Do
- Confirm the current course and assessment instructions.
- Read the saved tool audience before seeking access.
- Check where and how permitted use must be disclosed.
Alzette, Luxembourg
University of Luxembourg
Student guide · Task scope and procedure
Read the saved guidance and confirm the current course rule.
Current official guidance could not be checked for this preview. Saved claims retain their earlier evidence; they do not certify current course permission or student UniGPT access.
A complete student policy summary is not available yet; see the collected claims and sources.
Scope and transition details
Current official guidance could not be checked for this preview. Saved claims retain their earlier evidence; they do not certify current course permission or student UniGPT access.
Don't
- Do not pass generated output off as your own.
- Do not turn staff UniGPT access into student access.
- Do not treat saved evidence as current course approval.
AI tools & access
Tool access is not permission to use AI in an assessment. Check your assignment rules, eligible users and data restrictions.
Archived tool record; consult the official source for current access.
- Microsoft CopilotTool mentioned; institutional access not establishedAvailability not established
Access, conditions & official evidence
Source 1 ↗Original quotation
The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot.
- UniGPTTool mentioned; institutional access not establishedAvailability not established
Access, conditions & official evidence
Source 1 ↗Original quotation
University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.
Reviewed record
Reviewed claims
5 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity4 reviewed claims
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_disclosure_course_specific
Original evidence
Evidence 1The use of Generative AI must be disclosed in accordance with the specific guidelines communicated for each course and assessment.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: non_permitted_ai_practices
Original evidence
Evidence 1Unless explicitly authorised by the course guidelines, the following uses are non-permitted and may constitute academic misconduct: Submitting text, code, images, or other outputs generated fully or partly by AI as if they were entirely one's own work... Generating or altering data to create fake datasets, results, quotes, references, or evidence... Citing non-existent sources supplied by AI... Running outputs through multiple AI tools to conceal AI involvement.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: chatbot_assignment_disclosure
Original evidence
Evidence 1If you decide to use a chatbot for an assignment, be sure to adhere to the principles of academic integrity. This means properly citing the chatbot as a source and disclosing in which parts of the text it has been used and how it has influenced the text.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unauthorized_chatbot_use_disciplinary_procedure
Original evidence
Evidence 1A substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use in an assignment will trigger the disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Ai Tool Treatment1 reviewed claim
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: microsoft_copilot_supported_unigpt_staff
Original evidence
Evidence 1The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot. Students are encouraged to prioritise this tool, as it is supported within the University environment and offers stronger institutional safeguards than other public platforms. In February 2026, the University of Luxembourg launched UniGPT... At present, access to UniGPT is limited to University staff.
Source record
Official sources
2 sources
Open official source list
Chatbots and student assessment
uni.lu
- Snapshot hash
- e0b4f0f9…
Guidelines on the Use of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning
uni.lu
- Source URL
- https://www.uni.lu/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2026/02/25170716/2026-Guidelines-AI-I2TL-16022026.pdf
- Snapshot hash
- b25b8a04…
Record information, JSON & citation
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Luxembourg AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-luxembourg
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Open change logSaved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.