Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Naples - Federico II currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
7 claim records
University of Naples Federico II has published university-wide first guidelines for use of artificial intelligence systems inside the university, approved by the Academic Senate after a favorable Board of Directors opinion.
For teaching staff and similar roles, the guidelines allow AI as support for teaching preparation and content or exercise generation with human supervision and labeling, but prohibit using AI to perform evaluations.
For students and similar figures, the guidelines say AI may be used only as support for study and learning, and AI-generated content for assessments or theses is not permitted without explicit declaration and authorization from the responsible teacher.
The guidelines state that AI systems used within the university must include contractual guarantees that user-provided data are not used to train LLMs except with specific authorization, and they prohibit entering special categories of personal data in prompts.
For research, the guidelines say AI can support research activities, but researchers remain fully responsible for originality, content, methodological quality, accuracy, ethics, and integrity, and an AI system cannot be considered an author or co-author of scientific publications.
The guidelines list OpenAI ChatGPT Edu/Enterprise, Microsoft Copilot, and other CSI-approved tools under CRUI framework agreements as AI systems available to the university.
The guidelines state that each user is responsible for correct AI-tool use in their area of competence and that failure to comply with the guidelines is a violation of behavioral obligations subject to disciplinary responsibility under applicable role-specific rules.
2 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 3:16 PM
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 3:17 PM