Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
The University of Edinburgh has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
The University of Edinburgh has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
The University of Edinburgh has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
The University of Edinburgh has 4 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
The University of Edinburgh has 5 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
The University of Edinburgh has 4 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
The University of Edinburgh has 5 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
The University of Edinburgh has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
The University of Edinburgh
12 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1The following uses of generative and agentic AI are not acceptable and constitute misconduct: 1. Presenting AI outputs as your own, original work. 2. Using an AI translator to convert assessed work to English before submission. 3. Submitting an assessment which includes elements of AI-generated text without acknowledgment. 4. Submitting AI-generated images, audio or video without acknowledgment. 5. Submitting AI-generated mathematical formulae or reasoning, or computer code, without acknowledgment. 6. Citing AI-found sources without reading and verifying them. 7. Using an AI agent or AI browser to complete work within your virtual learning environment.
Ai Tool Treatment
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University does not ban the use of AI, though its use will be restricted for much of your assessed work.
Ai Tool Treatment
Original evidence
Evidence 1ELM is the University of Edinburgh's AI innovation platform, a central gateway providing safer access to Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) via access to Large Language Models (LLMs).
Academic Integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Unacceptable uses (for staff): Presenting AI generated content as your own original work. Uploading personal data or confidential information to external AI tools. Using ELM with identifiable patient/clinical data. Publishing AI assisted content without appropriate attribution. Relying on AI for decisions where legal/ethical duties require human judgement. Ignoring funder, publisher or regulator rules on AI use. Do not rely on AI detection tools to confirm authorship. They misclassify human and AI content.
Privacy
Original evidence
Evidence 1Please note, your lecturers do not have access to your chat history in ELM for the purposes of 'checking' your work - like your email account, it is private to you.
Academic Integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Do not rely on AI detection tools to confirm authorship. They misclassify human and AI content.
Research
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University does not ban the use of generative AI in your research, though its use is restricted for work assessed by the University.
Ai Tool Treatment
Original evidence
Evidence 1Currently, you can access the CoPilot chat service within Edge by signing in with your University credentials. A green shield will appear, giving you additional protections.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: The University of Edinburgh prohibits students from using AI agents or AI browsers to complete work inside virtual learning environments.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Using an AI agent or AI browser to complete any type of work – assessed or not – within your virtual learning environment.
Privacy
Normalized value: The University of Edinburgh says using an AI agent within Learn or any university learning or assessment platform requiring login is not permitted.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Using an AI agent within Learn or any other University learning or assessment platform which requires you to log in is not permitted.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: The University of Edinburgh says students must not use third-party AI-based translation apps in class.
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI-based translation apps retain and process recordings in a way that is not allowed in this policy... As a result, you must not use third-party AI-based translation apps in class.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: The University of Edinburgh encourages students to use ELM over external AI platforms because it provides privacy protections and institutional access.
Original evidence
Evidence 1The university encourages you to use ELM over other platforms such as GPT, DeepSeek, Grok etc... In ELM your data is secure – it will not be retained by third party services to train their models.
0 machine or needs-review claim
7 source attribution
information-services.ed.ac.uk
information-services.ed.ac.uk
information-services.ed.ac.uk
ed.ac.uk
information-services.ed.ac.uk
information-services.ed.ac.uk
information-services.ed.ac.uk