À faire
- Confirm the current course and assessment instructions.
- Read the saved tool audience before seeking access.
- Check where and how permitted use must be disclosed.
Alzette, Luxembourg
University of Luxembourg
Student guide · Task scope and procedure
Read the saved guidance and confirm the current course rule.
Current official guidance could not be checked for this preview. Saved claims retain their earlier evidence; they do not certify current course permission or student UniGPT access.
Le guide ci-dessous est en anglais ; les preuves officielles restent dans leur langue d’origine.
Aucun résumé complet des règles pour les étudiants n’est disponible ; consultez les énoncés et sources recueillis.
Champ d’application et transition
Current official guidance could not be checked for this preview. Saved claims retain their earlier evidence; they do not certify current course permission or student UniGPT access.
À éviter
- Do not pass generated output off as your own.
- Do not turn staff UniGPT access into student access.
- Do not treat saved evidence as current course approval.
Outils IA et accès
L’accès à un outil ne vaut pas autorisation pour une évaluation. Vérifiez les consignes, les personnes éligibles et les restrictions de données.
Enregistrement archivé ; consultez la source officielle pour l’accès actuel. Les informations d’accès et les citations conservent leur langue originale.
- Microsoft CopilotOutil mentionné ; accès institutionnel non établiDisponibilité non établie
Accès, conditions et preuves officielles
Source officielle 1 ↗Citation originale
The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot.
- UniGPTOutil mentionné ; accès institutionnel non établiDisponibilité non établie
Accès, conditions et preuves officielles
Source officielle 1 ↗Citation originale
University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.
Source officielle 2 ↗Citation originale
In February 2026, the University of Luxembourg launched UniGPT...
Reviewed record
Énoncés examinés
5 énoncés examinés
Intégrité académique4 énoncés examinés
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
Valeur normalisée: genai_disclosure_course_specific
Preuve originale
Preuve 1The use of Generative AI must be disclosed in accordance with the specific guidelines communicated for each course and assessment.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
Valeur normalisée: non_permitted_ai_practices
Preuve originale
Preuve 1Unless explicitly authorised by the course guidelines, the following uses are non-permitted and may constitute academic misconduct: Submitting text, code, images, or other outputs generated fully or partly by AI as if they were entirely one's own work... Generating or altering data to create fake datasets, results, quotes, references, or evidence... Citing non-existent sources supplied by AI... Running outputs through multiple AI tools to conceal AI involvement.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
Valeur normalisée: chatbot_assignment_disclosure
Preuve originale
Preuve 1If you decide to use a chatbot for an assignment, be sure to adhere to the principles of academic integrity. This means properly citing the chatbot as a source and disclosing in which parts of the text it has been used and how it has influenced the text.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
Valeur normalisée: unauthorized_chatbot_use_disciplinary_procedure
Preuve originale
Preuve 1A substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use in an assignment will trigger the disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Règles d’utilisation des outils d’IA1 énoncés examinés
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
Valeur normalisée: microsoft_copilot_supported_unigpt_staff
Preuve originale
Preuve 1The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot. Students are encouraged to prioritise this tool, as it is supported within the University environment and offers stronger institutional safeguards than other public platforms. In February 2026, the University of Luxembourg launched UniGPT... At present, access to UniGPT is limited to University staff.
Source record
Sources officielles
2 sources
Ouvrir la liste des sources officielles
Chatbots and student assessment
uni.lu
- URL de la source
- https://www.uni.lu/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2023/09/Chatbots_and_student_assessment_FAQ_for_students_08062023.pdf
- Empreinte de l’instantané
- e0b4f0f9…
Guidelines on the Use of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning
uni.lu
- URL de la source
- https://www.uni.lu/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2026/02/25170716/2026-Guidelines-AI-I2TL-16022026.pdf
- Empreinte de l’instantané
- b25b8a04…
Informations, JSON et citation
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Luxembourg AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-luxembourg
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Journal des modifications ouvertSaved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.