University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Limerick, Ireland

University of Limerick

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: =401Updated2026年5月16日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

6 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

University of Limerick assessment guidance states that use of AI in an unauthorized manner is a breach of academic integrity, and that use not permitted by the module leader is a breach of academic integrity.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: unauthorized_ai_use_breach_academic_integrity

最后检查时间
2026年5月16日
最后更改时间
2026年5月16日

原始证据

证据 1
The Academic Integrity Policy and the Procedures for Managing Allegations of Academic Misconduct, available on the UL Policy hub, indicate that it is a breach of academic integrity if AI is used in an unauthorised manner. In other words, it is the responsibility of the module leader/equivalent to decide and communicate the level of acceptable use of AI to students i.e. to determine what is authorised/unauthorised use.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
895db1df…
已检索
2026年5月16日
证据定位器
What is the University's position on the use of AI for teaching, learning and assessment activities?

Academic Integrity

University of Limerick guidance says GenAI use in assessment beyond the specifications of the module lead or programme lead is considered academic misconduct and related concerns should be managed under the procedures for academic misconduct allegations.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: genai_beyond_specifications_academic_misconduct

最后检查时间
2026年5月16日
最后更改时间
2026年5月16日

原始证据

证据 1
The use of Gen AI in assessment beyond the specifications of the module lead and/or programme lead is considered to be a form of academic misconduct, as described in the Academic Integrity Policy. Concerns relating to the unauthorised use of GenAI should be managed in accordance with the Procedures for Managing Allegations of Academic Misconduct.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
07c65bc2…
已检索
2026年5月16日
证据定位器
What is the protocol for managing breaches of the guidance given to students on the use of Gen AI in assessment?

Security Review

UL GenAI principles state that any tool used within the university must comply with UL data protection, IT security, and acceptable usage policies, and that cloud tools must be approved through the Cloud Governance process.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: university_tool_use_requires_policy_compliance_cloud_governance

最后检查时间
2026年5月16日
最后更改时间
2026年5月16日

原始证据

证据 1
The use of any tool within the University must be compliant with the UL Data Protection Policy, IT Security Policy, and the Acceptable Usage Policy. All tools being used within the University must go through the appropriate approval processes. Tools with a cloud aspect must be approved through the Cloud Governance process.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
9a0425f7…
已检索
2026年5月16日
证据定位器
UL Policies, Guidance and Resources

Ai Tool Treatment

UL student guidance says Microsoft Copilot accessed through UL staff or student accounts is currently the preferred GenAI platform from a security and data integrity standpoint when GenAI is used by staff or students.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: microsoft_copilot_preferred_platform

最后检查时间
2026年5月16日
最后更改时间
2026年5月16日

原始证据

证据 1
From a security and data integrity standpoint, if Gen AI is to be used by staff or students, the preferred platform is currently Microsoft Copilot, accessed through UL staff or student accounts. UL maintains a contractual agreement with Microsoft, a distinction not shared with other providers.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
7bbfcf4b…
已检索
2026年5月16日
证据定位器
What Gen AI tools can be used by students?

研究

UL guidance states that outputs from GenAI tools relied on for essential information, decision-making, or research must be independently verified.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: genai_outputs_must_be_independently_verified

最后检查时间
2026年5月16日
最后更改时间
2026年5月16日

原始证据

证据 1
As a result, all outputs from Gen AI tools which we rely on for essential information or which will inform decisions or influence research must be independently verified.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
3fb3c086…
已检索
2026年5月16日
证据定位器
Can the results of Gen AI prompts be trusted?

教学

University of Limerick guidance says legitimate AI use in academia is a local decision, with module coordinators, programme leads, or Heads of Department setting limits within module or programme design.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: module_programme_level_ai_use_limits

最后检查时间
2026年5月16日
最后更改时间
2026年5月16日

原始证据

证据 1
Given the variety of offerings, disciplines and courses, the question of legitimate use of AI within academia, will inevitably be a local decision. That is, a module coordinator, programme lead or Head of Department, will dictate the limits of legitimate uses of AI within module or programme design, in keeping with the module or programme aims and content.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
3fb3c086…
已检索
2026年5月16日
证据定位器
Is the use of Gen AI within academia legitimate?

Source record

官方来源

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Limerick AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-limerick

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志