Serdang, Malaysia

Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)

本站使用指南

读历史研究生基础及补爬缺口。

两个官方声明文件入口均404,未取得新候选证据。既有研究生基础claim保留历史日期,不认证现行政策。

本站解读;官方证据保留原文。

尚无完整的学生政策摘要;可先查看已收录条款及来源。

适用范围与过渡细节

两个官方声明文件入口均404,未取得新候选证据。既有研究生基础claim保留历史日期,不认证现行政策。

Read the historical postgraduate basis and the recrawl gap. hero illustration; exact scope and conditions are in the adjacent source-linked text.
请核对所在学院及具体作业的规定。

AI 工具与获取方式

能获取工具不等于获准在作业中使用。请同时核对任务规则、适用人员和数据限制。

尚未建立这所大学的可靠工具记录。这不代表工具不存在,也不代表禁止使用 AI。

更多政策信息

已发布的来源摘要 (4)

这些摘要依据留存的官方来源材料;现行适用性尚未独立确认。其余摘要保留原语言,官方引文始终保留原文。

作业与考试许可

AI 明示条款

本站解读 · 官方原文见下方

The guideline recognises GenAI assistance in postgraduate thesis preparation, subject to responsibility, originality, critical evaluation, attribution and relevant professional-body rules. A form checkbox is not treated as unconditional permission for every generation activity.

记录的适用范围
学生 · program · UPM postgraduate thesis and viva voce · Professional-body programme regulations also apply; not university-wide undergraduate assessment rule
记录的主题
作业与考试许可
记录的约束程度
permitted
官方来源与存档引文
官方来源与存档引文 ↗
GUIDELINE FOR MANAGING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USAGE IN POSTGRADUATE THESIS INTRODUCTION 1. Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) applications (refer to examples in Appendix 1) can be highly beneficial for thesis preparation, but students need to use it responsibly. It can assist in various tasks such as literature review, summarizing research papers, generating ideas, organizing content, and proofreading. GAI tools can also help with data analysis, creating visualizations, and structuring arguments. However, students should be mindful of over-relying on AI, ensuring that their work remains original, critical thinking is applied, and the final thesis reflects their own understanding and contributions. Proper attribution and ethical use of AI tools are crucial, especially when presenting ideas in academic work. 2. In response to this emerging technology usage and to ensure the authenticity of the student’s intellectual contribution to the thesis, this document provides a guideline for Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) Postgraduate Program’s for handling thesis and viva-voce sessions. 3. UPM is expected to provide a thorough oversight and ensure the responsible incorporation of generative AI in research and viva sessions. For programs involving professional bodies, it is subject to regulation by the relevant professional bodies.

采集日期: · 行号: 1–22

存档哈希: 48a07a190e5bc3a2aeaef2fb249c5b12601f627daeb836d50f94608d450cf6bd

使用披露

AI 明示条款

本站解读 · 官方原文见下方

The thesis guideline requires students to explain where/why AI was used and distinguish affected work from their own contributions. The bilingual declaration records purpose, chapters/pages and sources and affirms AI assistance rather than replacement with human review for accuracy.

记录的适用范围
学生 · program · UPM postgraduate thesis and viva voce · Professional-body programme regulations also apply; not university-wide undergraduate assessment rule
记录的主题
使用披露
记录的约束程度
mandatory
官方来源与存档引文
官方来源与存档引文 ↗
7. Students MUST: a) demonstrate that the intellectual contributions of the thesis are predominantly their own, despite AI assistance b) ensure the accuracy of facts and claims in the thesis, supported by appropriate evidence and references c) ensure the originality of the content in their thesis d) demonstrate a comprehensive understanding and mastery of their research contributions e) demonstrate that he/she can maintain control over his/her research process, and AI was used as a supporting tool f) explain clearly and attribute appropriately where and why generative AI was used (e.g., literature review, data preprocessing, or creative simulations) g) outline the areas of the research that were influenced by AI-generated content versus their direct contribution h) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models

采集日期: · 行号: 45–59

存档哈希: 48a07a190e5bc3a2aeaef2fb249c5b12601f627daeb836d50f94608d450cf6bd

边界与疑虑

AI 明示条款

本站解读 · 官方原文见下方

Postgraduate thesis students MUST demonstrate predominantly their own intellectual contribution, factual accuracy, originality, mastery and control of the research process. AI must assist rather than replace that contribution. The guideline does not provide a captured disciplinary tariff.

记录的适用范围
学生 · program · UPM postgraduate thesis and viva voce · Professional-body programme regulations also apply; not university-wide undergraduate assessment rule
记录的主题
边界与疑虑
记录的约束程度
mandatory
官方来源与存档引文
官方来源与存档引文 ↗
7. Students MUST: a) demonstrate that the intellectual contributions of the thesis are predominantly their own, despite AI assistance b) ensure the accuracy of facts and claims in the thesis, supported by appropriate evidence and references c) ensure the originality of the content in their thesis d) demonstrate a comprehensive understanding and mastery of their research contributions e) demonstrate that he/she can maintain control over his/her research process, and AI was used as a supporting tool f) explain clearly and attribute appropriately where and why generative AI was used (e.g., literature review, data preprocessing, or creative simulations) g) outline the areas of the research that were influenced by AI-generated content versus their direct contribution h) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models

采集日期: · 行号: 45–59

存档哈希: 48a07a190e5bc3a2aeaef2fb249c5b12601f627daeb836d50f94608d450cf6bd

调查与回应

AI 明示条款

本站解读 · 官方原文见下方

Examiners must evaluate originality and critical use/verification of AI output. The viva chair must ensure the AI-declaration areas and originality of the students contribution are examined. These are thesis/viva examination requirements, not a separately captured misconduct investigation procedure.

记录的适用范围
学生 · program · UPM postgraduate thesis and viva voce · Professional-body programme regulations also apply; not university-wide undergraduate assessment rule
记录的主题
调查与回应
记录的约束程度
mandatory
官方来源与存档引文
官方来源与存档引文 ↗
8. Examiners are reminded to assess the student's writing style, the depth of knowledge in the discipline, and the originality of their contributions. Examiners MUST ensure that: a) answer the research context in terms of clarity of the problem statement, literature review, methodology adequacy b) maintain control over his/her research process, and AI was used as a supporting tool c) use AI as a tool to assist, not substitute, their research efforts and intellectual contributions d) defend their work and achieve the novelty of the scope of the degree that the students attended e) critically evaluate and verify the AI-generated outputs (e.g., factual accuracy, relevance, bias in generated text or data) f) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models 9. The Chairman must ensure that the student declares during the viva session the use of AI in the research, clearly specifying the areas it assisted with, while affirming that the originality and novelty of the research are their own work.

采集日期: · 行号: 61–75

存档哈希: 48a07a190e5bc3a2aeaef2fb249c5b12601f627daeb836d50f94608d450cf6bd

Reviewed record

已审核条款

5 条已审核条款

学术诚信2 条已审核条款

Academic Integrity

UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline says postgraduate students must demonstrate that thesis intellectual contributions are predominantly their own despite AI assistance, and must ensure accuracy, references, originality, mastery, and control over the research process.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: postgraduate_thesis_students_must_demonstrate_own_contribution_despite_ai_assistance

原始证据

证据 1
Students MUST: a) demonstrate that the intellectual contributions of the thesis are predominantly their own, despite AI assistance b) ensure the accuracy of facts and claims in the thesis, supported by appropriate evidence and references c) ensure the originality of the content in their thesis d) demonstrate a comprehensive understanding and mastery of their research contributions e) demonstrate that he/she can maintain control over his/her research process, and AI was used as a supporting tool

Academic Integrity

For UPM postgraduate viva sessions, the guideline says the chairperson must ensure that the student declares AI use in the research, specifies the areas assisted, and affirms that the originality and novelty of the research are the student's own work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: postgraduate_viva_requires_student_ai_use_declaration

原始证据

证据 1
The Chairman must ensure that the student declares during the viva session the use of AI in the research, clearly specifying the areas it assisted with, while affirming that the originality and novelty of the research are their own work.
隐私1 条已审核条款

隐私

UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline requires students, and reminds examiners to ensure, ethical handling of any data used in research or when interacting with generative AI models.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%

标准化值: postgraduate_thesis_generai_requires_ethical_data_handling

原始证据

证据 1
Students MUST: h) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models ... Examiners MUST ensure that: f) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models
AI 工具使用规则2 条已审核条款

Ai Tool Treatment

For postgraduate theses, UPM's generative AI guideline requires students to clearly explain and appropriately attribute where and why generative AI was used, and to identify areas influenced by AI-generated content versus the student's direct contribution.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: postgraduate_thesis_ai_use_requires_explanation_attribution_and_ai_influence_mapping

原始证据

证据 1
Students MUST: f) explain clearly and attribute appropriately where and why generative AI was used (e.g., literature review, data preprocessing, or creative simulations) g) outline the areas of the research that were influenced by AI-generated content versus their direct contribution

Ai Tool Treatment

UPM's postgraduate thesis AI declaration form has students declare that AI technology used in thesis writing served as an assistive writing tool rather than a substitute for original thinking, analysis, or research, and that generated content was reviewed and modified.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: postgraduate_thesis_ai_declaration_form_requires_assistive_tool_and_review_declaration

原始证据

证据 1
I, [student's name], hereby declare that) a) The artificial intelligence technology used serves as an assistive writing tool, not a substitute for my original thinking, analysis, or research). b) All content generated has been reviewed and modified to ensure authenticity and relevance to my study).

本地化显示 only

Student declaration form: AI use is declared as an assistive writing tool, not a substitute for original thinking, analysis, or research, and generated content is declared to have been reviewed and modified.

Source record

官方来源

1 个来源

展开官方来源列表
记录信息、JSON 与引用
审核AI 辅助审核置信度95%快照状态未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 14, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universiti-putra-malaysia

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志

Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.