Vienna, Austria

Technische Universität Wien

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

6 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Aqueduct API is listed for Technische Universität Wien in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"Aqueduct API","description":"TU Wien dataLAB lists Aqueduct as API access to TU Wien AI services.","howToObtain":"Access steps and audience are not stated on the cited page.","costToUser":"Not specified by the cited source.","availability":"not_mentioned","endorsementType":"not_specified"}

原始证据

证据 1
The TU Wien dataLAB provides several services: Aqueduct API access to TU Wien AI services.

本地化显示 only

The TU Wien dataLAB provides several services: Aqueduct API access to TU Wien AI services.

Ai Tool Treatment

Open WebUI Chat is listed for Technische Universität Wien in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"Open WebUI Chat","description":"TU Wien dataLAB lists Open WebUI Chat as a chat interface for TU Wien AI services.","howToObtain":"Access steps and audience are not stated on the cited page.","costToUser":"Not specified by the cited source.","availability":"not_mentioned","endorsementType":"not_specified"}

原始证据

证据 1
The TU Wien dataLAB provides several services: Open WebUI Chat interface for TU Wien AI services.

本地化显示 only

The TU Wien dataLAB provides several services: Open WebUI Chat interface for TU Wien AI services.

Academic Integrity

TU Wien's student guidance says ChatGPT and other large language models must be documented as aids in written work, AI-used passages must be marked, and undisclosed generative-AI use in student work is treated as equivalent to plagiarism.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: disclose_and_mark_genai_use_in_written_work

原始证据

证据 1
ChatGPT und andere Large Language Models müssen als Hilfsmittel dokumentiert und die Stellen, bei denen KI’s eingesetzt wurden, entsprechend markiert werden. ... Es ist wichtig zu verstehen, dass die nicht offengelegte Verwendung von generativer KI in einer studentischer Arbeit einem Plagiat gleichkommt.

本地化显示 only

ChatGPT and other large language models must be documented as aids and AI-used passages marked; undisclosed generative-AI use in a student work is treated as equivalent to plagiarism.

隐私

TU Wien's teacher handout tells instructors to raise awareness that data entered into AI models requires caution and compliance with data-protection rules, and warns not to enter personal or identifying data in prompts.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%

标准化值: avoid_personal_or_identifying_data_in_ai_prompts

原始证据

证据 1
Schaffen Sie in Ihrer Lehrveranstaltung Bewusstsein dafür, dass man bei der Eingabe von Daten in das Modell vorsichtig sein und die gesetzlichen Regeln zum Datenschutz einhalten muss. Achtung: Geben Sie niemals personenbezogene Daten von sich und insbesondere von anderen Personen ... ein oder Daten, die Personen identifizierbar machen.

本地化显示 only

Instructors should raise awareness that data entered into the model requires caution and compliance with data-protection rules; never enter personal or identifying data.

Academic Integrity

TU Wien's teacher handout says reliable technical identification of AI-tool use is hardly possible and recommends adapting exam formats so they cannot be solved exclusively by AI outputs.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%

标准化值: assessment_design_should_account_for_ai_detection_limits

原始证据

证据 1
Eine zuverlässige technische Identifikation des Einsatzes von KI-Tools ist kaum möglich. ... Prüfungsformate werden so umgestaltet, dass Sie nicht ausschließlich durch KI-Outputs gelöst werden können.

本地化显示 only

Reliable technical identification of AI-tool use is hardly possible; exam formats should be redesigned so they cannot be solved exclusively by AI outputs.

教学

TU Wien's generative-AI teaching guidance says instructors decide whether to use AI systems in courses; if they do, the rules must be clearly defined and the handling of those technologies must be made central.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: instructor_discretion_with_clear_course_rules

原始证据

证据 1
Die Entscheidung, ob Lehrkräfte KI-Systeme verwenden obliegt ihnen selbst. Sollten diese verwendet werden, dann müssen die Vorgaben klar definiert sein und der Umgang mit diesen entsprechend in den Fokus gestellt werden.

本地化显示 only

The decision whether instructors use AI systems is up to them; if used, the rules must be clearly defined and handling of the technologies must be made central.

Source record

官方来源

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Technische Universität Wien AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/technische-universitat-wien

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志