Naples, Italy

University of Naples - Federico II

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage9 reviewedEvidence-backed claims9Reviewed9Candidate0Official sources3Source languageitPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-naples-federico-ii.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence81%

AI disclosure

University of Naples - Federico II has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

AI tools

Derived tool records5

ChatGPT Edu

University of Naples - Federico II

Tool
ChatGPT Edu
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Allowed
Review
Agent reviewed
Sources

ChatGPT Edu / ChatGPT Enterprise

University of Naples - Federico II

Tool
ChatGPT Edu / ChatGPT Enterprise
About
ChatGPT Edu and ChatGPT Enterprise listed among the university's institutional AI systems.
Access
Use is limited to institutional, teaching, research, and administrative purposes under university arrangements.
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Allowed
Review
Agent reviewed
Sources

Microsoft Copilot

University of Naples - Federico II

Tool
Microsoft Copilot
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Allowed
Review
Agent reviewed

Microsoft Copilot (Copilot 365 e Copilot Studio)

University of Naples - Federico II

Tool
Microsoft Copilot (Copilot 365 e Copilot Studio)
About
Microsoft Copilot products listed among the university's institutional AI systems.
Access
Use is limited to institutional, teaching, research, and administrative purposes under university arrangements.
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Allowed
Review
Agent reviewed
Sources

OpenAI ChatGPT

University of Naples - Federico II

Tool
OpenAI ChatGPT
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Allowed
Review
Agent reviewed
Sources

Evidence-backed claims

9 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Ai Tool Treatment

ChatGPT Edu / ChatGPT Enterprise is listed for University of Naples - Federico II in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"chatgpt","rawToolName":"ChatGPT Edu / ChatGPT Enterprise","description":"ChatGPT Edu and ChatGPT Enterprise listed among the university's institutional AI systems.","howToObtain":"Use is limited to institutional, teaching, research, and administrative purposes under university arrangements.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

原始证据

Evidence 1
Le linee guida dell'Ateneo elencano OpenAI – ChatGPT Edu / ChatGPT Enterprise, fornito tramite contratto quadro CRUI, tra i sistemi di intelligenza artificiale in dotazione all'Ateneo per finalità istituzionali, didattiche, di ricerca e amministrative.

本地化显示 only

Le linee guida dell'Ateneo elencano OpenAI – ChatGPT Edu / ChatGPT Enterprise, fornito tramite contratto quadro CRUI, tra i sistemi di intelligenza artificiale in dotazione all'Ateneo per finalità istituzionali, didattiche, di ricerca e amministrative.

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot (Copilot 365 e Copilot Studio) is listed for University of Naples - Federico II in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot (Copilot 365 e Copilot Studio)","description":"Microsoft Copilot products listed among the university's institutional AI systems.","howToObtain":"Use is limited to institutional, teaching, research, and administrative purposes under university arrangements.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

原始证据

Evidence 1
Le linee guida dell'Ateneo elencano Microsoft Copilot (Copilot 365 e Copilot Studio), integrato nelle piattaforme Microsoft 365 in uso presso l'Ateneo e fornito in base al contratto quadro CRUI–Microsoft.

本地化显示 only

Le linee guida dell'Ateneo elencano Microsoft Copilot (Copilot 365 e Copilot Studio), integrato nelle piattaforme Microsoft 365 in uso presso l'Ateneo e fornito in base al contratto quadro CRUI–Microsoft.

Source Status

University of Naples Federico II has published university-wide first guidelines for use of artificial intelligence systems inside the university, approved by the Academic Senate after a favorable Board of Directors opinion.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: university_wide_ai_guidelines_approved

原始证据

Evidence 1
con delibera n. 31 del 26.11.2025, sono state approvate dal Senato Accademico, previo parere favorevole del Consiglio di Amministrazione, espresso in pari data con delibera n. 86, le Prime linee guida per l'utilizzo dei Sistemi di Intelligenza Artificiale

本地化显示 only

The Academic Senate approved the first AI guidelines after a favorable Board of Directors opinion.

Teaching

For teaching staff and similar roles, the guidelines allow AI as support for teaching preparation and content or exercise generation with human supervision and labeling, but prohibit using AI to perform evaluations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: teaching_support_allowed_ai_evaluation_prohibited

原始证据

Evidence 1
Si può utilizzare l'IA a supporto della didattica, per la preparazione e l'erogazione di contenuti didattici e per la generazione di esercizi, domande, questionari, con l'obbligo di supervisione umana dell'output e delle fonti, nonché di etichettatura del materiale generato. È vietato l'impiego dell'IA per effettuare valutazioni.

本地化显示 only

AI may support teaching materials and exercises with human supervision and labeling; use of AI to perform evaluations is prohibited.

Academic Integrity

For students and similar figures, the guidelines say AI may be used only as support for study and learning, and AI-generated content for assessments or theses is not permitted without explicit declaration and authorization from the responsible teacher.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: student_ai_use_requires_disclosure_and_teacher_authorization_for_assessment_or_thesis

原始证据

Evidence 1
Per gli studenti, l'IA può essere esclusivamente uno strumento di supporto allo studio e all'apprendimento... non è consentito ricorrere alla IA per generare qualsiasi contenuto destinato a prove di valutazione o tesi senza dichiarazione esplicita e senza l'autorizzazione del docente responsabile.

本地化显示 only

Students may use AI only as support for study and learning; AI-generated assessment or thesis content requires explicit declaration and teacher authorization.

Privacy

The guidelines state that AI systems used within the university must include contractual guarantees that user-provided data are not used to train LLMs except with specific authorization, and they prohibit entering special categories of personal data in prompts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: llm_training_guardrail_and_sensitive_data_prompt_ban

原始证据

Evidence 1
I sistemi di intelligenza artificiale utilizzabili all'interno dell'Ateneo devono prevedere, nel relativo contratto o accordo di fornitura, la garanzia esplicita che i dati forniti dagli utenti non vengano utilizzati per l'addestramento dei modelli linguistici (LLM), salvo specifiche e puntuali autorizzazioni da parte del CSI e del DPO di Ateneo.

本地化显示 only

Contracts or supply agreements must guarantee that user-provided data are not used to train LLMs unless specifically authorized by CSI and the university DPO.

Research

For research, the guidelines say AI can support research activities, but researchers remain fully responsible for originality, content, methodological quality, accuracy, ethics, and integrity, and an AI system cannot be considered an author or co-author of scientific publications.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: researcher_responsibility_and_no_ai_authorship

原始证据

Evidence 1
resta piena responsabilità dei ricercatori garantire che l'utilizzo della IA sia coerente con i principi di integrità scientifica della ricerca... Un sistema di intelligenza artificiale non può essere considerato autore o coautore di pubblicazioni scientifiche.

本地化显示 only

Researchers remain responsible for integrity and quality; an AI system cannot be considered an author or co-author of scientific publications.

Ai Tool Treatment

The guidelines list OpenAI ChatGPT Edu/Enterprise, Microsoft Copilot, and other CSI-approved tools under CRUI framework agreements as AI systems available to the university.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: crui_authorized_ai_systems_listed

原始证据

Evidence 1
L'Ateneo dispone dei seguenti sistemi di intelligenza artificiale autorizzati e gestiti secondo gli accordi CRUI in vigore: OpenAI - ChatGPT Edu / ChatGPT Enterprise; Microsoft Copilot; Eventuali altri strumenti di IA generativa o assistiva approvati dal CSI

本地化显示 only

The guidelines list ChatGPT Edu/Enterprise, Microsoft Copilot, and other CSI-approved AI tools under CRUI agreements.

Other

The guidelines state that each user is responsible for correct AI-tool use in their area of competence and that failure to comply with the guidelines is a violation of behavioral obligations subject to disciplinary responsibility under applicable role-specific rules.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: ai_use_responsibility_and_disciplinary_consequence

原始证据

Evidence 1
La responsabilità circa il corretto utilizzo degli strumenti di IA all'interno dell'Ateneo è in capo a ciascun utente, per gli ambiti di rispettiva competenza... Il mancato rispetto di quanto previsto dalle presenti linee guida rappresenta una violazione degli obblighi di comportamento ed è soggetto... a responsabilità disciplinare

本地化显示 only

Each user is responsible for correct AI-tool use; non-compliance with the guidelines is subject to disciplinary responsibility under applicable rules.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedJul 16, 2026Last changedJul 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities