University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

变更日志

Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

审核: 智能体已审核最后检查时间2026年5月14日最后更改时间2026年5月14日声明5来源1版本记录0
大学页面公开 JSON月度报告大学索引

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月14日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: For postgraduate theses, UPM's generative AI guideline requires students to clearly explain and appropriately attribute where and why generative AI was used, and to identify areas influenced by AI-generated content versus the student's direct contribution.
3+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): Students MUST: f) explain clearly and attribute appropriately where and why generative AI was used (e.g., literature review, data preprocessing, or creative simulations) g) outline the areas of the research that were influenced by AI-generated content versus their direct contribution
4+academic_integrity: UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline says postgraduate students must demonstrate that thesis intellectual contributions are predominantly their own despite AI assistance, and must ensure accuracy, references, originality, mastery, and control over the research process.
5+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): Students MUST: a) demonstrate that the intellectual contributions of the thesis are predominantly their own, despite AI assistance b) ensure the accuracy of facts and claims in the thesis, supported by appropriate evidence and references c) ensure the originality of the content in their thesis d) demonstrate a comprehensive understanding and mastery of their research contributions e) demonstrate that he/she can maintain control over his/her research process, and AI was used as a supporting tool
6+academic_integrity: For UPM postgraduate viva sessions, the guideline says the chairperson must ensure that the student declares AI use in the research, specifies the areas assisted, and affirms that the originality and novelty of the research are the student's own work.
7+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): The Chairman must ensure that the student declares during the viva session the use of AI in the research, clearly specifying the areas it assisted with, while affirming that the originality and novelty of the research are their own work.
8+ai_tool_treatment: UPM's postgraduate thesis AI declaration form has students declare that AI technology used in thesis writing served as an assistive writing tool rather than a substitute for original thinking, analysis, or research, and that generated content was reviewed and modified.
9+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): I, [student's name], hereby declare that) a) The artificial intelligence technology used serves as an assistive writing tool, not a substitute for my original thinking, analysis, or research). b) All content generated has been reviewed and modified to ensure authenticity and relevance to my study).
10+privacy: UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline requires students, and reminds examiners to ensure, ethical handling of any data used in research or when interacting with generative AI models.
11+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): Students MUST: h) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models ... Examiners MUST ensure that: f) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

5 声明 条记录

ai_tool_treatment

For postgraduate theses, UPM's generative AI guideline requires students to clearly explain and appropriately attribute where and why generative AI was used, and to identify areas influenced by AI-generated content versus the student's direct contribution.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline says postgraduate students must demonstrate that thesis intellectual contributions are predominantly their own despite AI assistance, and must ensure accuracy, references, originality, mastery, and control over the research process.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

For UPM postgraduate viva sessions, the guideline says the chairperson must ensure that the student declares AI use in the research, specifies the areas assisted, and affirms that the originality and novelty of the research are the student's own work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据1语言en

ai_tool_treatment

UPM's postgraduate thesis AI declaration form has students declare that AI technology used in thesis writing served as an assistive writing tool rather than a substitute for original thinking, analysis, or research, and that generated content was reviewed and modified.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据1语言en

privacy

UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline requires students, and reminds examiners to ensure, ethical handling of any data used in research or when interacting with generative AI models.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%证据1语言en

源快照

1 来源归属