University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Langue
ENZHFRPL

Alzette, Luxembourg

University of Luxembourg

ClassementQS World University Rankings 2026: =381Updated16 mai 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance91%

Valeur normalisée: genai_disclosure_course_specific

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
16 mai 2026
Dernière modification
16 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The use of Generative AI must be disclosed in accordance with the specific guidelines communicated for each course and assessment.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
b25b8a04…
Récupéré
16 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Guidelines for learning; Disclosure requirements

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance90%

Valeur normalisée: microsoft_copilot_supported_unigpt_staff

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
16 mai 2026
Dernière modification
16 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot. Students are encouraged to prioritise this tool, as it is supported within the University environment and offers stronger institutional safeguards than other public platforms. In February 2026, the University of Luxembourg launched UniGPT... At present, access to UniGPT is limited to University staff.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
b25b8a04…
Récupéré
16 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
AI tools supported by the University of Luxembourg

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance89%

Valeur normalisée: non_permitted_ai_practices

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
16 mai 2026
Dernière modification
16 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Unless explicitly authorised by the course guidelines, the following uses are non-permitted and may constitute academic misconduct: Submitting text, code, images, or other outputs generated fully or partly by AI as if they were entirely one's own work... Generating or altering data to create fake datasets, results, quotes, references, or evidence... Citing non-existent sources supplied by AI... Running outputs through multiple AI tools to conceal AI involvement.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
b25b8a04…
Récupéré
16 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Risks and limitations; Non-permitted AI practices

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance87%

Valeur normalisée: chatbot_assignment_disclosure

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
16 mai 2026
Dernière modification
16 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
If you decide to use a chatbot for an assignment, be sure to adhere to the principles of academic integrity. This means properly citing the chatbot as a source and disclosing in which parts of the text it has been used and how it has influenced the text.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
e0b4f0f9…
Récupéré
16 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Chatbots and citations - Can they be cited in an academic assignment?

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance86%

Valeur normalisée: unauthorized_chatbot_use_disciplinary_procedure

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
16 mai 2026
Dernière modification
16 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
A substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use in an assignment will trigger the disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
e0b4f0f9…
Récupéré
16 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Consequences of illicit chatbot use

Source record

Sources officielles

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Révisionagent reviewedConfiance91%Snapshot statusNon publiéJSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Luxembourg AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-luxembourg

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert