建议做

Serdang, Malaysia
本站使用指南
两个官方声明文件入口均404,未取得新候选证据。既有研究生基础claim保留历史日期,不认证现行政策。
本站解读;官方证据保留原文。
尚无完整的学生政策摘要;可先查看已收录条款及来源。
两个官方声明文件入口均404,未取得新候选证据。既有研究生基础claim保留历史日期,不认证现行政策。

能获取工具不等于获准在作业中使用。请同时核对任务规则、适用人员和数据限制。
尚未建立这所大学的可靠工具记录。这不代表工具不存在,也不代表禁止使用 AI。
这些摘要依据留存的官方来源材料;现行适用性尚未独立确认。其余摘要保留原语言,官方引文始终保留原文。
AI 明示条款
本站解读 · 官方原文见下方
The guideline recognises GenAI assistance in postgraduate thesis preparation, subject to responsibility, originality, critical evaluation, attribution and relevant professional-body rules. A form checkbox is not treated as unconditional permission for every generation activity.
GUIDELINE FOR MANAGING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USAGE IN
POSTGRADUATE THESIS
INTRODUCTION
1. Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) applications (refer to examples in Appendix 1) can be highly
beneficial for thesis preparation, but students need to use it responsibly. It can assist in various tasks
such as literature review, summarizing research papers, generating ideas, organizing content, and
proofreading. GAI tools can also help with data analysis, creating visualizations, and structuring
arguments. However, students should be mindful of over-relying on AI, ensuring that their work
remains original, critical thinking is applied, and the final thesis reflects their own understanding and
contributions. Proper attribution and ethical use of AI tools are crucial, especially when presenting
ideas in academic work.
2. In response to this emerging technology usage and to ensure the authenticity of the student’s
intellectual contribution to the thesis, this document provides a guideline for Universiti Putra Malaysia
(UPM) Postgraduate Program’s for handling thesis and viva-voce sessions.
3. UPM is expected to provide a thorough oversight and ensure the responsible incorporation of
generative AI in research and viva sessions. For programs involving professional bodies, it is subject
to regulation by the relevant professional bodies.采集日期: · 行号: 1–22
存档哈希: 48a07a190e5bc3a2aeaef2fb249c5b12601f627daeb836d50f94608d450cf6bd
AI 明示条款
本站解读 · 官方原文见下方
The thesis guideline requires students to explain where/why AI was used and distinguish affected work from their own contributions. The bilingual declaration records purpose, chapters/pages and sources and affirms AI assistance rather than replacement with human review for accuracy.
7. Students MUST:
a) demonstrate that the intellectual contributions of the thesis are predominantly their own, despite
AI assistance
b) ensure the accuracy of facts and claims in the thesis, supported by appropriate evidence and
references
c) ensure the originality of the content in their thesis
d) demonstrate a comprehensive understanding and mastery of their research contributions
e) demonstrate that he/she can maintain control over his/her research process, and AI was used as
a supporting tool
f) explain clearly and attribute appropriately where and why generative AI was used (e.g., literature
review, data preprocessing, or creative simulations)
g) outline the areas of the research that were influenced by AI-generated content versus their direct
contribution
h) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models采集日期: · 行号: 45–59
存档哈希: 48a07a190e5bc3a2aeaef2fb249c5b12601f627daeb836d50f94608d450cf6bd
AI 明示条款
本站解读 · 官方原文见下方
Postgraduate thesis students MUST demonstrate predominantly their own intellectual contribution, factual accuracy, originality, mastery and control of the research process. AI must assist rather than replace that contribution. The guideline does not provide a captured disciplinary tariff.
7. Students MUST:
a) demonstrate that the intellectual contributions of the thesis are predominantly their own, despite
AI assistance
b) ensure the accuracy of facts and claims in the thesis, supported by appropriate evidence and
references
c) ensure the originality of the content in their thesis
d) demonstrate a comprehensive understanding and mastery of their research contributions
e) demonstrate that he/she can maintain control over his/her research process, and AI was used as
a supporting tool
f) explain clearly and attribute appropriately where and why generative AI was used (e.g., literature
review, data preprocessing, or creative simulations)
g) outline the areas of the research that were influenced by AI-generated content versus their direct
contribution
h) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models采集日期: · 行号: 45–59
存档哈希: 48a07a190e5bc3a2aeaef2fb249c5b12601f627daeb836d50f94608d450cf6bd
AI 明示条款
本站解读 · 官方原文见下方
Examiners must evaluate originality and critical use/verification of AI output. The viva chair must ensure the AI-declaration areas and originality of the students contribution are examined. These are thesis/viva examination requirements, not a separately captured misconduct investigation procedure.
8. Examiners are reminded to assess the student's writing style, the depth of knowledge in the discipline,
and the originality of their contributions. Examiners MUST ensure that:
a) answer the research context in terms of clarity of the problem statement, literature review,
methodology adequacy
b) maintain control over his/her research process, and AI was used as a supporting tool
c) use AI as a tool to assist, not substitute, their research efforts and intellectual contributions
d) defend their work and achieve the novelty of the scope of the degree that the students attended
e) critically evaluate and verify the AI-generated outputs (e.g., factual accuracy, relevance, bias in
generated text or data)
f) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models
9. The Chairman must ensure that the student declares during the viva session the use of AI in the
research, clearly specifying the areas it assisted with, while affirming that the originality and novelty
of the research are their own work.采集日期: · 行号: 61–75
存档哈希: 48a07a190e5bc3a2aeaef2fb249c5b12601f627daeb836d50f94608d450cf6bd
Reviewed record
5 条已审核条款
Academic Integrity
标准化值: postgraduate_thesis_students_must_demonstrate_own_contribution_despite_ai_assistance
原始证据
证据 1Students MUST: a) demonstrate that the intellectual contributions of the thesis are predominantly their own, despite AI assistance b) ensure the accuracy of facts and claims in the thesis, supported by appropriate evidence and references c) ensure the originality of the content in their thesis d) demonstrate a comprehensive understanding and mastery of their research contributions e) demonstrate that he/she can maintain control over his/her research process, and AI was used as a supporting tool
Academic Integrity
标准化值: postgraduate_viva_requires_student_ai_use_declaration
原始证据
证据 1The Chairman must ensure that the student declares during the viva session the use of AI in the research, clearly specifying the areas it assisted with, while affirming that the originality and novelty of the research are their own work.
隐私
标准化值: postgraduate_thesis_generai_requires_ethical_data_handling
原始证据
证据 1Students MUST: h) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models ... Examiners MUST ensure that: f) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models
Ai Tool Treatment
标准化值: postgraduate_thesis_ai_use_requires_explanation_attribution_and_ai_influence_mapping
原始证据
证据 1Students MUST: f) explain clearly and attribute appropriately where and why generative AI was used (e.g., literature review, data preprocessing, or creative simulations) g) outline the areas of the research that were influenced by AI-generated content versus their direct contribution
Ai Tool Treatment
标准化值: postgraduate_thesis_ai_declaration_form_requires_assistive_tool_and_review_declaration
原始证据
证据 1I, [student's name], hereby declare that) a) The artificial intelligence technology used serves as an assistive writing tool, not a substitute for my original thinking, analysis, or research). b) All content generated has been reviewed and modified to ensure authenticity and relevance to my study).
本地化显示 only
Student declaration form: AI use is declared as an assistive writing tool, not a substitute for original thinking, analysis, or research, and generated content is declared to have been reviewed and modified.
Source record
1 个来源
sgs.upm.edu.my
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 14, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universiti-putra-malaysia
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
打开变更日志Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.