University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Alzette, Luxembourg

University of Luxembourg

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: =381UpdatedMay 16, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: genai_disclosure_course_specific

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The use of Generative AI must be disclosed in accordance with the specific guidelines communicated for each course and assessment.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b25b8a04…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Guidelines for learning; Disclosure requirements

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: microsoft_copilot_supported_unigpt_staff

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot. Students are encouraged to prioritise this tool, as it is supported within the University environment and offers stronger institutional safeguards than other public platforms. In February 2026, the University of Luxembourg launched UniGPT... At present, access to UniGPT is limited to University staff.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b25b8a04…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
AI tools supported by the University of Luxembourg

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%

Normalized value: non_permitted_ai_practices

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Unless explicitly authorised by the course guidelines, the following uses are non-permitted and may constitute academic misconduct: Submitting text, code, images, or other outputs generated fully or partly by AI as if they were entirely one's own work... Generating or altering data to create fake datasets, results, quotes, references, or evidence... Citing non-existent sources supplied by AI... Running outputs through multiple AI tools to conceal AI involvement.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
b25b8a04…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Risks and limitations; Non-permitted AI practices

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%

Normalized value: chatbot_assignment_disclosure

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
If you decide to use a chatbot for an assignment, be sure to adhere to the principles of academic integrity. This means properly citing the chatbot as a source and disclosing in which parts of the text it has been used and how it has influenced the text.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
e0b4f0f9…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Chatbots and citations - Can they be cited in an academic assignment?

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: unauthorized_chatbot_use_disciplinary_procedure

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
A substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use in an assignment will trigger the disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
e0b4f0f9…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Consequences of illicit chatbot use

Source record

Official sources

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence91%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Luxembourg AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-luxembourg

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log