Canberra, Australia

Australian National University (ANU)

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

30 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Australian National University (ANU) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"ANU-supported AI productivity chatbot.","howToObtain":"All staff access it via the Microsoft 365 Applications Portal or supported browser; use ANUConnect Software Request for allocation/install support.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

原始证据

证据 1
ANU's IT Services page says Microsoft Copilot is supported at ANU. All staff have access through the Microsoft 365 Applications Portal or a supported browser, with ANUConnect Software Request support for access allocation and installation.

本地化显示 only

ANU's IT Services page says Microsoft Copilot is supported at ANU. All staff have access through the Microsoft 365 Applications Portal or a supported browser, with ANUConnect Software Request support for access allocation and installation.

Source Status

ANU approved six institutional AI principles via Academic Board in June 2023, covering excellence/integrity, research engagement, clear guidance, AI literacy, access/privacy/security, and collaborative policy development.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

原始证据

证据 1
These six guiding principles on the use of artificial intelligence at the ANU were approved by the Academic Board in June 2023. We will maintain our commitment to excellence and integrity in teaching, learning, assessment and research as the applications of AI in university settings evolve.

Academic Integrity

Submitting AI-generated content as one's own work constitutes a breach of ANU's academic integrity rules.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

原始证据

证据 1
Inappropriate use of AI is unacceptable and constitutes a breach of academic integrity. If students submit AI-generated content as their own work, they are not submitting original work.

隐私

ANU academic staff are not permitted to upload student data or academic work to generative AI platforms.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

原始证据

证据 1
Academic staff are not permitted to upload student data or academic work to GenAI platforms. Therefore, it is not currently possible to generate student feedback or results using student work.

隐私

ANU prohibits using AI to collect, use, store, or disclose personal information without express consent from the individual(s).

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

原始证据

证据 1
Do not use AI to collect, use, store and/or disclose personal information, without the express consent of the individual(s).

采购

ANU requires that only university-approved AI solutions/software be used to ensure appropriate data governance, information security, and licensing.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

原始证据

证据 1
Only utilise AI solution/software approved for use by the University, to ensure appropriate data governance, information security and licencing.

隐私

Students retain IP ownership of their assignments at ANU; staff may not upload student work to AI platforms without express student consent.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

原始证据

证据 1
Students retain Intellectual Property ownership of their assignments, even when they have been submitted for assessment. Therefore, staff are not permitted to upload student work to an AI platform without their express consent.

Academic Integrity

At ANU, using AI-generated content when not permitted and claiming authorship without acknowledgment constitutes a breach of academic integrity.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

原始证据

证据 1
Using AI-generated content when not permitted and claiming authorship without acknowledgment constitutes a breach of academic integrity.

隐私

ANU prohibits uploading student work to AI platforms without consent, including for feedback or marking purposes, citing privacy and data security reasons.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

原始证据

证据 1
For privacy and data security reasons, uploading student work directly into an AI platform without their consent is not permitted, including for the purpose of feedback or marking.

Academic Integrity

ANU Law School prohibits using generative AI to draft assessment content; all submitted work must be the student's own independent and original work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

原始证据

证据 1
All work submitted for assessment at the ANU Law School must be your own independent and original work. This means that you must not use generative AI to draft your assessment content.

Academic Integrity

ANU Law School requires students to explicitly declare AI tool usage in the first footnote of submitted work, including tool names, purpose, and extent of use.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

原始证据

证据 1
In any piece of submitted work where you have used AI tools, you must explicitly declare: The name(s) of the application(s) used, The purpose for their use, The extent and frequency of their use. This declaration should be included in the first footnote.

Ai Tool Treatment

ANU endorses Copilot Enterprise as the primary AI tool for staff and students, accessed via ANU accounts; non-endorsed tools carry security risks the university cannot guarantee.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

原始证据

证据 1
Non-endorsed AI tools require you to sign up and create an account and the ANU cannot guarantee your security when using these tools. Currently, Copilot Enterprise is available for all ANU staff and students by signing in with an ANU account.

Security Review

All AI technical solutions used for ANU business or on ANU-managed devices must be approved by the university; unapproved freeware is considered a network security risk.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

原始证据

证据 1
All technical solutions being used for University business and/or on ANU managed devices must be approved by the University. Freeware poses particular risks of inadequate information security controls and unapproved software puts the ANU network at risk.

教学

ANU permits course conveners to explicitly limit or encourage generative AI use; students must check class summaries and assessment outlines for AI requirements.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

原始证据

证据 1
Generative AI may be explicitly limited in some courses and actively encouraged in others. You should look first at class summaries and assessment outlines for any AI requirements in the course.

Ai Tool Treatment

ANU treats generative AI as a permissible learning tool that can be cited as an information source, but强调 it is not a replacement for student thinking and originality.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

原始证据

证据 1
Generative AI is a permissible learning tool in higher education and can be cited as an information source. However, it is important to note that Generative AI is not a replacement for your thinking and originality.

Ai Tool Treatment

ANU provides Copilot Enterprise and Adobe Firefly as enterprise-licensed AI tools with data protection for staff and students using ANU accounts.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

原始证据

证据 1
Copilot Enterprise is available for all ANU staff and students by signing in with an ANU account. The main benefit of using CoPilot with an ANU account is that personal and company data is protected.

Academic Integrity

ANU handles suspected generative AI misuse through the same academic misconduct procedure as other integrity breaches, including giving students the opportunity to respond.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

原始证据

证据 1
The ANU procedure for suspected misuse of generative AI is the same as for any misconduct, which includes giving a student the opportunity to respond.

教学

ANU Law School permits limited AI use for improving expression in student drafts (grammar, clarity, structure) and brainstorming ideas, provided all information is independently verified.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

原始证据

证据 1
Using AI to improve expression in your own draft, such as grammar, clarity, or structure. Prompting AI for ideas or to help brainstorm — provided you verify all information independently.

Academic Integrity

ANU Law School warns that academic integrity findings related to AI misuse may have long-term consequences for law students, as misconduct must be disclosed when applying for admission to legal practice.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

原始证据

证据 1
For law students, academic integrity findings may have long-term consequences. When applying for admission to legal practice, students must disclose any misconduct findings.

Ai Tool Treatment

ANU does not ban generative AI, but the College of Asia & the Pacific distinguishes between appropriate and inappropriate uses based on whether AI replaces or supports student skill development.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

原始证据

证据 1
Generative AI is not banned at the ANU. However, that does not mean that all uses of these products and platforms are equally valid.

Academic Integrity

ANU CAP guidelines identify using AI-produced text as one's own, using AI to generate assignment structures, and using AI to rephrase others' work to avoid plagiarism detection as inappropriate uses that constitute academic integrity issues.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

原始证据

证据 1
Using AI-produced text 'as your own' — This is a clear academic integrity issue - a student doing this is passing off the work of someone/thing as their own.

教学

ANU allows individual colleges and disciplines to set their own policies on whether AI is permitted for specific assessment tasks, rather than imposing a university-wide blanket rule.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度85%

原始证据

证据 1
Whether AI is permitted for assessments will vary greatly across different assessment tasks, colleges and disciplines. Educators are advised to check with their College or ADE for any College-wide advice or guidance.

教学

ANU guidance acknowledges that traditional assessments like generic essays and multiple-choice tests are more vulnerable to AI misuse, and recommends redesigning tasks with authentic, specific contexts.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度85%

原始证据

证据 1
Essays and other traditional assessments, such as quizzes and multiple-choice tests may be more vulnerable to AI misuse. An essay task with a generic or broad topic is quite vulnerable.

研究

The ANU Library LibGuide references the ARC policy requiring disclosure of generative AI use in grant applications, accuracy verification, and originality compliance.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度85%

原始证据

证据 1
The policy outlines the acceptable use of generative AI tools in the preparation and submission of grant applications to ensure integrity and transparency. Disclosure: Applicants must disclose the use of generative AI in their applications.

Academic Integrity

ANU was developing governance document changes to require students to acknowledge any use of artificial intelligence in their work (as of early 2023).

审核: 智能体已审核置信度85%

原始证据

证据 1
Minor changes to a range of relevant governance documents and academic integrity guidance for students are also being considered. Once approved, these changes are likely to require students to acknowledge any use of artificial intelligence in their work.

教学

ANU CAP guidelines state there is a very strong presumption against any use of generative AI or translation programs in language courses, and advise non-language students to check with convenors before using AI for translation.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度85%

原始证据

证据 1
For non-language courses: Translation is not a neutral act... students should actively check with a convenor whether using generative AI or some other translation system is appropriate. For any language course: There is a very strong presumption against any use of generative AI or other translation program.

研究

The ANU Library LibGuide catalogs major publisher policies on AI: ACM prohibits AI authorship but permits disclosed use; Nature, Science, Elsevier, IEEE, and others require disclosure of AI use in manuscripts.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度80%

原始证据

证据 1
Generative AI tools and technologies, such as ChatGPT, may not be listed as authors of an ACM published Work. The use of generative AI tools and technologies to create content is permitted but must be fully disclosed in the Work.

Source Status

ANU maintains a 'Generative AI and Assessment' resource collection providing step-by-step advice on designing assessments in the age of AI, covering assessment planning, evaluation, and approach determination.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度60%

原始证据

证据 1
Step-by-step advice on designing assessments that reflect real student capabilities in the age of AI. Rethinking assessment design in the age of GenAI.

Source Status

ANU published a PDF FAQ document 'Chat GPT and other generative AI tools: What ANU academics need to know' covering ChatGPT introduction, assessment impact, and institutional response (content also referenced in ANU's blog post).

审核: 智能体已审核置信度60%

原始证据

证据 1
Chat GPT and other generative AI tools: What ANU academics need to know. PDF covering introduction to ChatGPT, potential impact on assessment design and academic integrity, action ANU is taking, steps for course conveners.

Source Status

ANU maintains an 'AI Essentials' resource collection for using supported AI tools while discussing best practice with students.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度55%

原始证据

证据 1
Make use of supported artificial intelligence tools at ANU while speaking to students about best practice.

Source record

官方来源

13 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Australian National University (ANU) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/anu

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志