Alzette, Luxembourg

University of Luxembourg

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%

标准化值: genai_disclosure_course_specific

原始证据

证据 1
The use of Generative AI must be disclosed in accordance with the specific guidelines communicated for each course and assessment.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: microsoft_copilot_supported_unigpt_staff

原始证据

证据 1
The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot. Students are encouraged to prioritise this tool, as it is supported within the University environment and offers stronger institutional safeguards than other public platforms. In February 2026, the University of Luxembourg launched UniGPT... At present, access to UniGPT is limited to University staff.

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度89%

标准化值: non_permitted_ai_practices

原始证据

证据 1
Unless explicitly authorised by the course guidelines, the following uses are non-permitted and may constitute academic misconduct: Submitting text, code, images, or other outputs generated fully or partly by AI as if they were entirely one's own work... Generating or altering data to create fake datasets, results, quotes, references, or evidence... Citing non-existent sources supplied by AI... Running outputs through multiple AI tools to conceal AI involvement.

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度87%

标准化值: chatbot_assignment_disclosure

原始证据

证据 1
If you decide to use a chatbot for an assignment, be sure to adhere to the principles of academic integrity. This means properly citing the chatbot as a source and disclosing in which parts of the text it has been used and how it has influenced the text.

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度86%

标准化值: unauthorized_chatbot_use_disciplinary_procedure

原始证据

证据 1
A substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use in an assignment will trigger the disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.

Source record

官方来源

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度91%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Luxembourg AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-luxembourg

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志