University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API indexGitHub repo

Canberra, Australia

Australian National University (ANU)

Australian National University (ANU) is listed as QS 2026 rank =32. Australian National University (ANU) has 29 source-backed AI policy claim records from 12 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Last checkedMay 10, 2026Last changedMay 10, 2026Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Public JSONCitation rulesDataset access

Citation-ready overview

v1 public contract

Australian National University (ANU) is listed as QS 2026 rank =32. Australian National University (ANU) has 29 source-backed AI policy claim records from 12 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Reviewed claims29Candidate claims0Official sources12

Candidate claims are source-backed records pending review. They are not final policy conclusions and are not legal or academic integrity advice.

Reviewed claims

29 reviewed public claim

Source Status

ANU approved six institutional AI principles via Academic Board in June 2023, covering excellence/integrity, research engagement, clear guidance, AI literacy, access/privacy/security, and collaborative policy development.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
These six guiding principles on the use of artificial intelligence at the ANU were approved by the Academic Board in June 2023. We will maintain our commitment to excellence and integrity in teaching, learning, assessment and research as the applications of AI in university settings evolve.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
e1b0ca8c18b24537469a847921d1cade147da444a5d3b124525c62ae59a4925f
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Main content, opening paragraph

Academic Integrity

Submitting AI-generated content as one's own work constitutes a breach of ANU's academic integrity rules.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Inappropriate use of AI is unacceptable and constitutes a breach of academic integrity. If students submit AI-generated content as their own work, they are not submitting original work.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
c7252a03435cd57b4d1a2f7804921fe0f6cb8902fbd7072a2514e3610f660996
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Examples of messaging to educate students academic integrity and AI

Privacy

ANU academic staff are not permitted to upload student data or academic work to generative AI platforms.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Academic staff are not permitted to upload student data or academic work to GenAI platforms. Therefore, it is not currently possible to generate student feedback or results using student work.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
c7252a03435cd57b4d1a2f7804921fe0f6cb8902fbd7072a2514e3610f660996
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Using AI for feedback and marking

Privacy

ANU prohibits using AI to collect, use, store, or disclose personal information without express consent from the individual(s).

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Do not use AI to collect, use, store and/or disclose personal information, without the express consent of the individual(s).
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b0510bd3358a1cf317fa15054e74bac833e38eb0374ef8b3fa4d63a7b868bc22
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Principles

Procurement

ANU requires that only university-approved AI solutions/software be used to ensure appropriate data governance, information security, and licensing.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Only utilise AI solution/software approved for use by the University, to ensure appropriate data governance, information security and licencing.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b0510bd3358a1cf317fa15054e74bac833e38eb0374ef8b3fa4d63a7b868bc22
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Principles

Privacy

Students retain IP ownership of their assignments at ANU; staff may not upload student work to AI platforms without express student consent.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Students retain Intellectual Property ownership of their assignments, even when they have been submitted for assessment. Therefore, staff are not permitted to upload student work to an AI platform without their express consent.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b0510bd3358a1cf317fa15054e74bac833e38eb0374ef8b3fa4d63a7b868bc22
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Generative AI FAQs - Can student assignments be uploaded to AI software?

Academic Integrity

At ANU, using AI-generated content when not permitted and claiming authorship without acknowledgment constitutes a breach of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Using AI-generated content when not permitted and claiming authorship without acknowledgment constitutes a breach of academic integrity.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
789884f8c5a05e1f96f324479daea3e2596bbb344161fd16c1a3344b9573b246
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: What can I do to maintain academic integrity?

Privacy

ANU prohibits uploading student work to AI platforms without consent, including for feedback or marking purposes, citing privacy and data security reasons.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
For privacy and data security reasons, uploading student work directly into an AI platform without their consent is not permitted, including for the purpose of feedback or marking.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
789884f8c5a05e1f96f324479daea3e2596bbb344161fd16c1a3344b9573b246
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Can I upload student work into AI to assist with marking?

Academic Integrity

ANU Law School prohibits using generative AI to draft assessment content; all submitted work must be the student's own independent and original work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
All work submitted for assessment at the ANU Law School must be your own independent and original work. This means that you must not use generative AI to draft your assessment content.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
33a276e33e05ed354e65cd8ecc137385c1cf60fdeb318386013dd45e918079de
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: General Expectations

Academic Integrity

ANU Law School requires students to explicitly declare AI tool usage in the first footnote of submitted work, including tool names, purpose, and extent of use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
In any piece of submitted work where you have used AI tools, you must explicitly declare: The name(s) of the application(s) used, The purpose for their use, The extent and frequency of their use. This declaration should be included in the first footnote.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
33a276e33e05ed354e65cd8ecc137385c1cf60fdeb318386013dd45e918079de
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Disclosure Requirement

Ai Tool Treatment

ANU endorses Copilot Enterprise as the primary AI tool for staff and students, accessed via ANU accounts; non-endorsed tools carry security risks the university cannot guarantee.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Non-endorsed AI tools require you to sign up and create an account and the ANU cannot guarantee your security when using these tools. Currently, Copilot Enterprise is available for all ANU staff and students by signing in with an ANU account.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
c7252a03435cd57b4d1a2f7804921fe0f6cb8902fbd7072a2514e3610f660996
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Using AI for learning purposes

Security Review

All AI technical solutions used for ANU business or on ANU-managed devices must be approved by the university; unapproved freeware is considered a network security risk.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
All technical solutions being used for University business and/or on ANU managed devices must be approved by the University. Freeware poses particular risks of inadequate information security controls and unapproved software puts the ANU network at risk.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b0510bd3358a1cf317fa15054e74bac833e38eb0374ef8b3fa4d63a7b868bc22
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Generative AI FAQs

Teaching

ANU permits course conveners to explicitly limit or encourage generative AI use; students must check class summaries and assessment outlines for AI requirements.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Generative AI may be explicitly limited in some courses and actively encouraged in others. You should look first at class summaries and assessment outlines for any AI requirements in the course.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b5616e0b939d44603d47e4ff7f21cbd0c0df79b2b24c97b9bc447f6af2ec432f
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: FAQs - Can I use Generative AI for my assessment?

Ai Tool Treatment

ANU treats generative AI as a permissible learning tool that can be cited as an information source, but强调 it is not a replacement for student thinking and originality.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Generative AI is a permissible learning tool in higher education and can be cited as an information source. However, it is important to note that Generative AI is not a replacement for your thinking and originality.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b5616e0b939d44603d47e4ff7f21cbd0c0df79b2b24c97b9bc447f6af2ec432f
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: FAQs - How do I use generative AI responsibly?

Ai Tool Treatment

ANU provides Copilot Enterprise and Adobe Firefly as enterprise-licensed AI tools with data protection for staff and students using ANU accounts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Copilot Enterprise is available for all ANU staff and students by signing in with an ANU account. The main benefit of using CoPilot with an ANU account is that personal and company data is protected.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b5616e0b939d44603d47e4ff7f21cbd0c0df79b2b24c97b9bc447f6af2ec432f
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: FAQs - Which Generative AI tools should I choose?

Academic Integrity

ANU handles suspected generative AI misuse through the same academic misconduct procedure as other integrity breaches, including giving students the opportunity to respond.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The ANU procedure for suspected misuse of generative AI is the same as for any misconduct, which includes giving a student the opportunity to respond.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
789884f8c5a05e1f96f324479daea3e2596bbb344161fd16c1a3344b9573b246
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: What if I suspect a student has misused AI?

Teaching

ANU Law School permits limited AI use for improving expression in student drafts (grammar, clarity, structure) and brainstorming ideas, provided all information is independently verified.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Using AI to improve expression in your own draft, such as grammar, clarity, or structure. Prompting AI for ideas or to help brainstorm — provided you verify all information independently.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
33a276e33e05ed354e65cd8ecc137385c1cf60fdeb318386013dd45e918079de
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: What May Be Permitted (with Caution)

Academic Integrity

ANU Law School warns that academic integrity findings related to AI misuse may have long-term consequences for law students, as misconduct must be disclosed when applying for admission to legal practice.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
For law students, academic integrity findings may have long-term consequences. When applying for admission to legal practice, students must disclose any misconduct findings.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
33a276e33e05ed354e65cd8ecc137385c1cf60fdeb318386013dd45e918079de
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Academic Integrity and Assessment Impact

Ai Tool Treatment

ANU does not ban generative AI, but the College of Asia & the Pacific distinguishes between appropriate and inappropriate uses based on whether AI replaces or supports student skill development.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Generative AI is not banned at the ANU. However, that does not mean that all uses of these products and platforms are equally valid.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
c67228d0669efc705a646637a03ea29ab21c27a1113b0f13b07c2ea980e37619
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: The challenge of generative AI

Academic Integrity

ANU CAP guidelines identify using AI-produced text as one's own, using AI to generate assignment structures, and using AI to rephrase others' work to avoid plagiarism detection as inappropriate uses that constitute academic integrity issues.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Using AI-produced text 'as your own' — This is a clear academic integrity issue - a student doing this is passing off the work of someone/thing as their own.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
c67228d0669efc705a646637a03ea29ab21c27a1113b0f13b07c2ea980e37619
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Inappropriate uses of generative AI

Teaching

ANU allows individual colleges and disciplines to set their own policies on whether AI is permitted for specific assessment tasks, rather than imposing a university-wide blanket rule.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Whether AI is permitted for assessments will vary greatly across different assessment tasks, colleges and disciplines. Educators are advised to check with their College or ADE for any College-wide advice or guidance.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
c7252a03435cd57b4d1a2f7804921fe0f6cb8902fbd7072a2514e3610f660996
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Using AI for assessment purposes

Teaching

ANU guidance acknowledges that traditional assessments like generic essays and multiple-choice tests are more vulnerable to AI misuse, and recommends redesigning tasks with authentic, specific contexts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Essays and other traditional assessments, such as quizzes and multiple-choice tests may be more vulnerable to AI misuse. An essay task with a generic or broad topic is quite vulnerable.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
789884f8c5a05e1f96f324479daea3e2596bbb344161fd16c1a3344b9573b246
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Can I still ask students to complete essays, quizzes and multiple choice tests?

Research

The ANU Library LibGuide references the ARC policy requiring disclosure of generative AI use in grant applications, accuracy verification, and originality compliance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The policy outlines the acceptable use of generative AI tools in the preparation and submission of grant applications to ensure integrity and transparency. Disclosure: Applicants must disclose the use of generative AI in their applications.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
0f552c03aa430982f5913d6fb10b66812f20fe669eabe2ee769bde2e0fc21665
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Australian Research Council Policy

Academic Integrity

ANU was developing governance document changes to require students to acknowledge any use of artificial intelligence in their work (as of early 2023).

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Minor changes to a range of relevant governance documents and academic integrity guidance for students are also being considered. Once approved, these changes are likely to require students to acknowledge any use of artificial intelligence in their work.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
39ff7c8654292c8c3b2daf67e88f720c2499f6ffff58a1d1b3d55304447a6397
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: What's next?

Teaching

ANU CAP guidelines state there is a very strong presumption against any use of generative AI or translation programs in language courses, and advise non-language students to check with convenors before using AI for translation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence85%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
For non-language courses: Translation is not a neutral act... students should actively check with a convenor whether using generative AI or some other translation system is appropriate. For any language course: There is a very strong presumption against any use of generative AI or other translation program.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
c67228d0669efc705a646637a03ea29ab21c27a1113b0f13b07c2ea980e37619
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: A note on translation and generative AI

Research

The ANU Library LibGuide catalogs major publisher policies on AI: ACM prohibits AI authorship but permits disclosed use; Nature, Science, Elsevier, IEEE, and others require disclosure of AI use in manuscripts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence80%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Generative AI tools and technologies, such as ChatGPT, may not be listed as authors of an ACM published Work. The use of generative AI tools and technologies to create content is permitted but must be fully disclosed in the Work.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
0f552c03aa430982f5913d6fb10b66812f20fe669eabe2ee769bde2e0fc21665
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Publisher guidelines - ACM

Source Status

ANU maintains a 'Generative AI and Assessment' resource collection providing step-by-step advice on designing assessments in the age of AI, covering assessment planning, evaluation, and approach determination.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence60%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Step-by-step advice on designing assessments that reflect real student capabilities in the age of AI. Rethinking assessment design in the age of GenAI.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
619f3a5b59f983e211f6c4da9fb11a74fe4b27cf6e8a11adc366cdd00928bdbb
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Page content

Source Status

ANU published a PDF FAQ document 'Chat GPT and other generative AI tools: What ANU academics need to know' covering ChatGPT introduction, assessment impact, and institutional response (content also referenced in ANU's blog post).

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence60%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Chat GPT and other generative AI tools: What ANU academics need to know. PDF covering introduction to ChatGPT, potential impact on assessment design and academic integrity, action ANU is taking, steps for course conveners.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
9b6964b1e0bb6f87afb1dc13e1d006206e3536cc84aaded5e0a694e0761927d0
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
PDF metadata (from anu-010 blog referencing this document)

Source Status

ANU maintains an 'AI Essentials' resource collection for using supported AI tools while discussing best practice with students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence55%
Last checked
May 9, 2026
Last changed
May 10, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Make use of supported artificial intelligence tools at ANU while speaking to students about best practice.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
262332f55b5682ca4cc16b8dd5ba713b56ac063c9654d65e3d9d6f012507cea9
Retrieved
May 9, 2026
Evidence locator
Page content

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

12 source attribution

Back to universities