Aarhus, Denmark

Aarhus University

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

10 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

Aarhus University student guidance says students who use GAI in an exam project must submit a declaration naming the applications and explaining how they were used, and unchanged GAI output used in an exam project must be cited like other secondary-source quotations.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: gai_exam_project_declaration_and_unchanged_output_citation_required

原始证据

证据 1
If you use part of a text or another output generated by a GAI application in your exam project without changing it, you must cite it in the same way you cite quotations from other secondary sources. If you use GAI in your exam project, you must submit a declaration that contains the following: 1) confirmation you used GAI, 2) the name of the GAI applications you used (ChatGPT, Copilot, Bing etc. and 3) an explanation of how you used the applications in your paper.

本地化显示 only

Students must cite unchanged GAI output used in an exam project and submit a declaration confirming GAI use, naming the applications, and explaining their use.

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot Basic is listed for Aarhus University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot Basic","description":"Aarhus University basic Microsoft Copilot access.","howToObtain":"Use the basic version available to AU students and employees.","costToUser":"Equivalent to the free ChatGPT version.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"not_specified"}

原始证据

证据 1
Aarhus University IT says all students and employees have access to the basic version of Microsoft Copilot, equivalent to the free version of ChatGPT.

本地化显示 only

Aarhus University IT says all students and employees have access to the basic version of Microsoft Copilot, equivalent to the free version of ChatGPT.

Ai Tool Treatment

Aarhus University student guidance says the main rule is that students are allowed to use GAI unless their academic regulations or the course catalogue explicitly state that GAI is not allowed.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: student_gai_allowed_unless_academic_regulations_or_course_catalogue_disallow

原始证据

证据 1
The main rule is that you are allowed to use GAI if your academic regulations or the course catalogue doesn’t explicitly state that using GAI is not allowed.

本地化显示 only

AU student guidance states that GAI is allowed by default unless academic regulations or the course catalogue explicitly disallow it.

隐私

Aarhus University student guidance says students should never upload confidential or sensitive personal data covered by GDPR rules to a GAI application.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: students_never_upload_confidential_sensitive_gdpr_data_to_gai

原始证据

证据 1
Never upload confidential or sensitive personal data (in other words, data covered by the GDPR rules) to a GAI application: you can’t be sure what will happen to the texts you upload. Make sure you understand the data protection rules, and follow them.

本地化显示 only

AU student guidance tells students never to upload confidential or sensitive personal data covered by GDPR to GAI applications.

隐私

Aarhus University staff guidance says staff may not use GAI for trade secrets, confidential or sensitive data or copyrighted material; staff are responsible for the accuracy and quality of GAI-generated content they use or share; and GAI use should be credited where relevant.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: staff_no_confidential_sensitive_copyrighted_material_verify_quality_credit_gai

原始证据

证据 1
This means that you may not use GAI for anything involving trade secrets, confidential or sensitive data or copyrighted material. When you use GAI to generate a text or an image, you are responsible for ensuring the accuracy and quality of the content. Generally speaking, you should always consider whether crediting your use of GAI is relevant when you use GAI to generate a text, an image, a video or another product.

本地化显示 only

AU staff guidance bars GAI use with trade secrets, confidential/sensitive data, or copyrighted material, and requires users to verify quality and consider crediting GAI use.

Academic Integrity

Aarhus University student guidance says that when GAI is not allowed for an exam, students are not allowed to use GAI for proofreading or feedback on the exam text, and for internet-allowed exams where GAI is not allowed students may do regular web searches but may not actively use AI functions.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: when_gai_disallowed_no_gai_proofreading_feedback_or_active_ai_functions

原始证据

证据 1
If you’re not allowed to use GAI for the exam in question, you are not allowed to use GAI to proofread and give you feedback on your exam text. Exams where the internet is allowed, but AI is not allowed, you are allowed to do regular web searches, but you are not allowed to actively use AI functions.

本地化显示 only

When GAI is disallowed for an exam, AU bars GAI proofreading/feedback on exam text and active use of AI functions even if regular internet search is allowed.

教学

AU Educate guidance for teaching staff says that from fall 2024 students are allowed to use GAI in all AU exams unless academic regulations or the course description explicitly state that they may not, and it advises teachers to read those rules for their courses.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: teaching_staff_guidance_fall_2024_gai_allowed_unless_rules_disallow

原始证据

证据 1
From the fall of 2024, students are allowed to use generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in all exams at AU unless it is explicitly stated in the academic regulations or course description that they may not. The new rules have been implemented in the individual academic regulations and course descriptions, therefore it might be beneficial to read these and understand how it applies to your course(s).

本地化显示 only

AU Educate tells teaching staff that GAI is allowed in all AU exams from fall 2024 unless programme or course rules explicitly disallow it.

采购

Aarhus University staff guidance says all students and staff have access to a Microsoft Copilot version similar to free ChatGPT, that no university-wide guidelines for which GAI applications are allowed have been adopted, and that purchases of systems and licences must be handled with the unit, AU IT and AU Finance.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: copilot_access_no_university_wide_allowed_app_guidelines_purchases_with_unit_it_finance

原始证据

证据 1
In addition to access to all free GAI applications, all students and staff have access to the version of the Microsoft Copilot which is similar to the free version of ChatGPT. No university-wide guidelines for which GAI applications staff and students are allowed to use have been adopted. However, any purchases of systems and licenses must be carried out in collaboration between the individual unit and AU IT and AU Finance.

本地化显示 only

AU staff guidance notes Copilot access for students and staff, no adopted university-wide list of allowed GAI applications, and central handling of purchases with AU IT and AU Finance.

隐私

AU Library guidance says students using AI to transcribe interviews should consider legality and good academic practice, including responsibility for personal and confidential data, informant consent, GDPR compliance, secure storage and deletion when data is no longer needed.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: ai_interview_transcription_requires_personal_data_responsibility_consent_gdpr_secure_storage_deletion

原始证据

证据 1
As a student, you are responsible for your use of AI in your work. If you want to use an AI tool to transcribe your interviews, you should carefully consider the entire process in relation to legality and good academic practice. Always be aware of: As a student, you are responsible for data when processing personal data and confidential information. Have your informants given consent to the processing? Consider which AI technology you are using and whether it complies with GDPR legislation.

本地化显示 only

AU Library tells students to treat AI interview transcription as a data-protection and consent workflow, not just a technical tool choice.

Source record

官方来源

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Aarhus University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/aarhus-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志