Laramie, United States

University of Wyoming

University of Wyoming has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 5 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 6 reviewed claims. Last checked May 26, 2026.

University of Wyoming AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

University of Wyoming has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 5 official source attributions, including 6 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 26, 2026. Discovery context: University of Wyoming is listed as QS 2026 rank 1001-1200.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Wyoming as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 26, 2026 and last changed on May 26, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 5 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-wyoming.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage6 reviewedSource languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-wyoming.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • Evidence includes Source status claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources5

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score75/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence76%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

University of Wyoming Regulation 2-114 says submissions generated in whole or in part by an Artificial Intelligence-based application without attribution to the application will be treated as plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: AI-generated submissions without attribution are treated as plagiarism

Evidence originale

Evidence 1
Submissions generated, in whole or in part, by an Artificial Intelligence-based application without attribution to the application will be treated as plagiarism; instructors, at all times, reserve the right to apply software to detect writing produced by Artificial Intelligence-based applications.

Academic Integrity

University of Wyoming Regulation 2-114 treats use of Artificial Intelligence-based applications as prohibited in cheating and fraud contexts unless the instructor expressly permits the use as specified.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: AI-based applications prohibited unless expressly permitted by instructor in specified cheating and fraud contexts

Evidence originale

Evidence 1
Use of Artificial Intelligence-based applications is prohibited unless expressly permitted, as specified, by the instructor.

Academic Integrity

UW Libraries AI Support guidance says users should cite AI tools and AI-generated outputs when quoting, paraphrasing, or incorporating AI-generated ideas into their own work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: UW Libraries advises citing AI tools and outputs when using AI-generated material

Evidence originale

Evidence 1
In general, you should cite AI tools and AI-generated outputs when you are quoting, paraphrasing, or incorporating their ideas within your own work.

Academic Integrity

UW Libraries AI Support student guidance advises students to use generative AI chatbots as supplementary tools, avoid copy-pasting chatbot responses into work, and check with instructors before using AI chatbots for assignments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: UW Libraries student guidance recommends supplementary AI use, no copy-paste, and instructor checking

Evidence originale

Evidence 1
Use Generative AI chatbots as a supplementary tool rather than a primary source. Avoid copy-pasting chatbot responses into your work. Not only might the response be factually incorrect, but copying without attribution can potentially be considered plagiarism. Always check with your instructor before using an AI chatbot to assist in your assignments, as instructor attitudes regarding its use can vary.

Teaching

UW Libraries AI Support faculty guidance points faculty to University of Wyoming Artificial Intelligence Committee syllabus-language recommendations and provides AI-related assignment design considerations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence83%

Normalized value: UW Libraries faculty guidance points to AI Committee syllabus-language recommendations and assignment-design considerations

Evidence originale

Evidence 1
The University of Wyoming Artificial Intelligence Committee has made recommendations for syllabus language, which can be viewed here. They also recommend the following document with more examples of language.

Source Status

University of Wyoming Academic Affairs maintains an Artificial Intelligence Committee page with current AI resources and updates, including links to syllabus recommendations, AI use guidance, and UW Libraries AI Support.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%

Normalized value: Academic Affairs AI Committee page is a current official AI resource hub

Evidence originale

Evidence 1
Resources & Updates ... UW Libraries AI Support: https://uwyo.libguides.com/c.php?g=1376980&p=10180565 ... AI Syllabus Recommendations ... Guidelines for Acknowledging Use of AI in Reports and Publications

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

5 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 26, 2026Last changedMay 26, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities