University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Tulsa, United States

University of Tulsa

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: 1001-1200Updated2026年5月25日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

4 reviewed claims

Source Status

University of Tulsa's official McFarlin Library Generative AI guide states that it is educational guidance and does not represent generative-AI use policies for the entire university.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: official library guide; not university-wide policy

最后检查时间
2026年5月25日
最后更改时间
2026年5月25日

原始证据

证据 1
Information contained on this website is educational in nature and does not represent the generative-AI use policies for the entirety of The University of Tulsa.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
b303dfb9…
已检索
2026年5月25日
证据定位器
Disclaimer

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Tulsa's McFarlin Library Generative AI guide says the university encourages Microsoft's Copilot LLM and describes TU SSO access as an enterprise-protected Copilot experience included with the TU Office Suite.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: Copilot encouraged; TU SSO enterprise protection described

最后检查时间
2026年5月25日
最后更改时间
2026年5月25日

原始证据

证据 1
The University of Tulsa encourages the use of Microsoft's Copilot LLM. When you use your TU SSO credentials to login to Copilot, you are accessing an enterprise-protected version of Copilot.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
a5b80810…
已检索
2026年5月25日
证据定位器
Choosing Tools and Creating Prompts

Academic Integrity

University of Tulsa's McFarlin Library Generative AI guide points students to AI citation guidance, explains why disclosure is encouraged, and says best practice is to check with the professor before using generative-AI tools.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度89%

标准化值: citation/disclosure guidance; check with professor

最后检查时间
2026年5月25日
最后更改时间
2026年5月25日

原始证据

证据 1
Professors may require less or more specific notes about your generative-AI use for course work. Best practice is to always check with your professor before using any generative-AI tools.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
d2e9e4f0…
已检索
2026年5月25日
证据定位器
Example Disclosure Statements

教学

University of Tulsa's McFarlin Library Generative AI guide advises users that they remain responsible for fact checking AI outputs and frames coursework use with a tutor-comparison question before using generative AI.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%

标准化值: fact-check responsibility and tutor-comparison coursework caution

最后检查时间
2026年5月25日
最后更改时间
2026年5月25日

原始证据

证据 1
Regardless of the tool you choose, you need to write prompts that are CLEAR, and remember it is still your responsibility to fact check any information.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
a5b80810…
已检索
2026年5月25日
证据定位器
Choosing Tools and Creating Prompts

Source record

官方来源

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度93%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Tulsa AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 25, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-tulsa

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志