University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Brighton, United Kingdom

University of Brighton

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: 801-850UpdatedJul 19, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

7 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Brighton in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"University of Brighton provides or institutionally supports Microsoft Copilot.","howToObtain":"Use University of Brighton credentials.","costToUser":"No individual price is stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Last checked
Jul 19, 2026
Last changed
Jul 19, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Under our University of Brighton institutional license, we have the version of Copilot which refers to the AI chatbot. This is accessible to staff and students using their university logins.

Localized display only

Under our University of Brighton institutional license, we have the version of Copilot which refers to the AI chatbot. This is accessible to staff and students using their university logins.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
710f7f27…
Retrieved
Jul 19, 2026

Academic Integrity

University of Brighton PGR admissions guidance requires applicants who use AI to acknowledge how GenAI was used, and says applications may be withdrawn or studies terminated where false information or substantial GenAI fabrication is found.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: PGR applicants using AI must acknowledge use; false or substantially generated applications can have consequences.

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Applicants who use AI to develop or support their application must include a short statement acknowledging how Gen AI has been used. If it is suspected that an application is supported by false information or is substantially generated using Gen AI tools, we will withdraw the application.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
deef1c18…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Application requirements

Academic Integrity

University of Brighton PGR admissions guidance says applicants may use GenAI to support applications, such as brainstorming or proofreading, but must not use GenAI to generate large amounts of content or write a personal statement or research proposal.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: PGR applicants may use GenAI support, but not for substantial generated application content.

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
You can use Gen AI tools (eg Chat GTP, Gemini) to support your application but you must not use Gen AI to generate large amounts of content. This means you may, for example, use AI to help you brainstorm ideas or proofread your writing but you must not ask AI to write your personal statement or research proposal.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
deef1c18…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Acceptable use of AI

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Brighton student guidance says information generated by GenAI requires fact-checking, should not be relied on alone, and should be verified via more reliable sources.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: GenAI outputs require fact-checking and independent verification.

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Assume any information generated by GenAI requires fact-checking. Do not rely solely on the output without doing your own independent research. Verify the information via other more reliable sources.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
22f579a0…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Can we trust Generative AI outputs?

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Brighton guidance says the university has an institutional license for Microsoft Copilot chatbot, while noting that outputs still need to be verified and fact checked.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: Institutional Microsoft Copilot license with verification reminder.

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The University of Brighton has an institutional license for Microsoft Copilot chatbot, which: Provides answers with citations to sources for extra transparency. Outputs still need to be verified and fact checked.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
22f579a0…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Can we trust Generative AI outputs?

Academic Integrity

University of Brighton student guidance tells students to check whether GenAI is allowed before using it for an assignment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: Students are reminded to check assignment-level GenAI permission.

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Before using GenAI for an assignment, remember to check whether it is allowed, here is some guidance on using GenAI in assignments.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
22f579a0…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Can we trust Generative AI outputs?

Teaching

University of Brighton GenAI ethics guidance frames ethical considerations as a starting point for students to see AI in context, think critically, and make informed decisions about how and when to use it.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: Students are guided to consider GenAI ethics critically and contextually.

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
This information is not meant to discourage you from using AI. It is meant to provide a starting point to see AI in context, think critically and make informed decisions about how and when to use it.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
aba3bb01…
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Ethics and Artificial intelligence

Source record

Official sources

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Brighton AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-brighton

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log