Laramie, United States

University of Wyoming

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage6 reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources5Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-wyoming.json

Policy profile

Coverage score75/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence76%

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

University of Wyoming Regulation 2-114 says submissions generated in whole or in part by an Artificial Intelligence-based application without attribution to the application will be treated as plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: AI-generated submissions without attribution are treated as plagiarism

原始证据

Evidence 1
Submissions generated, in whole or in part, by an Artificial Intelligence-based application without attribution to the application will be treated as plagiarism; instructors, at all times, reserve the right to apply software to detect writing produced by Artificial Intelligence-based applications.

Academic Integrity

University of Wyoming Regulation 2-114 treats use of Artificial Intelligence-based applications as prohibited in cheating and fraud contexts unless the instructor expressly permits the use as specified.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: AI-based applications prohibited unless expressly permitted by instructor in specified cheating and fraud contexts

原始证据

Evidence 1
Use of Artificial Intelligence-based applications is prohibited unless expressly permitted, as specified, by the instructor.

Academic Integrity

UW Libraries AI Support guidance says users should cite AI tools and AI-generated outputs when quoting, paraphrasing, or incorporating AI-generated ideas into their own work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: UW Libraries advises citing AI tools and outputs when using AI-generated material

原始证据

Evidence 1
In general, you should cite AI tools and AI-generated outputs when you are quoting, paraphrasing, or incorporating their ideas within your own work.

Academic Integrity

UW Libraries AI Support student guidance advises students to use generative AI chatbots as supplementary tools, avoid copy-pasting chatbot responses into work, and check with instructors before using AI chatbots for assignments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: UW Libraries student guidance recommends supplementary AI use, no copy-paste, and instructor checking

原始证据

Evidence 1
Use Generative AI chatbots as a supplementary tool rather than a primary source. Avoid copy-pasting chatbot responses into your work. Not only might the response be factually incorrect, but copying without attribution can potentially be considered plagiarism. Always check with your instructor before using an AI chatbot to assist in your assignments, as instructor attitudes regarding its use can vary.

Teaching

UW Libraries AI Support faculty guidance points faculty to University of Wyoming Artificial Intelligence Committee syllabus-language recommendations and provides AI-related assignment design considerations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence83%

Normalized value: UW Libraries faculty guidance points to AI Committee syllabus-language recommendations and assignment-design considerations

原始证据

Evidence 1
The University of Wyoming Artificial Intelligence Committee has made recommendations for syllabus language, which can be viewed here. They also recommend the following document with more examples of language.

Source Status

University of Wyoming Academic Affairs maintains an Artificial Intelligence Committee page with current AI resources and updates, including links to syllabus recommendations, AI use guidance, and UW Libraries AI Support.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: Academic Affairs AI Committee page is a current official AI resource hub

原始证据

Evidence 1
Resources & Updates ... UW Libraries AI Support: https://uwyo.libguides.com/c.php?g=1376980&p=10180565 ... AI Syllabus Recommendations ... Guidelines for Acknowledging Use of AI in Reports and Publications

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

5 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 26, 2026Last changedMay 26, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities