责科研/发表诚信;页脚2024年11月,AI门户却公布研究指导2026年3月16日Decree214修改、3月23日生效。分别保留旧英文正文与门户更新,不认证全文已协调新版。

适用范围: Researchers using the captured English guideline · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

检测证据 · 支持与合理调整

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

The captured research guideline requires verification of AI outputs and keeps authors responsible for research/publication integrity. Its footer says November2024, while the AI portal announces research-guideline modification by Decree214 of March16,2026, effective March23. The dated English document and portal update are retained without claiming the linked English text is a fully reconciled current version.

适用范围: Researchers using the captured English guideline · university

Use of Generative AI in Research: ●​ The results generated by AI tools must always be verified through various control steps. Generative AI systems do not guarantee accuracy and lack mechanisms to ensure the truthfulness of their claims. They may produce what is known as "bias" – grammatically correct content that appears plausible at first glance but contains false information. It is essential to seek out original sources and properly attribute them to their creators. As AI tools operate more "autonomously," the associated risks increase. Consequently, as the potential for damage grows, the level of verification required by researchers must also intensify. ●​ Individuals using AI are fully responsible for the outcomes and the appropriateness of the research processes involving AI. Responsibility cannot be transferred to AI tools, and it is essential to stay informed about how these tools are used. This means that everyone employing these systems for their research is accountable for any misuse, such as failing to adhere to the principles of scientific integrity on issues such as plagiarism and proper citation of sources. This principle aligns with the Committee of Publication Ethics (COPE) stance, which asserts that authors are entirely responsible for the content of their work, Computer Services and Telecommunication Area (ASIT) Working Group for ICT Research Support Activities, November 2024 4 Ca’ Foscari University of Venice Dorsoduro 3246, 30123 Venice, Italy www.unive.it including any sections generated by AI tools. Therefore, they can be held accountable for any violations of publication ethics. Additionally, ALLEA's 2023 European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity mandates that the use of AI tools be reported in accordance with the standards relevant to the specific
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 151–182
SHA-256: 52da288957b2cf88a5ba4640dc292a984f94995dc283da544a7a34e269219696

Guidelines for the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in Research by the "Working Group for ICT Research Support Activities”, coordinated by Prof. Marco S. Nobile and advised by Chiara Gallese, Marie Curie Fellow at the University of Turin and member of the EU’s AI Office Working Group on “General-Purpose AI Code of Practice”. Guidelines modified by the Rectoral Decree No. 214 of 16/03/2026, and entered into force on 23/03/2026.439 K Guidelines for the Responsible Use of Generative AI in Teaching and Learning by the Working Table on the use of AI for Teaching, coordinated by Prof. Sabina Rossi and Dr. Teresa Scantamburlo, Ca' Foscari's representative in the Working Group on the “General-Purpose AI Code of Practice” of the AI Office of the European Community317 K
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 50–53
SHA-256: bf624775dc75e44bd84abb3717908393c43034a30bf89e7f2b7890ecf4e28e1c

支持与合理调整 · 检测证据

AI 明示条款官方指导规范语气: 信息性检测证据

本站解读

论文须个人区上传供Compilatio来源/真实性检查,并声明AI是否使用及方式;未规定检测分数即证明,也未给纪律申诉期。

适用范围: Bachelor/Master thesis upload · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

The thesis must be uploaded in the Personal Area for Compilatio source/authenticity checking. It also requires a declaration whether AI was used and how. The page does not establish a detector score as proof or give a disciplinary appeal deadline.

适用范围: Graduating Bachelor/Master students · university

During the preparation of your thesis/final paper, it is essential to pay particular attention to the correct use of sources and to the responsible use of Artificial Intelligence tools. You are therefore invited to consult the Guidelines for thesis/final paper provided by the University, which contain useful instructions on how to prepare your work, use sources appropriately and follow good academic practices. Please also note that uploading your thesis/final paper in your Personal area is mandatory, as your work will be checked using the Compilatio software, adopted by the University to verify the proper use of sources and ensure the authenticity of submitted work. You are also required to include in your thesis/final paper a declaration clearly stating: whether you used Artificial Intelligence tools during the preparation of your work; if so, how and in which context they were used. This declaration is intended to ensure transparency and academic integrity in the preparation of your final work.
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 44–50
SHA-256: ffa5936e45bec1951a417c621300aa8adb9a6208cf7fa89c4d7abc142cdff7f2

AI 明示条款官方指导规范语气: 信息性检测证据

本站解读

教学指导建议记录交互以透明,并称因误报不可仅凭AI检测评价学生;建议记录不是学生全校强制交完整日志,也不取消来源核验或论文上传要求。

适用范围: Teachers evaluating learning and considering AI detection · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

The teaching guidance suggests documenting interactions for transparency and says it is unwise to assess students solely with AI detectors because of false positives. Suggested recording is not a universal student full-log obligation, and the detector caution does not abolish source verification or the thesis upload requirement.

适用范围: Teachers evaluating learning and considering AI detection · university

Transparency AI tools are ‘black boxes’: it is not possible to know or analyse the processes that lead to a given output. Therefore, promoting transparency through a critical and mindful approach is essential. To achieve this, teachers could track interactions with the tool. For instance, it would be helpful to document the name of the tool used, the prompts entered along with their corresponding outputs, any prompt engineering techniques applied, the purpose of using the tool, and the strengths and limitations encountered during its use. These measures not only enhance transparency but also help build trust between teachers and learners. AI detector There are currently no software tools that can accurately determine if a text was generated by an AI. Therefore, it is unwise to evaluate students solely based on AI detection software, as recent studies show a significant number of false positives.5 For this reason, it is crucial for teachers to evaluate students' work based on their individual experiences, skills, and knowledge of the subject. Just like with plagiarism
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 211–227
SHA-256: 6b1ea4bd62ef423bdcd826b177890eaa69d5bb7f3489996fa0f0601f8d0170c5

采集与版本说明

已发布的来源补充。英文摘要与原语言引文和已审核记录分开展示。这里列出可能的程序与结果,不是使用 AI 的自动处罚;现行适用性尚未独立确认,请核对来源的适用范围和版本。

按所存原文核对;不是官方译文

哈希仅用于核对所存内容,不证明现行有效性或不可篡改。这些主题不表示每个学生都会经历的流程。

AI 工具与获取方式

能获取工具不等于获准在作业中使用。请同时核对任务规则、适用人员和数据限制。

尚未建立这所大学的可靠工具记录。这不代表工具不存在,也不代表禁止使用 AI。

Reviewed record

已审核条款

4 条已审核条款

教学1 条已审核条款

教学

Ca' Foscari's teaching and learning AI guidelines address faculty and students and frame generative AI as a responsible, constructive aid rather than a replacement for intellectual work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: teaching_learning_guidance_for_faculty_students

原始证据

证据 1
These guidelines regarding the potential use of AI tools in teaching and learning are intended for faculty and students. They apply to all forms of AI, regardless of the type of input and output, with a particular focus on commercial applications.

本地化显示 only

The teaching and learning guidance is explicitly addressed to faculty and students and applies broadly to AI tools, with focus on commercial applications.

隐私1 条已审核条款

隐私

Ca' Foscari's administrative AI guidelines tell technical administrative staff not to input personal data, contract data, or protected copyright or confidentiality-restricted data into AI tools unless the relevant permission exists.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: admin_ai_guidance_no_personal_or_confidential_data_inputs

原始证据

证据 1
The staff should therefore not input the following data into AI tools: Personal data that could directly or indirectly identify individuals. Data that is important for future research use and might be protected by intellectual property law. Data subject to contracts with third parties, such as companies. Data protected by copyright or confidentiality restrictions, unless permission is obtained from the owner.

本地化显示 only

Administrative staff guidance says not to enter personal, contract, protected intellectual-property, or confidentiality-restricted data into AI tools unless permission applies.

研究1 条已审核条款

研究

Ca' Foscari's research AI guidelines support responsible use of AI in research and advise researchers to be transparent about AI tool use, including tools, versions, and prompts where relevant.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: research_ai_responsible_use_transparency_citation

原始证据

证据 1
Researchers should ensure maximum transparency regarding their use of AI tools in scientific activities. This means that the way AI tools are used should be described in detail in ad hoc sections of the article (e.g., 'Materials and methods' and/or 'Further information'), specifying the prompts (where relevant), which tools were used and which version.

本地化显示 only

The research guidance advises transparent disclosure of AI tool use, including prompts where relevant, tools used, and versions.

来源状态1 条已审核条款

Source Status

Ca' Foscari University of Venice maintains an official AI guidance hub linking guidelines for research, teaching and learning, and administrative services.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: official_ai_guidance_hub_with_linked_guidelines

原始证据

证据 1
The Rector's Delegates for Digital innovation in teaching and research, supported by the staff of the Computer Services and Telecommunications Area (ASIT), have prepared the following guidelines: Guidelines for the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in Research; Guidelines for the Responsible Use of Generative AI in Teaching and Learning.

本地化显示 only

The official AI hub links Ca' Foscari's research and teaching/learning AI guideline PDFs and separately lists administrative-services AI guidance.

Source record

官方来源

4 个来源

展开官方来源列表
记录信息、JSON 与引用
审核AI 辅助审核置信度96%快照状态未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Ca' Foscari University of Venice AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 18, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/ca-foscari-university-of-venice

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志

Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.