Policy presence
Institut Polytechnique de Paris has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Palaiseau Cedex, France
Institut Polytechnique de Paris
Institut Polytechnique de Paris has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 4 reviewed claims. Last checked May 10, 2026.
Institut Polytechnique de Paris AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Institut Polytechnique de Paris has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions, including 4 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 10, 2026. Discovery context: Institut Polytechnique de Paris is listed as QS 2026 rank 41.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Institut Polytechnique de Paris as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 10, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/institut-polytechnique-de-paris.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Institut Polytechnique de Paris has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Institut Polytechnique de Paris has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Institut Polytechnique de Paris has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Institut Polytechnique de Paris has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Academic integrity
Institut Polytechnique de Paris has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
Teaching guidance
Institut Polytechnique de Paris has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Institut Polytechnique de Paris has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Institut Polytechnique de Paris's 2025-2026 Master programs academic regulations prohibit the use of generative AI in assessments for those programs unless explicitly authorized by the instructor in written instructions. Unauthorized use constitutes academic misconduct.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: generative_ai_prohibited_in_assessments_unless_authorized
原始证据
Evidence 1In the context of any assessment, regardless of its form (in-class exam, take-home assignment, project, internship report, etc.), the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is strictly prohibited unless explicitly authorized by the instructor in the written instructions. Any violation will be considered academic misconduct.
Academic Integrity
Le règlement des études 2025-2026 des masters de l'Institut Polytechnique de Paris interdit l'utilisation de l'intelligence artificielle générative dans les évaluations de ces programmes, sauf autorisation explicite de l'enseignant dans ses consignes écrites. Tout manquement est considéré comme une fraude.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: generative_ai_prohibited_in_assessments_unless_authorized
原始证据
Evidence 1Dans le cadre d'une évaluation, quelle que soit sa forme (évaluation sur table, devoir à la maison, projet, rapport de stage, etc.) l'utilisation d'une intelligence artificielle (IA) générative est interdite sauf si l'enseignant l'a explicitement autorisée dans ses consignes écrites. Tout manquement sera considéré comme une fraude.
Teaching
Under Institut Polytechnique de Paris's 2025-2026 Master programs academic regulations, when generative AI use is explicitly permitted by an instructor, students must clearly acknowledge its use in accordance with standard citation practices.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_citation_required_when_authorized
原始证据
Evidence 1If generative AI is explicitly permitted, students who use it must clearly acknowledge its use in accordance with standard citation practices.
Teaching
At École polytechnique, an Institut Polytechnique de Paris member school, the Teaching & Learning Center publishes an AI resource page for instructors that includes AI-detection tools such as Turnitin, AI Text Classifier, and GPTZero.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: member_school_instructor_ai_resources_include_detection_tools
原始证据
Evidence 1Une sélection de logiciels comme Turnitin, AI Text Classifier et GPTZero, permettant d’identifier les contenus générés par l’IA et de préserver l’intégrité académique.
本地化显示 only
A selection of software such as Turnitin, AI Text Classifier and GPTZero, used to identify AI-generated content and preserve academic integrity.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Academic Regulations For Master Programs - IP Paris
ip-paris.fr
IA - Ressources pour les enseignants - Teaching & Learning Center
polytechnique.edu
Règlement des études des masters de l'Institut Polytechnique de Paris
ip-paris.fr
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.