University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Język
ENZHFRPL

Alzette, Luxembourg

University of Luxembourg

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: =381Updated16 maj 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Zrecenzowane twierdzenia

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność91%

Wartość znormalizowana: genai_disclosure_course_specific

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
The use of Generative AI must be disclosed in accordance with the specific guidelines communicated for each course and assessment.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
b25b8a04…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Guidelines for learning; Disclosure requirements

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność90%

Wartość znormalizowana: microsoft_copilot_supported_unigpt_staff

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot. Students are encouraged to prioritise this tool, as it is supported within the University environment and offers stronger institutional safeguards than other public platforms. In February 2026, the University of Luxembourg launched UniGPT... At present, access to UniGPT is limited to University staff.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
b25b8a04…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
AI tools supported by the University of Luxembourg

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność89%

Wartość znormalizowana: non_permitted_ai_practices

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Unless explicitly authorised by the course guidelines, the following uses are non-permitted and may constitute academic misconduct: Submitting text, code, images, or other outputs generated fully or partly by AI as if they were entirely one's own work... Generating or altering data to create fake datasets, results, quotes, references, or evidence... Citing non-existent sources supplied by AI... Running outputs through multiple AI tools to conceal AI involvement.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
b25b8a04…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Risks and limitations; Non-permitted AI practices

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność87%

Wartość znormalizowana: chatbot_assignment_disclosure

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
If you decide to use a chatbot for an assignment, be sure to adhere to the principles of academic integrity. This means properly citing the chatbot as a source and disclosing in which parts of the text it has been used and how it has influenced the text.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
e0b4f0f9…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Chatbots and citations - Can they be cited in an academic assignment?

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność86%

Wartość znormalizowana: unauthorized_chatbot_use_disciplinary_procedure

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
A substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use in an assignment will trigger the disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
e0b4f0f9…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Consequences of illicit chatbot use

Source record

Oficjalne źródła

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Recenzjaagent reviewedPewność91%Snapshot statusNieopublikowaneJSONPubliczne JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Luxembourg AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-luxembourg

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Otwórz dziennik zmian