Coursework & Assessment
Faculty Guidelines
Campus-wide blanket permission to use generative AI for coursework is unverified; study boards and faculty curricula (e.g. Humanities Section 9) govern specific requirements.
Copenhagen, Denmark Last checked
University of Copenhagen
Compare universities
Selected universities1/4
University of Copenhagen
Independent · Open access · Not an official university page
What would you like to check?
Explore the current record by topic
Exams & In-Person Assessment
SCIENCE Curriculum
The Faculty of SCIENCE curriculum says students must comply with university rules and guidelines on generative AI in projects and exams, including the mandatory AI declaration.
AI Disclosure & Declarations
Mandatory Where Permitted
Under the Humanities curriculum, students must declare if and how generative AI was used in exams where its use is permitted; the declaration is a formal curriculum requirement.
Privacy & Data Protection
Unverified Student Gap
Current personal data entry restrictions remain unverified; retained employee guidance excerpts await official web verification and do not establish student permissions or prohibitions.
Approved AI Tools
Campus Tools / Terms Gap
Current institutional tool entitlement and terms remain unverified; retained tool discovery records do not constitute a present permission.
Research & Authorship
Authorship Policy Gap
Current scholarly publication AI authorship and disclosure rules remain unverified; existing excerpts await official web verification.
More reviewed record topics
Academic Integrity
Regulations Apply
Breach of examination rules and disciplinary regulations may result in formal sanctions, including expulsion from exams or from the university.
Teaching Practice
Pending Verification
Official university teaching principles and CRAFT project materials were not retrieved in local crawl extractions; pending independent source verification.
Security & Procurement
Pending Verification
Commercial software procurement evaluations and institutional agreements for library-listed tools were not verified in local crawl extractions.
Before you submit
Do
- Check the course and examination instructions for the rules that apply to your work.
- For an exam where generative AI is permitted under the Humanities curriculum, declare if and how you used it.
Don’t
- Check the applicable faculty examination rules before using generative AI.
- Do not breach examination rules or disciplinary regulations, which may result in expulsion from the examination or the university.
Tool discovery records: scope pending review
Tool discovery information and cited sources are retained. Current account eligibility, cost, endorsement and assessment permission are not confirmed.
ChatGPT
Access conditions (discovery record)
The following discovery information is retained; currentness and complete eligibility remain unverified.
Discovery record and cited evidence
University of Copenhagen guidance says the Copilot Enterprise-only guideline means employees must avoid using ChatGPT or other non-licensed generative AI in their work for UCPH.
Official source ↗78f1eb1ac066448aa2842c6e4b01d8d05789d4d4cfcfacb632a985b316207682
The guideline to only use Copilot Enterprise means that, as an employee, you must avoid using ChatGPT or other non-licensed generative AI in your work for UCPH.
Official source ↗78f1eb1ac066448aa2842c6e4b01d8d05789d4d4cfcfacb632a985b316207682
Copilot
Access conditions (discovery record)
The following discovery information is retained; currentness and complete eligibility remain unverified.
Discovery record and cited evidence
University of Copenhagen guidance says the Copilot Enterprise-only guideline means employees must avoid using ChatGPT or other non-licensed generative AI in their work for UCPH.
Official source ↗78f1eb1ac066448aa2842c6e4b01d8d05789d4d4cfcfacb632a985b316207682
The guideline to only use Copilot Enterprise means that, as an employee, you must avoid using ChatGPT or other non-licensed generative AI in your work for UCPH.
Official source ↗78f1eb1ac066448aa2842c6e4b01d8d05789d4d4cfcfacb632a985b316207682
Microsoft Copilot Enterprise
Access conditions (discovery record)
The following discovery information is retained; currentness and complete eligibility remain unverified.
Use the University-licensed Copilot Enterprise/Microsoft 365 service; the cited page provides Edge and Microsoft 365 entry points.
Not stated.
Discovery record and cited evidence
Security-approved Microsoft Copilot Enterprise licensed by the University of Copenhagen for staff and students.
Copenhagen University Library says Microsoft Copilot is licensed by the University of Copenhagen for both staff and students. For work, it directs users primarily to security-approved Microsoft Copilot Enterprise, licensed by the University of Copenhagen.
Official source ↗0f9d8d1410c7ef8bfbf2a1586fc301b905e1239e3cc251e1c91ac84d555f13af
Primo Research Assistant
Access conditions (discovery record)
The following discovery information is retained; currentness and complete eligibility remain unverified.
Log in to the University Library catalogue, then open Research Assistant.
Not stated.
Discovery record and cited evidence
University Library-supported generative-AI research assistant embedded in the library catalogue.
The University Library directory says only tools supported by Research Support are displayed. It identifies Primo Research Assistant as the generative-AI tool embedded in the library catalogue and says users must be logged in to the catalogue to access it.
Official source ↗0f9d8d1410c7ef8bfbf2a1586fc301b905e1239e3cc251e1c91ac84d555f13af
Record updates
Updates to this site's reviewed record, not confirmation that the university changed its policy.
Other records · Page update
View revision
Loading revision…
Reviewed claims
0
Historical and pending public Claims (9)
These original public records and sources remain traceable. They are excluded from current topics, FAQ, submission and Analysis conclusions and do not establish current permission.
cl-university-of-copenhagen-asreview-379 · excluded_pending_review
researchers
Source object from library research tools page is unverified in official crawled bytes; held pending independent verification of current institutional tool availability.
Record historyAI tool use 1 reviewed claim
ASReview is listed for University of Copenhagen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Reviewed
Scope: researchers
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University Library directory says only tools supported by Research Support are displayed. It lists ASReview as open-source software using machine learning for systematic reviews and says the software must be installed on the user's computer.Localized display only
The University Library directory says only tools supported by Research Support are displayed. It lists ASReview as open-source software using machine learning for systematic reviews and says the software must be installed on the user's computer.
cl-university-of-copenhagen-microsoft-copilot-380 · excluded_pending_review
university-wide
Source object from library research tools page is unverified in official crawled bytes; held pending independent verification of current institutional tool availability.
Record historyAI tool use 1 reviewed claim
Microsoft Copilot Enterprise is listed for University of Copenhagen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Reviewed
Scope: university-wide
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Copenhagen University Library says Microsoft Copilot is licensed by the University of Copenhagen for both staff and students. For work, it directs users primarily to security-approved Microsoft Copilot Enterprise, licensed by the University of Copenhagen.Localized display only
Copenhagen University Library says Microsoft Copilot is licensed by the University of Copenhagen for both staff and students. For work, it directs users primarily to security-approved Microsoft Copilot Enterprise, licensed by the University of Copenhagen.
cl-university-of-copenhagen-primo-research-assistant-381 · excluded_pending_review
university-wide
Source object from library research tools page is unverified in official crawled bytes; held pending independent verification of current institutional tool availability.
Record historyAI tool use 1 reviewed claim
Primo Research Assistant is listed for University of Copenhagen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Reviewed
Scope: university-wide
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University Library directory says only tools supported by Research Support are displayed. It identifies Primo Research Assistant as the generative-AI tool embedded in the library catalogue and says users must be logged in to the catalogue to access it.Localized display only
The University Library directory says only tools supported by Research Support are displayed. It identifies Primo Research Assistant as the generative-AI tool embedded in the library catalogue and says users must be logged in to the catalogue to access it.
cl-university-of-copenhagen-ucloud-transcriber-382 · excluded_pending_review
researchers
Source object from library research tools page is unverified in official crawled bytes; held pending independent verification of current institutional tool availability.
Record historyAI tool use 1 reviewed claim
Transcriber (UCloud) is listed for University of Copenhagen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Reviewed
Scope: researchers
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University Library directory says only tools supported by Research Support are displayed. It lists Transcriber as a UCloud application that automatically converts audio and video files to text and directs users to find it under UCloud Applications.Localized display only
The University Library directory says only tools supported by Research Support are displayed. It lists Transcriber as a UCloud application that automatically converts audio and video files to text and directs users to find it under UCloud Applications.
claim-ucph-phd-ai-thesis-disclosure · excluded_pending_review
phd_researchers
PhD thesis AI guideline PDF is unverified in official crawled source objects; held pending independent verification without inferring absence of policy.
Record historyResearch 1 reviewed claim
University of Copenhagen PhD guidance says AI-assisted technologies used in a thesis must be clearly disclosed and described, cannot be listed as an author, and leave the PhD student responsible for accuracy, integrity, and originality.
Reviewed
Scope: phd researchers
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1if you use AI-assisted technologies in your thesis it must be clearly disclosed, and the use must be described. The AI-assisted technology cannot be listed as an author. You are therefore solely responsible for the accuracy, integrity, and originality of the work.Evidence locator: Guidelines, first page
claim-ucph-publication-ai-authorship · excluded_pending_review
research_authors
Scholarly authorship guidance PDF is unverified in official crawled bytes (package excerpt only); held pending independent verification of current institutional authorship rules.
Record historyclaim-ucph-employee-ai-data-limits · excluded_pending_review
employees
KUNET employee newsroom guidance is unverified in official crawled bytes (package excerpt only); held pending independent verification of current employee data rules.
Record historyPrivacy 1 reviewed claim
University of Copenhagen employee guidance says employees may not enter personal data or confidential or copyrighted information into generative AI tools and should use only the licensed Copilot Enterprise tool for UCPH work.
Reviewed
Scope: employees
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1As an employee at UCPH, you can now read the first guidelines on how you are allowed to use generative AI tools in your work at the University. You may not enter personal data. You may not enter confidential or copyrighted information. Only use Copilot Enterprise for which UCPH has bought a license.Evidence locator: Guideline list near the start of the public shared KUnet news item
claim-ucph-employees-avoid-unlicensed-genai · excluded_pending_review
employees
KUNET employee newsroom guidance is unverified in official crawled bytes (package excerpt only); held pending independent verification of current employee licensing rules.
Record historyAI tool use 1 reviewed claim
University of Copenhagen guidance says the Copilot Enterprise-only guideline means employees must avoid using ChatGPT or other non-licensed generative AI in their work for UCPH.
Reviewed
Scope: employees
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1The guideline to only use Copilot Enterprise means that, as an employee, you must avoid using ChatGPT or other non-licensed generative AI in your work for UCPH.Evidence locator: A more secure AI tool section
claim-ucph-research-tools-copilot-primary · excluded_pending_review
researchers_and_students
Library researcher tools guidance is unverified in official crawled bytes (package excerpt only); held pending independent verification of current institutional tool availability.
Record historySecurity Review 1 reviewed claim
The University of Copenhagen researcher tools page says staff and students may use Microsoft Copilot, and that work needing a generative AI tool should primarily use Microsoft Copilot Enterprise because it is security-approved and licensed by the university.
Reviewed
Scope: researchers and students
Last checked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Copilot, developed by Microsoft, is licensed by University of Copenhagen, allowing both staff and students to use it. If you need a generative AI tool for your work, you should primarily use Microsoft Copilot Enterprise, which is security-approved and licensed by University of Copenhagen.Evidence locator: AI Tools, Microsoft Copilot entry
Official sources
4 official URLs; 5 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
Guideline on the use of AI-assisted technologies for PhD theses
phd.ku.dk
University official source
phd.ku.dk
Hash and captured version
Guideline on the use of AI-assisted technologies for PhD theses · 2026-05-14T04:08:17.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
30c3a8ee532752bf0c3e091e7292c31506b46ee6d0f66667bc112397061ffa86
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Three guidelines and a new tool for using AI
pkunet-shared.ku.dk
University official source
pkunet-shared.ku.dk
Hash and captured version
Three guidelines and a new tool for using AI · 2026-05-14T04:06:39.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
78f1eb1ac066448aa2842c6e4b01d8d05789d4d4cfcfacb632a985b316207682
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Tools for Researchers
kub.ku.dk
University official source
kub.ku.dk
Hash and captured version
Tools for Researchers · 2026-05-14T04:07:57.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
43ee56966fdd2006de8abd14963e5986a53510b95cd31699b1b50dcc732f4934
Tools for Researchers – University of Copenhagen · 2026-07-15T23:41:43.896Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
0f9d8d1410c7ef8bfbf2a1586fc301b905e1239e3cc251e1c91ac84d555f13af
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
University of Copenhagen guidelines on authorship of scholarly publications
praksisudvalget.ku.dk
University official source
praksisudvalget.ku.dk
Hash and captured version
University of Copenhagen guidelines on authorship of scholarly publications · 2026-05-14T04:08:17.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
2fbd9f81a9cb1ab68af31f0bfd5d0d4c5b771b2a1d366050d9fbb566f82b2fa8
Hashes identify a captured version; they do not establish current policy or review approval.
Explore
Related university AI policy records
4 records
Record information, JSON & citation
Review layers: claim review applies to the claims only. Analysis is a separate machine-generated summary awaiting review. Coverage scores do not establish complete policy knowledge.
- Claim review state
- agent_reviewed
- Analysis review state
- machine_candidate
- Record revision
- v6-qs101-120-presentation-20261028
- Dataset release
- public-release-20260924-002
- Correction published
- Student snapshot
- Not published
Published V6 presentation; JSON and MCP retain the existing public record. Supplementary quotations and scope notes remain pending review. Local candidate corrections, tools and student summaries are not approved for publication. Institution-wide audit remains PARTIAL.
- Formal faculty investigation workflows and appeal procedures under Copenhagen disciplinary regulations are not fully evidenced by the examination expulsion sanction excerpt.
Questions students ask
Questions students ask
Can I use AI for my coursework?
Campus-wide blanket permission to use generative AI for coursework is unverified; study boards and faculty curricula (e.g. Humanities Section 9) govern specific requirements.
View evidence →Do I need to disclose AI use?
Under the Humanities curriculum, students must declare if and how generative AI was used in exams where its use is permitted; the declaration is a formal curriculum requirement.
View evidence →Can I upload sensitive data?
Current personal data entry restrictions remain unverified; retained employee guidance excerpts await official web verification and do not establish student permissions or prohibitions.
View evidence →Which tools can I access?
Current institutional tool entitlement and terms remain unverified; retained tool discovery records do not constitute a present permission.
View evidence →What are the examination rules?
The Faculty of SCIENCE curriculum says students must comply with university rules and guidelines on generative AI in projects and exams, including the mandatory AI declaration.
View evidence →What rules apply to research and publication?
Current scholarly publication AI authorship and disclosure rules remain unverified; existing excerpts await official web verification.
View evidence →What counts as academic misconduct?
Breach of examination rules and disciplinary regulations may result in formal sanctions, including expulsion from exams or from the university.
View evidence →What guidance applies to teaching?
Official university teaching principles and CRAFT project materials were not retrieved in local crawl extractions; pending independent source verification.
View evidence →What security and procurement requirements apply?
Commercial software procurement evaluations and institutional agreements for library-listed tools were not verified in local crawl extractions.
View evidence →