academic_integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.
变更日志
本站历史:0 次发布记录。
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
当前收录 5 条主张、2 个官方来源。
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 University of Luxembourg。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
本站历史中暂无已记录的更新。
本站不提供法律或学术诚信建议;除链接指向大学官方页面的来源外,本站内容不代表大学官方声明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
仅展示已记录且 Claim ID 精确匹配的文字对照。
本站历史中暂无已记录的更新。
本站历史:0 次发布记录。
当前条款记录:5 条。
University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.
University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.
University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
官方来源记录:2 条。
official_guidance 本站检查时间 2026年5月16日 18:36
official_guidance 本站检查时间 2026年5月16日 18:36