Edinburgh, United Kingdom

The University of Edinburgh

The University of Edinburgh is listed as QS 2026 rank 34. The University of Edinburgh has 8 source-backed AI policy claim records from 6 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready overview

v1 public contract

The University of Edinburgh is listed as QS 2026 rank 34. The University of Edinburgh has 8 source-backed AI policy claim records from 6 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Reviewed claims8Candidate claims0Official sources6

Candidate claims are source-backed records pending review. They are not final policy conclusions and are not legal or academic integrity advice.

Reviewed claims

8 reviewed public claim

Academic Integrity

At the University of Edinburgh, presenting AI outputs as your own original work, submitting AI-generated text without acknowledgment, and using AI agents within university learning platforms constitute academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence98%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The following uses of generative and agentic AI are not acceptable and constitute misconduct: 1. Presenting AI outputs as your own, original work. 2. Using an AI translator to convert assessed work to English before submission. 3. Submitting an assessment which includes elements of AI-generated text without acknowledgment. 4. Submitting AI-generated images, audio or video without acknowledgment. 5. Submitting AI-generated mathematical formulae or reasoning, or computer code, without acknowledgment. 6. Citing AI-found sources without reading and verifying them. 7. Using an AI agent or AI browser to complete work within your virtual learning environment.

Ai Tool Treatment

The University of Edinburgh does not ban the use of generative AI by students, though its use is restricted for much assessed work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The University does not ban the use of AI, though its use will be restricted for much of your assessed work.

Ai Tool Treatment

ELM (Edinburgh access to Language Models) is the University of Edinburgh's AI innovation platform and a central gateway providing safer access to generative AI through large language models.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
ELM is the University of Edinburgh's AI innovation platform, a central gateway providing safer access to Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) via access to Large Language Models (LLMs).

Academic Integrity

At the University of Edinburgh, staff presenting AI-generated content as their own original work, uploading personal data or confidential information to external AI tools, and relying on AI detection tools are listed as unacceptable uses.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Unacceptable uses (for staff): Presenting AI generated content as your own original work. Uploading personal data or confidential information to external AI tools. Using ELM with identifiable patient/clinical data. Publishing AI assisted content without appropriate attribution. Relying on AI for decisions where legal/ethical duties require human judgement. Ignoring funder, publisher or regulator rules on AI use. Do not rely on AI detection tools to confirm authorship. They misclassify human and AI content.

Privacy

The University of Edinburgh states that ELM chat histories are private to the individual user and are not accessible to lecturers for checking student work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Please note, your lecturers do not have access to your chat history in ELM for the purposes of 'checking' your work - like your email account, it is private to you.

Academic Integrity

The University of Edinburgh advises staff not to rely on AI detection tools to confirm authorship, as they misclassify human and AI content.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Do not rely on AI detection tools to confirm authorship. They misclassify human and AI content.

Research

The University of Edinburgh does not ban the use of generative AI in postgraduate research, though its use is restricted for work assessed by the University and students must discuss AI use with supervisors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The University does not ban the use of generative AI in your research, though its use is restricted for work assessed by the University.

Ai Tool Treatment

The University of Edinburgh says users can access the Copilot chat service within Edge by signing in with University credentials, where a green shield indicates additional protections.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Currently, you can access the CoPilot chat service within Edge by signing in with your University credentials. A green shield will appear, giving you additional protections.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

6 source attribution

Guidance for students and staff on AI use

ed.ac.uk

Snapshot hash
cdd5f419599a526ecde8e9658e02c6e96ae64f441317b56f29a2ef7baa1df180
Back to universities