Registro de cambios

Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteÚltima verificación14 may 2026Último cambio14 may 2026Afirmaciones5Fuentes1Registros de versiones0

Página universitaria JSON público Informe mensual Índice universitario

Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: 14 may 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.

Aún no se han registrado filas de diferencias de políticas entre versiones para esta universidad. La página sigue rastreando afirmaciones respaldadas por fuentes actuales, atribuciones de fuentes oficiales, estado de revisión, actualidad de las fuentes y JSON públicas para su descubrimiento y citación.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.

Texto de la política0Extraído recientemente0Evidencia0Instantáneas de origen0Texto de origen0Fuente añadida0Fuente eliminada0

11 # Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: For postgraduate theses, UPM's generative AI guideline requires students to clearly explain and appropriately attribute where and why generative AI was used, and to identify areas influenced by AI-generated content versus the student's direct contribution.
3+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): Students MUST: f) explain clearly and attribute appropriately where and why generative AI was used (e.g., literature review, data preprocessing, or creative simulations) g) outline the areas of the research that were influenced by AI-generated content versus their direct contribution
4+academic_integrity: UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline says postgraduate students must demonstrate that thesis intellectual contributions are predominantly their own despite AI assistance, and must ensure accuracy, references, originality, mastery, and control over the research process.
5+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): Students MUST: a) demonstrate that the intellectual contributions of the thesis are predominantly their own, despite AI assistance b) ensure the accuracy of facts and claims in the thesis, supported by appropriate evidence and references c) ensure the originality of the content in their thesis d) demonstrate a comprehensive understanding and mastery of their research contributions e) demonstrate that he/she can maintain control over his/her research process, and AI was used as a supporting tool
6+academic_integrity: For UPM postgraduate viva sessions, the guideline says the chairperson must ensure that the student declares AI use in the research, specifies the areas assisted, and affirms that the originality and novelty of the research are the student's own work.
7+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): The Chairman must ensure that the student declares during the viva session the use of AI in the research, clearly specifying the areas it assisted with, while affirming that the originality and novelty of the research are their own work.
8+ai_tool_treatment: UPM's postgraduate thesis AI declaration form has students declare that AI technology used in thesis writing served as an assistive writing tool rather than a substitute for original thinking, analysis, or research, and that generated content was reviewed and modified.
9+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): I, [student's name], hereby declare that) a) The artificial intelligence technology used serves as an assistive writing tool, not a substitute for my original thinking, analysis, or research). b) All content generated has been reviewed and modified to ensure authenticity and relevance to my study).
10+privacy: UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline requires students, and reminds examiners to ensure, ethical handling of any data used in research or when interacting with generative AI models.
11+Evidence (en, 5e7c08bf879d): Students MUST: h) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models ... Examiners MUST ensure that: f) ensure ethical handling of any data used in research or interacting with generative AI models

Historial de versiones

0 public release diffs

Cambios en las afirmaciones

5 Afirmación registros

ai_tool_treatment

For postgraduate theses, UPM's generative AI guideline requires students to clearly explain and appropriately attribute where and why generative AI was used, and to identify areas influenced by AI-generated content versus the student's direct contribution.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%Evidencia1Idiomasen

academic_integrity

UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline says postgraduate students must demonstrate that thesis intellectual contributions are predominantly their own despite AI assistance, and must ensure accuracy, references, originality, mastery, and control over the research process.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia1Idiomasen

academic_integrity

For UPM postgraduate viva sessions, the guideline says the chairperson must ensure that the student declares AI use in the research, specifies the areas assisted, and affirms that the originality and novelty of the research are the student's own work.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia1Idiomasen

ai_tool_treatment

UPM's postgraduate thesis AI declaration form has students declare that AI technology used in thesis writing served as an assistive writing tool rather than a substitute for original thinking, analysis, or research, and that generated content was reviewed and modified.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%Evidencia1Idiomasen

privacy

UPM's postgraduate thesis generative AI guideline requires students, and reminds examiners to ensure, ethical handling of any data used in research or when interacting with generative AI models.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza91%Evidencia1Idiomasen

Instantáneas de origen

1 atribución de la fuente

Guideline for Managing Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage in Postgraduate Thesis

official_pdf Tracker checked at 14 may 2026, 13:55

URL de origen: https://sgs.upm.edu.my/upload/dokumen/20250305133105Borang_Generatif_AI.pdf
Hash de instantánea: 5e7c08bf879d305ffc4742ccc2c6bc1b32b111d398e13c9b0ffff712241c10e1

Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)

Resumen de cambios

Categorías de diferencias

Diferencias de versión combinadas