academic_integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
University of Luxembourg
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Luxembourg currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
University of Luxembourg current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+10-0
11 # University of Luxembourg AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.
3+Evidence (en, b25b8a043579): The use of Generative AI must be disclosed in accordance with the specific guidelines communicated for each course and assessment.
4+ai_tool_treatment: University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.
5+Evidence (en, b25b8a043579): The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot. Students are encouraged to prioritise this tool, as it is supported within the University environment and offers stronger institutional safeguards than other public platforms. In February 2026, the University of Luxembourg launched UniGPT... At present, access to UniGPT is limited to University staff.
6+academic_integrity: University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.
7+Evidence (en, b25b8a043579): Unless explicitly authorised by the course guidelines, the following uses are non-permitted and may constitute academic misconduct: Submitting text, code, images, or other outputs generated fully or partly by AI as if they were entirely one's own work... Generating or altering data to create fake datasets, results, quotes, references, or evidence... Citing non-existent sources supplied by AI... Running outputs through multiple AI tools to conceal AI involvement.
8+academic_integrity: University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.
9+Evidence (en, e0b4f0f900b1): If you decide to use a chatbot for an assignment, be sure to adhere to the principles of academic integrity. This means properly citing the chatbot as a source and disclosing in which parts of the text it has been used and how it has influenced the text.
10+academic_integrity: University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
11+Evidence (en, e0b4f0f900b1): A substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use in an assignment will trigger the disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Claim changes
5 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
2 source attributions
Chatbots and student assessment
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026
Guidelines on the Use of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026