University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

APIGitHub

Change log

University of Brighton

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Claims6Sources3
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Brighton currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

University of Brighton current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+12-0
11 # University of Brighton AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: University of Brighton PGR admissions guidance requires applicants who use AI to acknowledge how GenAI was used, and says applications may be withdrawn or studies terminated where false information or substantial GenAI fabrication is found.
3+Evidence (en, deef1c18af39): Applicants who use AI to develop or support their application must include a short statement acknowledging how Gen AI has been used. If it is suspected that an application is supported by false information or is substantially generated using Gen AI tools, we will withdraw the application.
4+academic_integrity: University of Brighton PGR admissions guidance says applicants may use GenAI to support applications, such as brainstorming or proofreading, but must not use GenAI to generate large amounts of content or write a personal statement or research proposal.
5+Evidence (en, deef1c18af39): You can use Gen AI tools (eg Chat GTP, Gemini) to support your application but you must not use Gen AI to generate large amounts of content. This means you may, for example, use AI to help you brainstorm ideas or proofread your writing but you must not ask AI to write your personal statement or research proposal.
6+ai_tool_treatment: University of Brighton student guidance says information generated by GenAI requires fact-checking, should not be relied on alone, and should be verified via more reliable sources.
7+Evidence (en, 22f579a08424): Assume any information generated by GenAI requires fact-checking. Do not rely solely on the output without doing your own independent research. Verify the information via other more reliable sources.
8+ai_tool_treatment: University of Brighton guidance says the university has an institutional license for Microsoft Copilot chatbot, while noting that outputs still need to be verified and fact checked.
9+Evidence (en, 22f579a08424): The University of Brighton has an institutional license for Microsoft Copilot chatbot, which: Provides answers with citations to sources for extra transparency. Outputs still need to be verified and fact checked.
10+academic_integrity: University of Brighton student guidance tells students to check whether GenAI is allowed before using it for an assignment.
11+Evidence (en, 22f579a08424): Before using GenAI for an assignment, remember to check whether it is allowed, here is some guidance on using GenAI in assignments.
12+teaching: University of Brighton GenAI ethics guidance frames ethical considerations as a starting point for students to see AI in context, think critically, and make informed decisions about how and when to use it.
13+Evidence (en, aba3bb01f35e): This information is not meant to discourage you from using AI. It is meant to provide a starting point to see AI in context, think critically and make informed decisions about how and when to use it.

Claim changes

6 claim records

academic_integrity

University of Brighton PGR admissions guidance requires applicants who use AI to acknowledge how GenAI was used, and says applications may be withdrawn or studies terminated where false information or substantial GenAI fabrication is found.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Brighton PGR admissions guidance says applicants may use GenAI to support applications, such as brainstorming or proofreading, but must not use GenAI to generate large amounts of content or write a personal statement or research proposal.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Brighton student guidance says information generated by GenAI requires fact-checking, should not be relied on alone, and should be verified via more reliable sources.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Brighton guidance says the university has an institutional license for Microsoft Copilot chatbot, while noting that outputs still need to be verified and fact checked.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Brighton student guidance tells students to check whether GenAI is allowed before using it for an assignment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

University of Brighton GenAI ethics guidance frames ethical considerations as a starting point for students to see AI in context, think critically, and make informed decisions about how and when to use it.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

3 source attributions