University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Munich, Germany

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: =58Updated2026年7月19日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

7 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"Microsoft Copilot through the LMU Microsoft 365 access for employees.","howToObtain":"LMU employees activate an LMU Microsoft account and use the University M365 access.","costToUser":"Included in the applicable LMU M365 licence; no separate price specified.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

最后检查时间
2026年7月15日
最后更改时间
2026年7月15日

原始证据

证据 1
LMU's official teaching event states that LMU employees can use Microsoft Copilot through the University Microsoft 365 access.

本地化显示 only

LMU's official teaching event states that LMU employees can use Microsoft Copilot through the University Microsoft 365 access.

来源语言
de
快照哈希
1cc3e1b5…
已检索
2026年7月15日

原始证据

证据 2
LMU IT says employees receive Microsoft 365 licences through the LMU campus contract and can activate their LMU Microsoft account to sign into licensed programs and services.

本地化显示 only

LMU IT says employees receive Microsoft 365 licences through the LMU campus contract and can activate their LMU Microsoft account to sign into licensed programs and services.

来源语言
de
快照哈希
1cc3e1b5…
已检索
2026年7月15日

Ai Tool Treatment

LMU IfKW student guidance says AI may be used in assessments only with explicit teacher permission; if no explicit permission is given, students must assume AI use is not allowed.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: Assessment AI use requires explicit teacher permission in the IfKW guidance

最后检查时间
2026年5月12日
最后更改时间
2026年5月12日

原始证据

证据 1
Therefore, in general terms, the use of AI may be allowed in assessments only with the explicit permission of the teacher. If no explicit permission is given, then the students must assume the use of AI is not allowed.

本地化显示 only

IfKW assessment guidance requires explicit teacher permission for AI use.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
a82c2400…
已检索
2026年5月12日
证据定位器
Section: Whether use of AI is permitted for assessed work

隐私

LMU IfKW guidance says material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU data-protection standards are met.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: Personal information requires consent and German/EU data-protection compliance before AI upload

最后检查时间
2026年5月12日
最后更改时间
2026年5月12日

原始证据

证据 1
Material containing personal information must not be entered into AI systems without consent and unless German or EU standards of data protection are met. Providers of LLMs may reside in countries where rules of data protection do not follow the same standards as in Germany or the EU.

本地化显示 only

IfKW guidance restricts uploading personal information to AI systems without consent and data-protection compliance.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
a82c2400…
已检索
2026年5月12日
证据定位器
Section: The uploading of material to AI systems

Academic Integrity

LMU IfKW guidance treats verbatim or minimally changed AI-generated text without proper attribution as plagiarism, and says significant unattributed AI-generated text in assessed work can receive grade 5 (failed).

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: Unattributed AI-generated text is treated as plagiarism in the IfKW guidance

最后检查时间
2026年5月12日
最后更改时间
2026年5月12日

原始证据

证据 1
To include AI-generated text verbatim — or with small changes — into one’s texts without proper attribution constitutes plagiarism comparable to the use of text written by others without citing the source. If it can be established that a student has submitted work that includes a significant amount AI-generated text without proper attribution (see below), the corresponding assessment will be evaluated with the grade 5 (failed).

本地化显示 only

IfKW guidance treats unattributed AI-generated text as plagiarism and says significant cases can fail.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
a82c2400…
已检索
2026年5月12日
证据定位器
Section: The use of AI as (comparable to) plagiarism

研究

LMU Medical Faculty dissertation guidance says doctoral authors must disclose when, where, and to what extent AI was used, name AI as an aid in the affidavit, and mark sections where AI was used for creation or editing.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: Medical Faculty GWP page requires disclosure and marking of AI use in dissertations

最后检查时间
2026年5月12日
最后更改时间
2026年5月12日

原始证据

证据 1
Geben Sie an, wann, wo und in welchem Umfang Sie KI im Rahmen Ihrer Dissertation genutzt haben! In Ihrer eidesstattlichen Versicherung (Affidavit) erklären Sie, dass Sie Ihre Dissertation selbständig verfasst haben und alle verwendeten Hilfsmittel benannt haben. KI ist ein solches Hilfsmittel und muss daher benannt werden. Machen Sie Abschnitte in denen Sie KI beim Erstellen oder Editieren genutzt haben kenntlich.

本地化显示 only

Medical Faculty GWP guidance requires disclosure of AI use in dissertations.

来源语言
de
快照哈希
99c44e19…
已检索
2026年5月12日
证据定位器
Section: Umgang und Nutzung von künstlicher Intelligenz

Academic Integrity

LMU IfKW guidance says permitted AI use in assessed work, including preliminary tasks, must be completely and appropriately documented.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: Permitted AI use must be documented in assessed work under IfKW guidance

最后检查时间
2026年5月12日
最后更改时间
2026年5月12日

原始证据

证据 1
The use of AI (if permitted) in assessed work, including for preliminary tasks, must be completely and appropriately documented. In addition, students should document: How the tool was used in their work (e.g., generation of stimuli, translation, summary of previous research, formulation of research questions etc), the prompt, and if required by the teacher, the original output.

本地化显示 only

IfKW guidance requires documentation of permitted AI use, including tool use and prompts.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
a82c2400…
已检索
2026年5月12日
证据定位器
Section: The attribution of the use of AI

教学

LMU teaching guidance recommends adapting e-exam questions for ChatGPT-era assessment, including tasks that require critical reflection on ChatGPT limitations rather than simple knowledge or comprehension questions.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%

标准化值: Teaching handout recommends adapting e-exam question formats around ChatGPT limitations

最后检查时间
2026年5月12日
最后更改时间
2026年5月12日

原始证据

证据 1
Bei E-Klausuren gelten folgende Empfehlungen: Stellen Sie andere Aufgaben als vor der Einführung von ChatGPT. Sie müssen davon ausgehen, dass ChatGPT zum Einsatz kommen könnte. Es wäre deshalb sinnvoll, dass Sie Aufgaben stellen, bei denen Studierende die Limitationen von ChatGPT kritisch reflektieren müssen. Einfache Wissens- und Verständnisfragen sind unter Einsatz von KI nicht sinnvoll.

本地化显示 only

LMU teaching guidance recommends adapting e-exam questions and avoiding simple knowledge questions when AI may be used.

来源语言
de
快照哈希
e572e056…
已检索
2026年5月12日
证据定位器
Kapitel 5.4 Umgang mit ChatGPT bei E-Klausuren

Source record

官方来源

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/ludwig-maximilians-universitat-munchen

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志