建议做
Alzette, Luxembourg
University of Luxembourg
本站使用指南
读保存指导并确认当前课程规则。
本预览未能核当前官方指导；已存资料保留早前证据，不认证当前课程许可或学生UniGPT访问。
本站解读；官方证据保留原文。
尚无完整的学生政策摘要；可先查看已收录条款及来源。
适用范围与过渡细节
本预览未能核当前官方指导；已存资料保留早前证据，不认证当前课程许可或学生UniGPT访问。
AI 工具与获取方式
能获取工具不等于获准在作业中使用。请同时核对任务规则、适用人员和数据限制。
存档工具记录；当前获取方式请核对官方来源。 以下获取说明与证据引用保留原文语言。
- Microsoft Copilot工具提及；未确认校方提供尚未确认可用性
获取条件与官方原文
- UniGPT工具提及；未确认校方提供尚未确认可用性
获取条件与官方原文
官方来源 1 ↗原文引用
University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.
Reviewed record
已审核条款
5 条已审核条款
学术诚信4 条已审核条款
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.
审核: 智能体已审核
标准化值: genai_disclosure_course_specific
原始证据
证据 1The use of Generative AI must be disclosed in accordance with the specific guidelines communicated for each course and assessment.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.
审核: 智能体已审核
标准化值: non_permitted_ai_practices
原始证据
证据 1Unless explicitly authorised by the course guidelines, the following uses are non-permitted and may constitute academic misconduct: Submitting text, code, images, or other outputs generated fully or partly by AI as if they were entirely one's own work... Generating or altering data to create fake datasets, results, quotes, references, or evidence... Citing non-existent sources supplied by AI... Running outputs through multiple AI tools to conceal AI involvement.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.
审核: 智能体已审核
标准化值: chatbot_assignment_disclosure
原始证据
证据 1If you decide to use a chatbot for an assignment, be sure to adhere to the principles of academic integrity. This means properly citing the chatbot as a source and disclosing in which parts of the text it has been used and how it has influenced the text.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
审核: 智能体已审核
标准化值: unauthorized_chatbot_use_disciplinary_procedure
原始证据
证据 1A substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use in an assignment will trigger the disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
AI 工具使用规则1 条已审核条款
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.
审核: 智能体已审核
标准化值: microsoft_copilot_supported_unigpt_staff
原始证据
证据 1The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot. Students are encouraged to prioritise this tool, as it is supported within the University environment and offers stronger institutional safeguards than other public platforms. In February 2026, the University of Luxembourg launched UniGPT... At present, access to UniGPT is limited to University staff.
Source record
官方来源
2 个来源
展开官方来源列表
Chatbots and student assessment
uni.lu
- 快照哈希
- e0b4f0f9…
Guidelines on the Use of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning
uni.lu
记录信息、JSON 与引用
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Luxembourg AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-luxembourg
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
打开变更日志Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.