Change log

Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Claims5Sources1Release records0

University page Public JSON Monthly report University index

Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

11 # Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: For postgraduate theses, UPM's generative AI guideline requires students to clearly explain and appropriately attribute where and why generative AI was used, and to identify areas influenced by AI-generated content versus the student's direct contribution.
3+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): Students MUST: f) explain clearly and attribute appropriately where and why generative AI was used (e.g., literature review, data preprocessing, or creative simulations) g) outline the areas of the research that were influenced by AI-generated content versus their direct contribution
4+academic_integrity: UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline says postgraduate students must demonstrate that thesis intellectual contributions are predominantly their own despite AI assistance, and must ensure accuracy, references, originality, mastery, and control over the research process.
5+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): Students MUST: a) demonstrate that the intellectual contributions of the thesis are predominantly their own, despite AI assistance b) ensure the accuracy of facts and claims in the thesis, supported by appropriate evidence and references c) ensure the originality of the content in their thesis d) demonstrate a comprehensive understanding and mastery of their research contributions e) demonstrate that he/she can maintain control over his/her research process, and AI was used as a supporting tool
6+academic_integrity: For UPM postgraduate viva sessions, the guideline says the chairperson must ensure that the student declares AI use in the research, specifies the areas assisted, and affirms that the originality and novelty of the research are the student's own work.
7+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): The Chairman must ensure that the student declares during the viva session the use of AI in the research, clearly specifying the areas it assisted with, while affirming that the originality and novelty of the research are their own work.
8+ai_tool_treatment: UPM's postgraduate thesis AI declaration form has students declare that AI technology used in thesis writing served as an assistive writing tool rather than a substitute for original thinking, analysis, or research, and that generated content was reviewed and modified.
9+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): I, [student's name], hereby declare that) a) The artificial intelligence technology used serves as an assistive writing tool, not a substitute for my original thinking, analysis, or research). b) All content generated has been reviewed and modified to ensure authenticity and relevance to my study).
10+privacy: UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline requires students, and reminds examiners to ensure, ethical handling of any data used in research or when interacting with generative AI models.
11+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): Students MUST: h) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models ... Examiners MUST ensure that: f) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

5 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

For postgraduate theses, UPM's generative AI guideline requires students to clearly explain and appropriately attribute where and why generative AI was used, and to identify areas influenced by AI-generated content versus the student's direct contribution.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline says postgraduate students must demonstrate that thesis intellectual contributions are predominantly their own despite AI assistance, and must ensure accuracy, references, originality, mastery, and control over the research process.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

For UPM postgraduate viva sessions, the guideline says the chairperson must ensure that the student declares AI use in the research, specifies the areas assisted, and affirms that the originality and novelty of the research are the student's own work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

UPM's postgraduate thesis AI declaration form has students declare that AI technology used in thesis writing served as an assistive writing tool rather than a substitute for original thinking, analysis, or research, and that generated content was reviewed and modified.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline requires students, and reminds examiners to ensure, ethical handling of any data used in research or when interacting with generative AI models.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

1 source attribution

Guideline for Managing Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage in Postgraduate Thesis

official_pdf Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 1:55 PM

Source URL: https://sgs.upm.edu.my/upload/dokumen/20250305133105Borang_Generatif_AI.pdf
Snapshot hash: 5e7c08bf879d305ffc4742ccc2c6bc1b32b111d398e13c9b0ffff712241c10e1

Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)

Change summary

Diff categories

Combined release diff