Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Serdang, Malaysia
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: required.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) has 4 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: postgraduate_thesis_ai_use_requires_explanation_attribution_and_ai_influence_mapping
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students MUST: f) explain clearly and attribute appropriately where and why generative AI was used (e.g., literature review, data preprocessing, or creative simulations) g) outline the areas of the research that were influenced by AI-generated content versus their direct contribution
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: postgraduate_thesis_students_must_demonstrate_own_contribution_despite_ai_assistance
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students MUST: a) demonstrate that the intellectual contributions of the thesis are predominantly their own, despite AI assistance b) ensure the accuracy of facts and claims in the thesis, supported by appropriate evidence and references c) ensure the originality of the content in their thesis d) demonstrate a comprehensive understanding and mastery of their research contributions e) demonstrate that he/she can maintain control over his/her research process, and AI was used as a supporting tool
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: postgraduate_viva_requires_student_ai_use_declaration
Original evidence
Evidence 1The Chairman must ensure that the student declares during the viva session the use of AI in the research, clearly specifying the areas it assisted with, while affirming that the originality and novelty of the research are their own work.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: postgraduate_thesis_ai_declaration_form_requires_assistive_tool_and_review_declaration
Original evidence
Evidence 1I, [student's name], hereby declare that) a) The artificial intelligence technology used serves as an assistive writing tool, not a substitute for my original thinking, analysis, or research). b) All content generated has been reviewed and modified to ensure authenticity and relevance to my study).
Localized display only
Student declaration form: AI use is declared as an assistive writing tool, not a substitute for original thinking, analysis, or research, and generated content is declared to have been reviewed and modified.
Privacy
Normalized value: postgraduate_thesis_generai_requires_ethical_data_handling
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students MUST: h) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models ... Examiners MUST ensure that: f) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models
0 machine or needs-review claim
1 source attribution
sgs.upm.edu.my