Ramadi, Iraq

University of Anbar

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources2Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-anbar.json

Policy profile

Coverage score50/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

Policy presence

No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

The University of Anbar Journal of Languages and Literature requires authors to explicitly disclose AI-tool use in the Acknowledgment or Methodology section, including the tool, version, and purpose.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: journal_scoped_ai_use_disclosure_required

Evidence originale

Evidence 1
Authors must explicitly disclose any use of AI tools in the Acknowledgment or Methodology section, specifying the tool, version, and purpose of use (e.g., ChatGPT 5, Grammarly, etc.).

Affichage localise only

AUJLL requires explicit AI-use disclosure in the Acknowledgment or Methodology section, including tool, version, and purpose.

Research

The Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences prohibits AI use for generating scientific content without human verification, fabricating or manipulating data, obscuring authorship responsibility, or listing AI tools as co-authors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: journal_scoped_ai_prohibited_uses

Evidence originale

Evidence 1
The following uses are strictly prohibited: Generating scientific content (results, discussion, conclusions) without human verification; Fabrication or manipulation of data using AI; Use of AI in a way that obscures authorship responsibility; Listing AI tools as co-authors.

Affichage localise only

AJAS prohibits AI-generated scientific content without human verification, AI data fabrication or manipulation, obscured authorship responsibility, and listing AI as co-author.

Research

The University of Anbar Journal of Languages and Literature permits reliable AI tools only for supportive purposes such as proofreading, formatting, and scientifically verifiable linguistic or textual analysis.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: journal_scoped_ai_supportive_use_only

Evidence originale

Evidence 1
Researchers are permitted to use reliable AI tools for supportive purposes only, such as: Language proofreading and stylistic enhancement; Reference organization or text formatting; Analyzing linguistic or textual data in a scientifically verifiable and interpretable manner.

Affichage localise only

AUJLL allows reliable AI tools only for supportive uses such as proofreading, formatting, and verifiable textual or linguistic analysis.

Academic Integrity

The Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences requires manuscript AI-use disclosure at submission and bars reviewers from using AI tools to generate review reports while stating that editors must not rely on AI for editorial decisions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: journal_scoped_ai_disclosure_and_review_controls

Evidence originale

Evidence 1
Authors must disclose AI usage at submission. A statement must be included in the manuscript under a section titled: "AI Usage Disclosure" ... Reviewers: Must NOT use AI tools to generate review reports ... Editors: Must not rely on AI for editorial decisions.

Affichage localise only

AJAS requires AI-use disclosure at submission, prohibits reviewers from using AI to generate reviews, and says editors must not rely on AI for editorial decisions.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences - Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage and Disclosure Policy

ajas.uoanbar.edu.iq

Snapshot hash
c453f5f534ffd77ab58b3aaabb353ee05fe80e9673afb8070fd775b2bbe27401

Change log

Last checkedMay 23, 2026Last changedMay 23, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities