University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Ramadi, Iraq

University of Anbar

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: 1001-1200Updated2026年5月23日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

4 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

The University of Anbar Journal of Languages and Literature requires authors to explicitly disclose AI-tool use in the Acknowledgment or Methodology section, including the tool, version, and purpose.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: journal_scoped_ai_use_disclosure_required

最后检查时间
2026年5月23日
最后更改时间
2026年5月23日

原始证据

证据 1
Authors must explicitly disclose any use of AI tools in the Acknowledgment or Methodology section, specifying the tool, version, and purpose of use (e.g., ChatGPT 5, Grammarly, etc.).

本地化显示 only

AUJLL requires explicit AI-use disclosure in the Acknowledgment or Methodology section, including tool, version, and purpose.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
0c0c2217…
已检索
2026年5月23日
证据定位器
Second: Disclosure and Transparency

研究

The Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences prohibits AI use for generating scientific content without human verification, fabricating or manipulating data, obscuring authorship responsibility, or listing AI tools as co-authors.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: journal_scoped_ai_prohibited_uses

最后检查时间
2026年5月23日
最后更改时间
2026年5月23日

原始证据

证据 1
The following uses are strictly prohibited: Generating scientific content (results, discussion, conclusions) without human verification; Fabrication or manipulation of data using AI; Use of AI in a way that obscures authorship responsibility; Listing AI tools as co-authors.

本地化显示 only

AJAS prohibits AI-generated scientific content without human verification, AI data fabrication or manipulation, obscured authorship responsibility, and listing AI as co-author.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
c453f5f5…
已检索
2026年5月23日
证据定位器
3. Prohibited Use of AI

研究

The University of Anbar Journal of Languages and Literature permits reliable AI tools only for supportive purposes such as proofreading, formatting, and scientifically verifiable linguistic or textual analysis.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%

标准化值: journal_scoped_ai_supportive_use_only

最后检查时间
2026年5月23日
最后更改时间
2026年5月23日

原始证据

证据 1
Researchers are permitted to use reliable AI tools for supportive purposes only, such as: Language proofreading and stylistic enhancement; Reference organization or text formatting; Analyzing linguistic or textual data in a scientifically verifiable and interpretable manner.

本地化显示 only

AUJLL allows reliable AI tools only for supportive uses such as proofreading, formatting, and verifiable textual or linguistic analysis.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
0c0c2217…
已检索
2026年5月23日
证据定位器
First: Use of AI Tools

Academic Integrity

The Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences requires manuscript AI-use disclosure at submission and bars reviewers from using AI tools to generate review reports while stating that editors must not rely on AI for editorial decisions.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: journal_scoped_ai_disclosure_and_review_controls

最后检查时间
2026年5月23日
最后更改时间
2026年5月23日

原始证据

证据 1
Authors must disclose AI usage at submission. A statement must be included in the manuscript under a section titled: "AI Usage Disclosure" ... Reviewers: Must NOT use AI tools to generate review reports ... Editors: Must not rely on AI for editorial decisions.

本地化显示 only

AJAS requires AI-use disclosure at submission, prohibits reviewers from using AI to generate reviews, and says editors must not rely on AI for editorial decisions.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
c453f5f5…
已检索
2026年5月23日
证据定位器
4. Mandatory Disclosure and 5. Responsibilities

Source record

官方来源

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度93%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Anbar AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 23, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-anbar

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志