University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Brighton, United Kingdom

University of Brighton

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: 801-850Updated2026年7月19日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

7 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Brighton in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"University of Brighton provides or institutionally supports Microsoft Copilot.","howToObtain":"Use University of Brighton credentials.","costToUser":"No individual price is stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

最后检查时间
2026年7月19日
最后更改时间
2026年7月19日

原始证据

证据 1
Under our University of Brighton institutional license, we have the version of Copilot which refers to the AI chatbot. This is accessible to staff and students using their university logins.

本地化显示 only

Under our University of Brighton institutional license, we have the version of Copilot which refers to the AI chatbot. This is accessible to staff and students using their university logins.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
710f7f27…
已检索
2026年7月19日

Academic Integrity

University of Brighton PGR admissions guidance requires applicants who use AI to acknowledge how GenAI was used, and says applications may be withdrawn or studies terminated where false information or substantial GenAI fabrication is found.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: PGR applicants using AI must acknowledge use; false or substantially generated applications can have consequences.

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
Applicants who use AI to develop or support their application must include a short statement acknowledging how Gen AI has been used. If it is suspected that an application is supported by false information or is substantially generated using Gen AI tools, we will withdraw the application.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
deef1c18…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Application requirements

Academic Integrity

University of Brighton PGR admissions guidance says applicants may use GenAI to support applications, such as brainstorming or proofreading, but must not use GenAI to generate large amounts of content or write a personal statement or research proposal.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: PGR applicants may use GenAI support, but not for substantial generated application content.

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
You can use Gen AI tools (eg Chat GTP, Gemini) to support your application but you must not use Gen AI to generate large amounts of content. This means you may, for example, use AI to help you brainstorm ideas or proofread your writing but you must not ask AI to write your personal statement or research proposal.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
deef1c18…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Acceptable use of AI

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Brighton student guidance says information generated by GenAI requires fact-checking, should not be relied on alone, and should be verified via more reliable sources.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: GenAI outputs require fact-checking and independent verification.

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
Assume any information generated by GenAI requires fact-checking. Do not rely solely on the output without doing your own independent research. Verify the information via other more reliable sources.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
22f579a0…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Can we trust Generative AI outputs?

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Brighton guidance says the university has an institutional license for Microsoft Copilot chatbot, while noting that outputs still need to be verified and fact checked.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%

标准化值: Institutional Microsoft Copilot license with verification reminder.

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
The University of Brighton has an institutional license for Microsoft Copilot chatbot, which: Provides answers with citations to sources for extra transparency. Outputs still need to be verified and fact checked.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
22f579a0…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Can we trust Generative AI outputs?

Academic Integrity

University of Brighton student guidance tells students to check whether GenAI is allowed before using it for an assignment.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度84%

标准化值: Students are reminded to check assignment-level GenAI permission.

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
Before using GenAI for an assignment, remember to check whether it is allowed, here is some guidance on using GenAI in assignments.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
22f579a0…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Can we trust Generative AI outputs?

教学

University of Brighton GenAI ethics guidance frames ethical considerations as a starting point for students to see AI in context, think critically, and make informed decisions about how and when to use it.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度82%

标准化值: Students are guided to consider GenAI ethics critically and contextually.

最后检查时间
2026年5月20日
最后更改时间
2026年5月20日

原始证据

证据 1
This information is not meant to discourage you from using AI. It is meant to provide a starting point to see AI in context, think critically and make informed decisions about how and when to use it.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
aba3bb01…
已检索
2026年5月20日
证据定位器
Ethics and Artificial intelligence

Source record

官方来源

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Brighton AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-brighton

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志